Factors Promoting or Potentially Impeding School Success: Disparities and State Variations for Children with Special Health Care Needs
- First Online:
- 500 Downloads
School success predicts many pathways for health and well-being across the life span. Factors promoting or potentially impeding school success are critical to understand for all children and for children with special health care needs (CSHCN), whose life course trajectories are already impacted by their chronic health problems. The 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health was used (1) to estimate national and state prevalence and within and across states disparities in factors promoting school success (engagement, participation, safety) or potentially impeding success (missing school, grade repetition, school identified problems) for all children and CSHCN and (2) to evaluate associations with CSHCN service need complexity and presence of emotional, behavioral or developmental problems (EBD) as well as with school case management policies in states. Among school age children, 60 % experienced all three factors promoting school success (49.3–73.8 % across states), dropping to 51.3 % for CSHCN (39.4–64.7 % across states) and to 36.2 % for the 40 % of all CSHCN who have both more complex service needs and EBD. CSHCN were more likely to experience factors potentially impeding school success. After accounting for child factors, CSHCN living in states requiring case management in schools for children with disabilities were less likely to experience grade repetition (OR 0.65). Within-state disparities between non-CSHCN and CSHCN varied across states. Threats to school success for US children are pervasive and are especially pronounced for CSHCN with more complex needs and EBD. Findings support broad, non-condition specific efforts to promote school success for CSHCN and consideration of state school policies, such as case management.
KeywordsSchool success factors Children with special health care needs National Survey of Children’s Health School engagement Missed school Repeating a grade Emotional Behavioral Developmental problems State variations School case management
National Survey of Children’s Health
Children with special health care needs
Emotional, behavioral or developmental problem
Adjusted odds ratio
- 1.National Research Council, Institute of Medicine (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering High School students’ motivation to learn. Committee on increasing high school students’ engagement and motivation to learn. Board on children, youth, and families, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- 2.Connell, J. P., Wellborn, J. G., Gunnar, M. R., Sroufe, A. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self-processes and development: Minnesota symposium on child psychology (pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- 3.Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.Google Scholar
- 9.Dunkle, M., & Nash, M. A. (1991). Beyond the health room. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers, Resource Center on Educational Equity.Google Scholar
- 10.Novello, A. C., Degraw, C., & Kleinman, D. V. (1992). Healthy children ready to learn: An essential collaboration between health and education. Public Health Report, 107(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
- 11.Berkeley, CA: U. C. Berkeley College of Natural Resources. http://cwh.berkeley.edu/sites/greeneventsguide.org.cwh/files/primary_pdfs/CewaerPaper_Research.pdf.
- 19.Barbaresi, W. J., Katusic, S. K., Colligan, R. C., Weaver, A. L., & Jacobsen, S. J. (2007). Long-term school outcomes for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A population-based perspective. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 28(4), 265–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. (2011). Annual report of state asthma and allergy policies for schools: 2010 update to the state honor roll (Washington state example). http://www.aafa.org/display.cfm?id=5&sub=105&cont=649. Accessed April 10, 2011.
- 26.Blumberg, S., Foster, E., Frasier, A., et al. (2009). Design and operation of the National Survey of Children’s Health, 2007. Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
- 27.National Survey of Children’s Health. (2007). Maternal and Child Health Bureau in collaboration with the National Center for Health Statistics. 2007 NSCH Indicator SPSS Data Set prepared by the Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health, Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. http://www.childhealthdata.org.
- 28.Kogan, M. D., Ghandour, R. M., Schempf, A. H. (2012). Introduction to the Special Issue of Articles from the 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health. Maternal and Child Health Journal Supplement. doi:10.1007/s10995-012-1007-x.
- 30.Center for Policy Studies, Education Research, and Community Development (CPSER). (2011). Research brief: Criteria for grade to grade promotion and/or retention. Obtained at: http://icee.isu.edu/Publications-All/PS&ERPublications/Gradetogradepromandreten.pdf. Accessed June 26, 2011.
- 34.Centre for Multilevel Modeling. (2009). A user’s guide to MLwiN version 2.10. Bristol: University of Bristol.Google Scholar
- 35.Merlo, J., Chaix, B., Ohlsson, H., et al. (2006). A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: Using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 60(4), 290–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar