Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request: A Western North Carolina Perspective
- First Online:
- 390 Downloads
Cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR), a primary cesarean without medical indication for a singleton, term pregnancy, has been identified by physicians as one factor in the increasing rate of cesarean delivery despite nationwide efforts to the contrary. The purpose of this project was to better understand women’s preferences and motivations for their desired mode of delivery. A 62-item survey was administered to pregnant women asking for their delivery preference, their reasons, sources of information, feelings about this pregnancy, and opinions about delivery options. Responses were analyzed for candidates for CDMR or for repeat cesarean section, separately; the standard error of measure is ±4% (95% CI). 396 patients returned surveys (response rate = 63.2%). CDMR was desired by 34/316 (11%) candidates; repeat cesarean was desired by 32/70 (46%) patients. Significant correlates of CDMR included choosing during the first trimester (22% vs. 8.2%; RR = 2.72; P = 0.015), smoking during pregnancy (19.7% vs. 7.6%; RR = 2.60; P = 0.036), and being worried about the delivery (P = 0.004). Desire for CDMR increased as worries increased from unworried (4.4%) to somewhat (11.8%) to very worried (27.6%). Primary reasons included existing medical complications and preventing birth injury. The majority of patients believed CDMR should be an “informed choice”; other opinions varied by delivery preference. The majority of women preferred vaginal deliveries suggesting little contribution of CDMR to the increasing cesarean rate. Contrary to physicians’ beliefs, the women’s primary objective was their infants’ health rather than their own well-being.
KeywordsCesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) Delivery routes Patient preferences
- 1.US Department of Health and Human Services HP. (2010). Midcourse review. Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/data/midcourse/default.htm. Accessed January 26, 2010.
- 2.International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). (1999). Ethical guidelines on human reproduction and women’s health. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 64, 317–322.Google Scholar
- 3.NIH State-of-the Science Conference Statement on Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request (2006). NIH Conses Sci Statements. March 27–29, 23, 1–29.Google Scholar
- 7.Childbirth Connection. Mothers report cesarean views and experiences: New national Listening to Mothers survey results. Available at http://www.childbirthconnection.org/article.asp?ck=10372. Accessed December 29, 2009.
- 8.Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. (2007). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 110, 1501–1504.Google Scholar
- 9.US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 Proposed Objectives. Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/hp2020/Objectives/TopicAreas.aspx Accessed January 26, 2010.
- 13.Grady, D. (2008). After Cesareans, Some See Higher Insurance Cost. New York Times, June 1, 2008. Available at http://www.nytimes.com. Accessed January 26, 2010.
- 17.Berholt, T., Ostberg, B., Legarth, J., & Weber, T. (2004). Danish obstetricians’ personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: A nation-wide survey. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 83, 262–266.Google Scholar
- 18.American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG News Release: New ACOG opinion addresses elective cesarean controversy. October 31, 2003. Available at www.acog/org/from_home?publications/press_releases/nr10-31-03-1.cfm. Accessed January 26, 2010.
- 27.American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG News Release: Gallup survey reveals women ob-gyns benefit from “insider knowledge.” December 9, 2003. Available at www.acog/org/from_home?publications/press_releases/nr12-09-03-2.cfm. Accessed November 19, 2008.
- 29.Lavender, T., Hofmeyr, G. J., Neilson, J. P., Kingdon, C., Gyte, G. M. L. (2006). Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006(3). Art No. CD004660. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD00460.pub2.
- 31.Pinott, J. A., & Pinotti, M. (1994). The cesarean epidemic in South America. JSOGC, 6, 154–157.Google Scholar
- 34.Wiklund, I., Edman, G., & Andolf, E. (2007). Cesarean section on maternal request. Cesarean section on maternal request: Reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 86, 451–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Russo, C. A., Andrews, R. M. Potentially avoidable injuries to mothers and newborns during childbirth, 2006. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Statistical Brief #74. May 2009. Available at www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb74.jsp Accessed November 15, 2010.
- 41.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2010). Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin # 115. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116(2), 450–463.Google Scholar