Reasons Why Women Accept or Reject the Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (TIV) During Pregnancy
- 888 Downloads
The aim of the study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the reasons why pregnant women accept or reject the seasonal influenza vaccine. The qualitative descriptive design used a face-to-face semi-structured interview format. Sixty pregnant and postpartum women at two hospitals in the Northeastern United States participated. Content analysis was the inductive method used to code the data and identify emergent themes. Six themes emerged from the data: differing degrees of influence affect action to vaccinate; two-for-one benefit is a pivotal piece of knowledge that influences future vaccination; fear if I do (vaccinate), fear if I don’t; women who verbalize ‘no need’ for the vaccine also fear the vaccine; a conveniently located venue for vaccination reduces barriers to uptake; H1N1—a benefit and barrier to the seasonal vaccine. Our study supports previous findings and reveals a deeper understanding and interpretation of the behavior and decision-making to accept or reject the influenza vaccine. Understanding the reasons behind the behavior of vaccine rejection gives us the chance to change it.
KeywordsPregnancy Influenza Vaccination Qualitative interviews
We are thankful for the two other analysts Elaine F. Martin, PhD., and Cathleen Walker, MA., and transcriptionist Joanie G. D. Meharry. We also are indebted to our 60 women, whose participation and cooperation were central to this study.
- 9.American Academy of Pediatrics (2010). Policy statement recommendations for prevention and control of influenza in children, 2010-2011. Committee on Infectious Diseases. Pediatrics E-pub August 30, 2010. http://www.pediatrics.org.
- 10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2004). Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morbidity, Mortality Weekly Report, 53(RR-06), 1–40.Google Scholar
- 11.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2004). Committee opinion no. 305, Influenza vaccination and treatment during pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 104(5), 1125–1126.Google Scholar
- 12.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. United States National Health Interview Survey. (2006). Self-reported influenza vaccination coverage trends 1989–2006. Retrieved June 1, 2011, from http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/vaccination/pdf/vaccinetrend.pdf.
- 13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women—United States, 2011 influenza season. MMWR, Morbidity, Mortality Weekly Report, 60(32), 1078–1082.Google Scholar
- 14.Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. Retrieved June 6, 2011. http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/pdfs/HP2020objectives.pdf.
- 17.Becker, M. H. (1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 324–473.Google Scholar
- 18.Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 20.Krippendorff, K. (2004). Introduction to content analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 21.Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
- 24.Tong, A., Biringer, A., Ofner-Agostini, M., Upshur, R., & McGeer, A. (2008). A cross-sectional study of maternity care providers’ and women’s knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours towards influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Canada, 30, 404–410.Google Scholar
- 27.Tucker Edmonds, B. M. & Coleman, J. (2010). Risk perceptions, worry, or distrust: What drives pregnant women’s decisions to accept the H1N1 Vaccine? Maternal Child Health Journal, E-pub October, 09.Google Scholar