Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 725–734

Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request: A Western North Carolina Perspective

  • Stephanie T. Romero
  • Carol C. Coulson
  • Shelley L. Galvin
Article
  • 390 Downloads

Abstract

Cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR), a primary cesarean without medical indication for a singleton, term pregnancy, has been identified by physicians as one factor in the increasing rate of cesarean delivery despite nationwide efforts to the contrary. The purpose of this project was to better understand women’s preferences and motivations for their desired mode of delivery. A 62-item survey was administered to pregnant women asking for their delivery preference, their reasons, sources of information, feelings about this pregnancy, and opinions about delivery options. Responses were analyzed for candidates for CDMR or for repeat cesarean section, separately; the standard error of measure is ±4% (95% CI). 396 patients returned surveys (response rate = 63.2%). CDMR was desired by 34/316 (11%) candidates; repeat cesarean was desired by 32/70 (46%) patients. Significant correlates of CDMR included choosing during the first trimester (22% vs. 8.2%; RR = 2.72; P = 0.015), smoking during pregnancy (19.7% vs. 7.6%; RR = 2.60; P = 0.036), and being worried about the delivery (P = 0.004). Desire for CDMR increased as worries increased from unworried (4.4%) to somewhat (11.8%) to very worried (27.6%). Primary reasons included existing medical complications and preventing birth injury. The majority of patients believed CDMR should be an “informed choice”; other opinions varied by delivery preference. The majority of women preferred vaginal deliveries suggesting little contribution of CDMR to the increasing cesarean rate. Contrary to physicians’ beliefs, the women’s primary objective was their infants’ health rather than their own well-being.

Keywords

Cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) Delivery routes Patient preferences 

References

  1. 1.
    US Department of Health and Human Services HP. (2010). Midcourse review. Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/data/midcourse/default.htm. Accessed January 26, 2010.
  2. 2.
    International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). (1999). Ethical guidelines on human reproduction and women’s health. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 64, 317–322.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NIH State-of-the Science Conference Statement on Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request (2006). NIH Conses Sci Statements. March 27–29, 23, 1–29.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coleman, V. H., Lawrence, H., & Schulkin, J. (2009). Rising cesarean delivery rates: The impact of cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 64(2), 115–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meikle, S. F., Steiner, C. A., Zhang, J., & Lawrence, W. L. (2005). A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 105, 751–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gossman, G. L., Joesch, J. M., & Tanfer, K. (2006). Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 108(6), 1506–1516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Childbirth Connection. Mothers report cesarean views and experiences: New national Listening to Mothers survey results. Available at http://www.childbirthconnection.org/article.asp?ck=10372. Accessed December 29, 2009.
  8. 8.
    Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. (2007). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 110, 1501–1504.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 Proposed Objectives. Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov/hp2020/Objectives/TopicAreas.aspx Accessed January 26, 2010.
  10. 10.
    Minkoff, H., Powderly, K. R., Chervenak, F., & McCullough, L. B. (2004). Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103, 387–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalish, R. B., McCullough, L. B., & Chervenak, F. A. (2008). Patient choice cesarean delivery: Ethical issues. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 20, 116–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bost, B. W. (2003). Cesarean delivery on demand: What will it cost? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 188, 1418–1423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grady, D. (2008). After Cesareans, Some See Higher Insurance Cost. New York Times, June 1, 2008. Available at http://www.nytimes.com. Accessed January 26, 2010.
  14. 14.
    Al-Mufti, R., McCarthy, A., & Fisk, N. M. (1997). Survey of obstetricians’ personal preference and discretionary practice. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 73, 1–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Land, R., Parry, A., Rane, A., & Wilson, D. (2001). Personal preference of obstetricians towards child birth. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 41, 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gonen, R., Tamir, A., & Degani, S. (2002). Obstetricians’ opinions regarding patient choice in cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 99, 577–580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berholt, T., Ostberg, B., Legarth, J., & Weber, T. (2004). Danish obstetricians’ personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: A nation-wide survey. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 83, 262–266.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG News Release: New ACOG opinion addresses elective cesarean controversy. October 31, 2003. Available at www.acog/org/from_home?publications/press_releases/nr10-31-03-1.cfm. Accessed January 26, 2010.
  19. 19.
    Bettes, B. A., Coleman, V. H., Zinberg, S., Spong, C. Y., Portnoy, B., DeVoto, E., et al. (2007). Cesarean delivery on maternal request: Obstetrician-gynecologists’ knowledge, perception, and practice patterns. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(1), 57–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu, J. M., Hundley, A. F., & Visco, A. G. (2005). Elective primary cesarean delivery: Attitudes of urogynecologists and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 105(2), 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cotzias, C. S., Paterson-Brown, S., & Fisk, N. M. (2001). Obstetricans say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: A survey of current opinion. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 97, 15–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ghetti, C., Chan, B. K. S., & Guise, J. M. (2004). Physicians’ responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery. Birth, 31, 280–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wax, J. R., CArtin, A., Pinette, M. G., & Blackstone, J. (2005). Patient choice cesarean-the Maine experience. Birth, 32(3), 203–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu, T. C., Lin, H. C., Chen, C. S., & Lee, H. C. (2008). Obstetrician gender and the likelihood of performing a maternal request for a cesarean delivery. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, 136, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karlstrom, A., Engstrom-Olofsson, R., Nystedt, A., Thomas, J., & Hildingsson, I. (2009). Swedish caregivers’ attitudes towards caesarean section on maternal request. Women and Birth, 22, 57–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mancuso, A., DeVivo, A., Fanara, G., Albiero, A., Priolo, A. M., Giacobbe, A., et al. (2008). Cesarean section on request: Are there loc-regional factors influencing maternal choice? An Italian experience. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 28(4), 382–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG News Release: Gallup survey reveals women ob-gyns benefit from “insider knowledge.” December 9, 2003. Available at www.acog/org/from_home?publications/press_releases/nr12-09-03-2.cfm. Accessed November 19, 2008.
  28. 28.
    Gamble, J., & Creedy, D. (2000). Women’s preference for a cesarean section: Incidence and associated factors. Birth, 28(2), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lavender, T., Hofmeyr, G. J., Neilson, J. P., Kingdon, C., Gyte, G. M. L. (2006). Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006(3). Art No. CD004660. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD00460.pub2.
  30. 30.
    Gamble, J., Creedy, D. K., McCourt, C., Weaver, J., & Beake, S. (2007). A critique of the literature on women’s request for cesarean section. Birth, 34(4), 331–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pinott, J. A., & Pinotti, M. (1994). The cesarean epidemic in South America. JSOGC, 6, 154–157.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hildingsson, I., Radestad, I., Rubertsson, C., & Waldenstrom, U. (2002). Few women wish to be delivered by cesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 618–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wiklund, I., Edman, G., Larsson, C., & Andolf, E. (2006). Personalty and mode of delivery. Acta Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 85, 1225–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wiklund, I., Edman, G., & Andolf, E. (2007). Cesarean section on maternal request. Cesarean section on maternal request: Reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 86, 451–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weaver, J. J., Statham, H., & Richards, M. (2007). Are there “unnecessary cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications. Birth, 34(1), 32–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Robson, S., Carey, A., Mishra, R., & Dear, K. (2008). Elective cesarean delivery at maternal request: A preliminary study of motivations influencing women’s decision-making. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 48, 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kingdon, C., Neilson, J., Singleton, V., Gyte, G., Hart, A., Gabbay, M., et al. (2009). Choice and birth method: Mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request. BJOG, 116, 886–895.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pevzner, L., Goffman, D., Comerford, M., & Dayal, A. K. (2008). Patients’ attitudes associated with cesarean delivery on maternal request in an urban population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 198(5), e35–e37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kenton, K., Brincat, C., Mutone, M., & Brubaker, L. (2005). Repeat cesarean section and primary elective cesarean section: Recently trained obstetrician-gynecologist practice patterns and opinions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 192, 1872–1876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Russo, C. A., Andrews, R. M. Potentially avoidable injuries to mothers and newborns during childbirth, 2006. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Statistical Brief #74. May 2009. Available at www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb74.jsp Accessed November 15, 2010.
  41. 41.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2010). Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin # 115. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116(2), 450–463.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie T. Romero
    • 1
  • Carol C. Coulson
    • 1
  • Shelley L. Galvin
    • 1
  1. 1.MAHEC Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAshevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations