Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 783–796 | Cite as

Post-Disaster Reproductive Health Outcomes

  • Marianne E. Zotti
  • Amy M. Williams
  • McKaylee Robertson
  • Jennifer Horney
  • Jason Hsia
Methodological Notes
First Online:

Abstract

We examined methodological issues in studies of disaster-related effects on reproductive health outcomes and fertility among women of reproductive age and infants in the United States (US). We conducted a systematic literature review of 1,635 articles and reports published in peer-reviewed journals or by the government from January 1981 through December 2010. We classified the studies using three exposure types: (1) physical exposure to toxicants; (2) psychological trauma; and (3) general exposure to disaster. Fifteen articles met our inclusion criteria concerning research focus and design. Overall studies pertained to eight different disasters, with most (n = 6) focused on the World Trade Center attack. Only one study examined pregnancy loss, i.e., occurrence of spontaneous abortions post-disaster. Most studies focused on associations between disaster and adverse birth outcomes, but two studies pertained only to post-disaster fertility while another two examined it in addition to adverse birth outcomes. In most studies disaster-affected populations were assumed to have experienced psychological trauma, but exposure to trauma was measured in only four studies. Furthermore, effects of both physical exposure to toxicants and psychological trauma on disaster-affected populations were examined in only one study. Effects on birth outcomes were not consistently demonstrated, and study methodologies varied widely. Even so, these studies suggest an association between disasters and reproductive health and highlight the need for further studies to clarify associations. We postulate that post-disaster surveillance among pregnant women could improve our understanding of effects of disaster on the reproductive health of US pregnant women.

Keywords

Disaster Birth outcomes Low birth weight Preterm birth Fertility 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Barbara Landreth, CDC Librarian, and Leslie Harrison, MPH, Tonya Stancil, PhD, and Brian Morrow, MA, of the PRAMS team for their assistance with this paper. This publication was supported by funds made available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office for Public Health Preparedness and Response.

References

  1. 1.
    Cruz, M, (Ed.) (2008). Natural/environmental disasters. CDC Public Health Readiness Certificate Program; 2008 9/22–25; Atlanta, GA: CDC.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    FEMA. (2011). FEMA declared disasters by year or state. [Cited 2011 March 4]; Available from: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema.
  3. 3.
    Ross, T., & Lott, N. (2003). A climatology of 1980–2003 extreme weather and climate events, Technical Report No. 2003-01. Ashville, NC: National Climatic Data Center.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peacock, W. G., Kunreuther, H., Hooke, W. H., Cutter, S. L., Chang, S. E., & Berke, P. R. (2008). Toward a resiliency and vulnerability observatory network: RAVON. 2008 HRRC reports: 08-02R.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Center NCD. (2011). Billion dollar U.S. weather/climate disasters. [Cited 2011 October 20]; Available from: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/reports/billionz.html.
  6. 6.
    Cordero, J. F. (1993). The epidemiology of disasters and adverse reproductive outcomes: Lessons learned. Environmental Health Perspectives, 101(Suppl 2), 131–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Landrigan, P. J., Forman, J., Galvez, M., Newman, B., Engel, S. M., & Chemtob, C. (2008). Impact of September 11 World Trade Center disaster on children and pregnant women. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 75(2), 129–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Callaghan, W. M., Rasmussen, S. A., Jamieson, D. J., Ventura, S. J., Farr, S. L., Sutton, P. D., et al. (2007). Health concerns of women and infants in times of natural disasters: Lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11(4), 307–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buekens, P., Xiong, X., & Harville, E. (2006). Hurricanes and pregnancy. Birth, 33(2), 91–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harville, E., Xiong, X., & Buekens, P. (2011). Disasters and perinatal health: A systematic review. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 65(11), 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohan, C. L., & Cole, S. W. (2002). Life course transitions and natural disaster: marriage, birth, and divorce following Hurricane Hugo. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1), 14–25.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodgers, J. L., St John, C. A., & Coleman, R. (2005). Did fertility go up after the Oklahoma City bombing? An analysis of births in metropolitan counties in Oklahoma, 1990–1999. Demography, 42(4), 675–692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Mathews, T. J., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2009). The effect of Hurricane Katrina: Births in the US Gulf Coast region, before and after the storm. National Vital Statistics Reports, 58(2), 1–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tong, V. T., Zotti, M. E., & Hsia, J. (2011). Impact of the Red River catastrophic flood on women giving birth in North Dakota, 1994–2000. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15, 281–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    James, L. M., Erickson, J. D., & McClearn, A. B. (1994). Prevalence of birth defects. In L. S. Wilcox & J. S. Marks (Eds.), From data to action: CDC’s public health surveillance for women, infants, and children (pp. 203–216). Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health & Human Services.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Janerich, D. T., Stark, A. D., Greenwald, P., Burnett, W. S., Jacobson, H. I., & McCusker, J. (1981). Increased leukemia, lymphoma, and spontaneous abortion in Western New York following a flood disaster. Public Health Reports, 96(4), 350–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glynn, L. M., Wadhwa, P. D., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Chicz-Demet, A., & Sandman, C. A. (2001). When stress happens matters: Effects of earthquake timing on stress responsivity in pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 184(4), 637–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Engel, S. M., Berkowitz, G. S., Wolff, M. S., & Yehuda, R. (2005). Psychological trauma associated with the World Trade Center attacks and its effect on pregnancy outcome. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 19(5), 334–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xiong, X., Harville, E. W., Mattison, D. R., Elkind-Hirsch, K., Pridjian, G., & Buekens, P. (2008). Exposure to Hurricane Katrina, post-traumatic stress disorder and birth outcomes. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 336(2), 111–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lipkind, H. S., Curry, A. E., Huynh, M., Thorpe, L. E., & Matte, T. (2010). Birth outcomes among offspring of women exposed to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 116(4), 917–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gaudino, J. A., Hoyert, D. L., MacDorman, M. F., Gazmarian, J. A., Adams, M., & Kiely, J. L. (1994). Fetal deaths. In L. S. Wilcox & J. S. Marks (Eds.), From data to action: CDC’S public health surveillance for women, infants, and children (pp. 163–178). Atlanta, GA: CDC.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Macdorman, M. F., & Kirmeyer, S. (2009). The challenge of fetal mortality. NCHS Data Brief, 16, 1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vital Statistics of the United States 1976 Volume II-Mortality Part A (1980) In: US Department of Health and Human Services. (Ed.) Hyattsville, MD, p. Section 3.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peck, J. D., Leviton, A., & Cowan, L. D. (2010). A review of the epidemiologic evidence concerning the reproductive health effects of caffeine consumption: A 2000–2009 update. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48, 2549–2576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weinberg, C. R., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Baird, D. D., & Wilcox, A. J. (1992). Efficiency and bias in studies of early pregnancy loss. Epidemiology, 3(1), 17–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ventura, S. J., Abma, J. C., Mosher, W. D., & Henshaw, S. K. (2009). Estimated pregnancy rates for the United States, 1990–2005: An update. National Vital Statistics Reports, 58(4), 1–14.