Who Participates in State Sponsored Medicaid Enhanced Prenatal Services?

  • Lee Anne RomanEmail author
  • Cristian I. Meghea
  • Jennifer E. Raffo
  • H. Lynette Biery
  • Shelby Berkowitz Chartkoff
  • Qi Zhu
  • Susan M. Moran
  • