“You Learn to Go Last”: Perceptions of Prenatal Care Experiences among African-American Women with Limited Incomes
African American infants die at higher rates and are at greater risk of adverse birth outcomes than White infants in Milwaukee. Though self-reported experiences of racism have been linked to adverse health outcomes, limited research exists on the impact of racism on women’s prenatal care experiences. The purpose of this study was to examine the experiences of racial discrimination during prenatal care from the perspectives of African American women in a low income Milwaukee neighborhood. Transcripts from six focus groups with twenty-nine women and two individual interviews were analyzed to identify important emergent themes. Validity was maintained using an audit trail, peer debriefing, and two individual member validation sessions. Participants identified three areas of perceived discrimination based on: (1) insurance or income status, (2) race, and (3) lifetime experiences of racial discrimination. Women described being treated differently by support staff and providers based on type of insurance (public versus private), including perceiving a lower quality of care at clinics that accepted public insurance. While some described personally-mediated racism, the majority of women described experiences that fit within a definition of institutionalized racism—in which the system was designed in a way that worked against their attempts to get quality prenatal care. Women also described lifetime experiences of racial discrimination. Our findings suggest that African American women with limited incomes perceive many provider practices and personal interactions during prenatal care as discriminatory. Future studies could explore the relationship between perceptions of discrimination and utilization of prenatal care.
KeywordsRacial discrimination Prenatal care Racial disparities Racism
- 1.Healthy People 2020 [Internet]. Washington: Department of Health and Human Services; c2011 [updated 2012 Jun 21; cited 2012 June 25]. Available from: www.healthypeople.gov/2020/.
- 2.Michalski, K., Gathirimu, J., Benton, A., Swain, G., Gass, E., & Ngui, E. (2010). 2010 Milwaukee Fetal Infant Mortality Review Report. Milwaukee (WI): City of Milwaukee Health Department.Google Scholar
- 3.Wisconsin Interactive Statistics on Health (WISH) data query system, Infant Mortality Module [Internet]. Wisconsin: Wisconsin Dept. of Health Services, Division of Public Health, Office of Health Informatics. c2012—[cited 2012 Jun 25]. Available from: http://dhs.wisconsin.gov/wish/.
- 4.American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 6th ed. Oct. 2007.Google Scholar
- 5.Navarro V. Race or class versus race and class: Mortality differentials in the United States. Lancet, 1990:17;336(8725):1238–1240.Google Scholar
- 9.Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance. Governor Jim Doyle’s Commission on Reducing Racial Disparities in the Wisconsin Justice System: Final Report. Madison (WI); 2008.Google Scholar
- 10.Frey WH. New racial segregation measures for states and large metropolitan areas: Analyses of the 2005–2009 American Community Survey [Internet]. Michigan: Population Studies Center, University of Michigan; 2010 [cited 2012 Jun 25]. Available from: http://www.psc.isr.umich.edu/dis/census/segregation.html/.
- 11.Smedley B. D., Stith A. Y., Nelson AR. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=030908265X.
- 13.Acegbembo, A., Tomar, S., & Logan, H. (2006). Perceptions of racism explains the differences between blacks’ and whites’ level of healthcare trust. Ethnicity and Disease, 16, 792–798.Google Scholar
- 14.Thomas S., Quinn S. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932–1972: Implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community. 1991;1(11):1498–505.Google Scholar
- 20.Giurgescu, C., McFarlin, B. L., Lomax, J., Craddock, C., & Albrecht, A. (2011). Racial discrimination and the Black-White gap in adverse birth outcomes: A review. J Midwifery Women’s. Health, 56, 362–370.Google Scholar
- 21.Nuru-Jeter, A. M., Dominguez, T. P., Hammond, W. P., Leu, J., Skaff, M., Egerter, S., et al. (2009). “It’s the skin you’re in”: African-American women talk about their experiences of racism. An exploratory study to develop measures of racism for birth outcome studies. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 13(1), 29–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.De Marco, M., Thorburn, S., & Zhao, W. (2008). Perceived discrimination during prenatal care, labor, and delivery: An examination of data from the Oregon Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 1998–1999, 2000, and 2001. American Journal of Public Health, 98(10), 1818–1822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Finch, H., & Lewis, J. (2008). Chapter 7: Focus Groups. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (pp. 170–198). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- 25.Patton M. Purposeful Sampling. In: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications; 1990. p. 169–86.Google Scholar
- 28.Hall, J. M., & Stevens, P. E. (1991). Rigor in feminist research. ANS, 13(3), 16–29.Google Scholar
- 29.Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- 31.Wisconsin Department of Health Services. What Moms Tell Us: Wisconsin PRAMS [Internet]. Madison: Office of Health Informatics & Bureau of Community Health Promotion; 2010 Jul 1 [cited 2012 Jun 26]. Available from: http://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/healthybirths/pdf/prams20100701.pdf.