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zahran, S., Snodgrass, J. G., Peek, L., & Weiler, S. (2010). Maternal hurricane exposure and fetal distress risk. Risk Analysis, 30(10), 1591–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berkowitz, G. S., Wolff, M. S., Janevic, T. M., Holzman, I. R., Yehuda, R., & Landrigan, P. J. (2003). The world trade center disaster and intrauterine growth restriction. [Erratum appears in JAMA. 2003 Dec 10;290(22):2943]. JAMA, 290(5), 595–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lederman, S. A., Rauh, V., Weiss, L., Stein, J. L., Hoepner, L. A., Becker, M., et al. (2004). The effects of the World Trade Center event on birth outcomes among term deliveries at three lower Manhattan hospitals. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(17), 1772–1778.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perera, F. P., Tang, D., Rauh, V., Lester, K., Tsai, W. Y., Tu, Y. H., et al. (2005). Relationships among polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts, proximity to the World Trade Center, and effects on fetal growth. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(8), 1062–1067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Perera, F. P., Rauh, V., Whyatt, R. M., Tang, D., Tsai, W. Y., Bernert, J. T., et al. (2005). A summary of recent findings on birth outcomes and developmental effects of prenatal ETS, PAH, and pesticide exposures. Neurotoxicology, 26(4), 573–587.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    IOM. (2007). Preterm birth: Causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rice, D. C. (2005). Assessing the effects of environmental toxicant exposure in development epidemiological studies: Issues for risk assessment. Neurotoxicology, 26, 483–489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eskenazi, B., Marks, A. R., Catalano, R., Bruckner, T., & Toniolo, P. G. (2007). Low birthweight in New York City and upstate New York following the events of September 11th. Human Reproduction, 22(11), 3013–3020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Harville, E. W., Tran, T., Xiong, X., & Buekens, P. (2010). Population changes, racial/ethnic disparities, and birth outcomes in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 4, S39–S45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists CoOP. (2005). Inappropriate use of the terms fetal distress and birth asphyxia. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 326. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 106, 1469–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dobie, S. A., Baldwin, L., Rosenblatt, R. A., Fordyce, M. A., Andrilla, C. H. A., & Hart, L. G. (1998). How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington state experience with low-risk pregnancies. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2(3), 145–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tolson, G. C., Barnes, J. M., Gay, G. A., & Kowaleski, J. L. (1991). The 1989 revision of the US standard certificates and reports. Vital and Health Statistics, 4(28), 17.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Statistics NCfH. (2000). Report of the panel to evaluate the US standard certificates. Washington, DC: CDC.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kiely, J. L., Brett, K. M., Yu, S., & Rowley, D. L. (1994). Low birth weight and intrauterine growth retardation. In L. S. Wilcox & J. S. Marks (Eds.), From data to action: CDC’s public health surveillance for women, infants, and children (pp. 185–202). Atlanta, GA: CDC.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Blackmore, C. A., & Rowley, D. L. (1994). Preterm birth. In L. S. Wilcox & J. S. Marks (Eds.), From data to action: CDC’s public health surveillance for women, infants, and children (pp. 179–183). Atlanta, GA: CDC.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    David, R. J. (1980). The quality and completeness of birthweight and gestational age data in computerized birth files. American Journal of Public Health, 70(9), 964–973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    CDC. (2002). Infant mortality and low birth weights among black and white infants–United States, 1980–2000. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 51(27), 589–592.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ananth, C. V., Joseph, K. S., Oyelese, Y., Demissie, K., & Vintzileos, A. M. (2005). Trends in preterm birth and perinatal mortality among singletons: United States, 1989 through 2000. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 105(5 Pt 1), 1084–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Horney, J., Zotti, M. E., Williams, A., & Hsia, J. (2012). Cluster sampling with referral to improve the efficiency of estimating unmet needs among pregnant and postpartum women after disasters. Women’s Health Issues, 22–3, e253–e257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jamieson, D. J., Honein, M. A., Rasmussen, S. A., Williams, J. L., Swerdlow, D. L., Biggerstaff, M. S., et al. (2009). H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA. Lancet, 374, 451–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mosher, W. D., Martinez, G. M., Chandra, A., Abma, J. C., & Willson, S. J. (2005). Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982–2002. Advance Data. 2005/01/07 ed2004, 1–36.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    CDC. (2011). Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS). CDC [Cited 2011 April 1]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/prams/.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA)  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marianne E. Zotti
    • 1
  • Amy M. Williams
    • 1
  • McKaylee Robertson
    • 1
  • Jennifer Horney
    • 2
  • Jason Hsia
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Reproductive Health/NCCDPHPCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Center for Public Health PreparednessUniversity of North Carolina (UNC)Chapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations