Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 209–222 | Cite as

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Personal Capital During Pregnancy: Findings from the 2007 Los Angeles Mommy and Baby (LAMB) Study

  • Fathima WakeelEmail author
  • Whitney P. Witt
  • Lauren E. Wisk
  • Michael C. Lu
  • Shin M. Chao


The objectives of this study were to determine if racial and ethnic differences in personal capital during pregnancy exist and to estimate the extent to which any identified racial and ethnic differences in personal capital are related to differences in maternal sociodemographic and acculturation characteristics. Data are from the 2007 Los Angeles Mommy and Baby study (n = 3,716). Personal capital comprised internal resources (self-esteem and mastery) and social resources (partner, social network, and neighborhood support) during pregnancy. The relationships between race/ethnicity and personal capital were assessed using multivariable generalized linear models, examining the impact of sociodemographic and acculturation factors on these relationships. Significant racial and ethnic disparities in personal capital during pregnancy exist. However, socioeconomic status (i.e., income and education) and marital status completely explained Black-White disparities and Hispanic-White disparities in personal capital, whereas acculturation factors, especially nativity and language spoken at home, partially mediated the disparities in personal capital between Asian/Pacific Islander women and White women. Findings suggest that the risks associated with low socioeconomic status, single motherhood, and low acculturation, rather than race or ethnicity, contribute to low personal capital for many pregnant women. As personal capital during pregnancy may influence subsequent maternal and child health outcomes, the development of interventions should consider addressing sociodemographic and acculturation factors in order to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in personal capital and ultimately in poor maternal and child health outcomes.


Maternal and child health Personal capital Racial and ethnic disparities Pregnancy 



This project was made possible by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Grant # R40MC06635, the Los Angeles County Productivity and Investment fund, and the Los Angeles County Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health (MCAH) Programs general grants and was completed in collaboration with 2007 LAMB Principal Investigator M.C. Lu. LW was supported by a Grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (T32 HS000083; Principal Investigator M. Smith). FW was supported by a Grant from the Health Disparities Research Training Program (T32 HD049302; Principal Investigator G. Sarto). We would like to thank the Los Angeles Mommy and Baby (LAMB) study team (Chandra Higgins, Diana Liu, Marian Eldahaby, Carmen Gutierrez, Yvornia Horton, and Martha Martinez) for their dedicated work in the design and implementation of the 2007 LAMB project. We would also like to thank the Lifecourse Epidemiology and Family Health (LEAF) team for their incredible support with the editing of the manuscript.


