Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 579–586

Effects of an Integrated Care System on Quality of Care and Satisfaction for Children with Special Health Care Needs

  • Caprice Knapp
  • Vanessa Madden
  • Phyllis Sloyer
  • Elizabeth Shenkman


To assess the effects of an Integrated Care System (ICS) on parent-reported quality of care and satisfaction for Children with Special Health Care Needs (CSHCN). In 2006 Florida reformed its Medicaid program in Broward and Duval counties. Children’s Medical Services Network (CMSN) chose to participate in the reform and developed an ICS for CSHCN. The ICS ushered in several changes such as more prior approval requirements and closing of the provider network. Telephone surveys were conducted with CMSN parents whose children reside in the reform counties and parents whose children reside outside of the reform counties in 2006 and 2007 (n = 1,727). Results from multivariate quasi-experimental models show that one component of parent-report quality of care, customer service, increased. Following implementation of the ICS, customer service increased by 0.22 points. After implementation of the ICS, parent-reported quality and satisfaction were generally unaffected. Although significant increases were not seen in the majority of the quality and satisfaction domains, it is nonetheless encouraging that parents did not report negative experiences with the ICS. It is important to present these interim findings so that progress can be monitored and decision-makers can begin to consider if the program should be expanded statewide.


Children Medicaid Managed care Quality of care Survey 


  1. 1.
    McPherson, M., Arango, P., Fox, H., Lauver, C., McManus, M., Newacheck, P. W., et al. (1998). A new definition of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics, 102(1 Pt 1), 137–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). National survey of children with special health care needs, 2005–2006. Available at: Accessed 4 March 2009.
  3. 3.
    Newacheck, P. W., & Kim, S. E. (2005). A national profile of health care utilization and expenditures for children with special health care needs. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159(1), 10–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newacheck, P. W., Inkelas, M., & Kim, S. E. (2004). Health services use and health care expenditures for children with disabilities. Pediatrics, 114(1), 79–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monheit, A. C. (2003). Persistence in health expenditures in the short run: Prevalence and consequences. Medical Care, 41(7 Suppl), III53–III64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shenkman, E., Knapp, C., Sappington, D., Vogel, B., & Schatz, D. (2007). Persistence of high health care expenditures among children in Medicaid. Medical Care Research and Review, 64(3), 304–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liptak, G. S., Shone, L. P., Auinger, P., Dick, A. W., Ryan, S. A., & Szilagyi, P. G. (2006). Short-term persistence of high health care costs in a nationally representative sample of children. Pediatrics, 118(4), e1001–e1009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaye, N., Curtis, D., & Booth, M. (2000). Certain children with special health care needs: An assessment of state activities and their relationship to HCFA’s interim criteria. Portland, ME: National Academy for State Health Policy.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lawson, C., Swisher, L., & DelPilar, J. (2005). National summary of state medicaid managed care programs. Washington, DC: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huffman, L. C., Brat, G. A., Chamberlain, L. J., & Wise, P. H. (2010). Impact of managed care on publicly insured children with special health care needs. Academic Pediatrics, 10(1), 48–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell, J. M., Gaskin, D. J., & Kozma, C. (2008). Health supervision visits among SSI-eligible children in the D.C. Medicaid program: a comparison of enrollees in fee-for-service and partially capitated managed care. Inquiry, 45(2), 198–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schuster, C. R., Mitchell, J. M., & Gaskin, D. J. (2007). Partially capitated managed care versus FFS for special needs children. Health Care Financing Review, 28(4), 109–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitchell, J. M., & Gaskin, D. J. (2004). Do children receiving Supplemental Security Income who are enrolled in Medicaid fare better under a fee-for-service or comprehensive capitation model? Pediatrics, 114(1), 196–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sloyer, P., Handler, E., Brooks, R., & Florida Department of Health. (2000). The children’s medical services network: Florida’s public/private managed care approach for children with special health care needs. Florida Health Care Journal, 103, 35–41.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2007). CAHPS health plan survey 4.0: Child medicaid questionnaire. Washington, DC. Available at: Accessed February 2009.
  16. 16.
    HEDIS Technical Specifications, 2008. (2007). Washington, DC: National Commission on Quality Assurance.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Rode, C. A. (1999). The PedsQL: Measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Medical Care, 37(2), 126–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    StataCorp, Release 10. Available at: Accessed January 2010.
  19. 19.
    Mitchell, J. B., Khatutsky, G., & Swigonski, N. L. (2001). Impact of the Oregon health plan on children with special health care needs. Pediatrics, 107(4), 736–743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hall, A., Young, G., Bell, L., Thompson, K., & Elliott, K. (2008). Florida medicaid reform: Views of early transition enrollees. Issue brief no. 3. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Medicaid Reform Evaluation Team, January 2008.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (2008). Medicaid reform: Choice counseling goal met, but some beneficiaries experience difficulties selecting a health plan that best meets their needs. Rep. no. 08-46. Tallahassee, FL. July 2008.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cooper, W. O., Hickson, G. B., Gray, C. L., & Ray, W. A. (1999). Changes in continuity of enrollment among high-risk children following implementation of TennCare. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 153(11), 1145–1149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grossman, L. K., Rich, L. N., Michelson, S., & Hagerty, G. (1999). Managed care of children with special health care needs: the ABC Program. Clinical pediatrics (Phila), 38(3), 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Artiga, S. (2008). Florida medicaid reform waiver: Early findings and current status. Issue brief. Washington, D.C.: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, October 2008.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alker, J., Hoadley, J., & Thompson. J. (2008). Florida’s experience with medicaid reform: What has been learned in the first two years? Rep. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Health Policy Institute, October 2008.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoadley, J., & Alker, J. (2007). Uncertain access to needed drugs: Florida’s medicaid reform creates challenges for patients. Issue brief no. 3. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Health Policy Institute, July 2007.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lemak, C., & Yarbrough. A. (2008). Medicaid reform organizational analyses. Issue brief no. 1. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Medicaid Reform Evaluation Team, January 2008.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coughlin, T. A., Long, S. K., Triplett, T., Artiga, S., Lyons, B., Duncan, R. P., et al. (2008). Florida’s medicaid reform: informed consumer choice? Health Affairs (Millwood), 27(6), w523–w532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Knapp, C., Madden, V., Marcu, M., Sloyer, P., & Shenkman, E. (2010). Parents’ experiences in choosing a health plan for their children with special health care needs. Maternal and Child Health Journal. EPub (ahead of print), Mar 8 2010.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Duncan, P., Lemak, C., Yarbrough, A., Harman, J., Hall, A., McKay, & N., Bell. L. (2008). Comparison of medicaid per member per month expenditures one year prior to reform to first four months of reform issue brief no. 4. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Medicaid Reform Evaluation Team, January 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caprice Knapp
    • 1
  • Vanessa Madden
    • 1
  • Phyllis Sloyer
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Shenkman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health Outcomes & PolicyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Florida Department of HealthChildren’s Medical Services DivisionGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations