The Concurrent and Longitudinal Effects of Child Disability Types and Health on Family Experiences
- First Online:
- 645 Downloads
This study examines the concurrent and longitudinal effects of children’s disability types and health on family experiences, namely, parent divorce, mother’s unemployment, and receipt of social welfare. The parent and school staff survey data for 1999 and 2004 from the Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study were analyzed, when the ages of children with disabilities ranged from 6 to 17. Weighted logistic regressions using Taylor Series Linearization were used to model the concurrent associations and longitudinal association between children’s disability types and health and family experiences. Models were adjusted to account for other children in the family with disabilities, sociodemographic characteristics, and other family experiences variables. Family experiences varied significantly by disability type in 1999. Compared with families of children with learning disabilities, parents of children with emotional disturbances were 81% more likely to get divorced, and 2.5 times more likely to receive welfare from 1999 to 2004. Mothers of children with a secondary disability were 81% more likely to be unemployed than those of children without a secondary disability. These findings indicate that specific disability types in children have an influence on family experience, and that some of those influences may persist over time. Families of children with emotional disturbances appear to be particularly at risk for negative family experiences. Clinicians, educators, and policymakers should be aware of the complex needs of families of children with disabilities when considering the types of services and supports provided to both children with disabilities and their families.
KeywordsChildren with disabilities Child health Divorce Employment Social welfare
- 1.United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. (2008). The national survey of children with special health care needs chartbook 2005–2006. Rockville, Maryland: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- 2.Wang, Q. (2005). Disability and American families: 2000. (CENSR-23). Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- 4.Maisch, A., Rosenzweig, M., & Brennan, E. M. (2008). Disabilities and work-family challenges: Parents having children with special health care needs. Retrieved from http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/encyclopedia_template.php?id=14822.
- 8.Freedman, R. I., Litchfield, L. C., & Warfield, M. E. (1995). Balancing work and family: Perspectives of parents of children with developmental disabilities. Families in Society, 76, 507–514.Google Scholar
- 29.SRI International. (1998). Special education elementary longitudinal study: What do stakeholders want and need to know? Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
- 30.Godard, P., McCracken, M., Rollins, J., et al. (2007). Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study data documentation and dictionary: Volume one. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
- 31.Javitz, H., Blackorby, J., Wagner, M., et al. (2007). Methodological volume in support of the SEELS comprehensive report, what makes a difference? Influences on outcomes for students with disabilities: SEELS sampling, data collection, and analysis procedure. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
- 32.Knoblauch, B., & Sorenson, B. (1998). IDEA’s Definition of disabilities. Arlington, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children (ERIC EC Digest #E560). Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/1999-4/ideas.htm.
- 35.Corman, H., Noonan, K., & Reichman, N. E. (2005). Mothers’ labor supply in fragile families: The role of child health. Eastern Economic Journal, 31, 601–616.Google Scholar