  1. 1.
    MacDorman, M. F. (2011). Race and ethnic disparities in fetal mortality, preterm birth, and infant mortality in the United States: An overview. Seminal Perinatology, 35(4), 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Finch, B. K., Frank, R., & Hummer, R. A. (2000). Racial/ethnic disparities in infant mortality: The role of behavioral factors. Biodemography and Social Biology, 47(3–4), 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lu, M. C., & Halfon, N. (2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: A life-course perspective. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 7(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Culhane, J. F., & Goldenberg, R. L. (2011). Racial disparities in preterm birth. Seminal Perinatology, 35(4), 234–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hauck, F. R., Tanabe, K. O., & Moon, R. Y. (2011). Racial and ethnic disparities in infant mortality. Seminal Perinatology, 35(4), 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosenthal, L., & Lobel, M. (2011). Explaining racial disparities in adverse birth outcomes: Unique sources of stress for Black American women. Social Science and Medicine, 72(6), 977–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corbie-Smith, G., Henderson, G., Blumenthal, C., Dorrance, J., & Estroff, S. (2008). Conceptualizing race in research. Journal of National Medical Association, 100(10), 1235–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krieger, N. (2000). Counting accountability: Implications of the new approaches to classifying race/ethnicity in the 2000 census. American Journal of Public Health, 90(11), 1687–1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jones, C. P. (2001). Race, racism, and the practice of epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology, 154(4), 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams, D. R. (1997). Race and health: Basic questions, emerging directions. Annals of Epidemiology, 7(5), 322–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lillie-Blanton, M., & LaVeist, T. A. (1996). Race/ethnicity, the social environment, and health. Social Science and Medicine, 43(1), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dunkel Schetter, C. (2011). Psychological science on pregnancy: stress processes, biopsychosocial models, and emerging research issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 531–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rini, C., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Sandman, C., & Wadhwa, P. (1999). Psychological adaptation and birth outcomes: the role of internal resources, stress, and sociocultural context in pregnancy. Health Psychology, 18(4), 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldenberg, R., Cliver, S., Cutter, G., Hoffman, H., Copper, R., Gotlieb, S., et al. (1991). Maternal psychological characteristics and intrauterine growth retardation. Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health, 6(2), 129–134.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feldman, P., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Sandman, C., & Wadhwa, P. (2000). Maternal social support predicts birth weight and fetal growth in human pregnancy. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 715–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Collins, N. L., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Lobel, M., & Scrimshaw, S. C. (1993). Social support in pregnancy: psychosocial correlates of birth outcomes and postpartum depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1243–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bell, J. F., Zimmerman, F. J., Almgren, G. R., Mayer, J. D., & Huebner, C. E. (2006). Birth outcomes among urban African-American women: A multilevel analysis of the role of racial residential segregation. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 3030–3045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zeigler-Hill, V. (2007). Contingent self-esteem and race: Implications for the Black self-esteem advantage. Journal of Black Psychology, 33(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Twenge, J. M., & Crocker, J. (2002). Race and self-esteem: meta-analyses comparing whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians and comment on Gray-Little and Hafdahl (2000). Psychological Bulletin, 128(3), 371–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Norbeck, J. S., & Anderson, N. J. (1989). Psychosocial predictors of pregnancy outcomes in low-income Black, Hispanic and White women. Nursing Research, 38, 204–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Diaz, M. A., Le, H. N., Cooper, B. A., & Munoz, R. F. (2007). Interpersonal factors and perinatal depressive symptomatology in a low-income Latina sample. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(4), 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    West, C., Kantor, G., & Janiski, J. (1998). Sociodemographic predictors and cultural barriers to help-seeking behavior by Latina and Anglo American battered women. Violence Victims, 13(4), 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Campos, B., Dunkel Schetter, C., & Abdou, C. (2008). Familialism, Social support, and stress: positive implications for pregnant Latinas. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(2), 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gee, C., McNerney, C., Reiter, M., & Leaman, S. (2007). Adolescent and young adult mothers’ relationship quality during the transition to parenthood: associations with father involvement in Fragile Families. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hanson, S., Morrison, D., & Ginsburg, A. (1989). The antecedents of teenage fatherhood. Demography, 26, 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lichter, D. T., LeClere, F. B., & McLaughlin, D. K. (1991). Local marriage markets and the marital behavior of black and white women. American Journal of Sociology, 96(4), 843–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Clark, W. (1992). Residential preferences and residential choices in a multiethnic context. Demography, 29(3), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krysan, M., & Farley, R. (2002). The residential preferences of Blacks: Do they explain persistent segregation? Social Forces, 80(3), 937–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vogt Yuan, A. S. (2008). Racial composition of neighborhood and emotional well-being. Sociological Spectrum, 28(1), 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zubrinky, C., & Bobo, L. (1996). Prismatic metropolis: Race and residential segregation in the city of the angels. Social Science Research, 25, 335–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jesse, E., Graham, M., & Swanson, M. (2006). Psychosocial and spiritual factors associated with smoking and substance use during pregnancy in African-American and White low-income women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecological, & Neonatal Nursing, 35(1), 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. (2003). Mother’s baseline questionnaire.
  35. 35.
    Adams, M., Shulman, H., Bruce, C., Hogue, C., & Brogan, D. (1991). The pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system: design, questionnaire, data collection and response rates. PRAMS Working Group. Paediatric and Perinatology Epidemiology, 5, 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Buka, S., Brennan, R., Rich-Edwards, J., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (2003). Neighborhood support and birth weight of urban infants. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Baumeister, L., Marchi, K., Pearl, M., Williams, R., & Braveman, P. (2000). The validity of information on ‘race’ and ‘Hispanic ethnicity’ in California birth certificate data. Health Services Research, 35, 869–883.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Guzzo, K. B., & Furstenberg, F. F. J. (2007). Multipartnered fertility among American men. Demography, 44(3), 583–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Manning, W., & Smock, P. (2000). “Swapping” families: Serial parenting and economic support for children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Harknett, K., & Knab, J. (2007). More kin, less support: Multipartnered fertility and perceived support among mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(1), 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carlson, M. J., & Furstenberg, F. F. J. (2006). The prevalence and correlates of multipartnered fertility among urban US parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(3), 718–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Carlson, M. J., McLanahan, S., & England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41, 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Goldman, N., Kombro, R., Cassio, T., & Pebley, A. R. (2006). Socioeconomic gradients in health for White and Mexican-origin populations. American Journal of Public Health, 96(12), 2186–2193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lin, C. C., Rogot, E., Johnson, N. J., Sorlie, P. D., & Arias, E. (2003). A further study of life expectancy by socioeconomic factors in the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Ethnicity and Disease, 13(2), 240–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Almeida, J., Molnar, B. E., Kawachi, I., & Subramanian, S. V. (2009). Ethnicity and nativity status as determinants of perceived social support: Testing the concept of familism. Social Science and Medicine, 68(10), 1852–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vega, W., Kolody, B. (1985). The meaning of social support and the mediation of stress across cultures. In Vega, W. A., & Miranda, M. R. (eds), Stress and Hispanic mental health. (Vol. DHHS Publication No.85-1410). Washington, DC: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Harley, K., & Eskenazi, B. (2006). Time in the United States, social support and health behaviors during pregnancy among women of Mexican descent. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 3048–3061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Keefe, S., & Padilla, A. (1987). Chicano ethnicity. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sundquist, J., & Winkleby, M. A. (1999). Cardiovascular risk factors in Mexican American adults: A transcultural analysis of NHANES III, 1988–1994. American Journal of Public Health, 89(5), 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cagney, K. A., Browning, C. R., & Wallace, D. M. (2007). The Latino paradox in neighborhood context: the case of asthma and other respiratory conditions. American Journal of Public Health, 97(5), 919–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Peak, C., & Weeks, J. R. (2002). Does community context influence reproductive outcomes of Mexican origin women in San Diego, California? Journal of Immigrant Health, 4(3), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gibson, M. A. (1988). Punjabi orchard farmers: an immigrant enclave in rural California. International Migration Review, 22(1), 28–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Iceland, J., & Nelson, K. A. (2010). The residential segregation of mixed-nativity married couples. Demography, 47(4), 869–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zhang, W., & Ta, V. M. (2009). Social connections, immigration-related factors, and self-rated physical and mental health among Asian Americans. Social Science and Medicine, 68(12), 2104–2112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ceballos, M., & Palloni, A. (2010). Maternal and infant health of Mexican immigrants in the USA: The effects of acculturation, duration, and selective return migration. Ethnic Health, 15(4), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fathima Wakeel
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Whitney P. Witt
    • 2
  • Lauren E. Wisk
    • 2
  • Michael C. Lu
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • Shin M. Chao
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Health Resources and Services AdministrationU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesRockvilleUSA
  4. 4.Center for Healthier Children, Families, and CommunitiesUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public HealthUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  6. 6.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  7. 7.Los Angeles County Department of MaternalChild and Adolescent Health ProgramsLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations