Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Personal Capital During Pregnancy: Findings from the 2007 Los Angeles Mommy and Baby (LAMB) Study
- 430 Downloads
The objectives of this study were to determine if racial and ethnic differences in personal capital during pregnancy exist and to estimate the extent to which any identified racial and ethnic differences in personal capital are related to differences in maternal sociodemographic and acculturation characteristics. Data are from the 2007 Los Angeles Mommy and Baby study (n = 3,716). Personal capital comprised internal resources (self-esteem and mastery) and social resources (partner, social network, and neighborhood support) during pregnancy. The relationships between race/ethnicity and personal capital were assessed using multivariable generalized linear models, examining the impact of sociodemographic and acculturation factors on these relationships. Significant racial and ethnic disparities in personal capital during pregnancy exist. However, socioeconomic status (i.e., income and education) and marital status completely explained Black-White disparities and Hispanic-White disparities in personal capital, whereas acculturation factors, especially nativity and language spoken at home, partially mediated the disparities in personal capital between Asian/Pacific Islander women and White women. Findings suggest that the risks associated with low socioeconomic status, single motherhood, and low acculturation, rather than race or ethnicity, contribute to low personal capital for many pregnant women. As personal capital during pregnancy may influence subsequent maternal and child health outcomes, the development of interventions should consider addressing sociodemographic and acculturation factors in order to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in personal capital and ultimately in poor maternal and child health outcomes.
KeywordsMaternal and child health Personal capital Racial and ethnic disparities Pregnancy
This project was made possible by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Grant # R40MC06635, the Los Angeles County Productivity and Investment fund, and the Los Angeles County Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health (MCAH) Programs general grants and was completed in collaboration with 2007 LAMB Principal Investigator M.C. Lu. LW was supported by a Grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (T32 HS000083; Principal Investigator M. Smith). FW was supported by a Grant from the Health Disparities Research Training Program (T32 HD049302; Principal Investigator G. Sarto). We would like to thank the Los Angeles Mommy and Baby (LAMB) study team (Chandra Higgins, Diana Liu, Marian Eldahaby, Carmen Gutierrez, Yvornia Horton, and Martha Martinez) for their dedicated work in the design and implementation of the 2007 LAMB project. We would also like to thank the Lifecourse Epidemiology and Family Health (LEAF) team for their incredible support with the editing of the manuscript.
- 14.Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 16.Goldenberg, R., Cliver, S., Cutter, G., Hoffman, H., Copper, R., Gotlieb, S., et al. (1991). Maternal psychological characteristics and intrauterine growth retardation. Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health, 6(2), 129–134.Google Scholar
- 34.Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. (2003). Mother’s baseline questionnaire. http://www.fragilefamilies.princeton.edu/documentation.asp.
- 47.Vega, W., Kolody, B. (1985). The meaning of social support and the mediation of stress across cultures. In Vega, W. A., & Miranda, M. R. (eds), Stress and Hispanic mental health. (Vol. DHHS Publication No.85-1410). Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
- 49.Keefe, S., & Padilla, A. (1987). Chicano ethnicity. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar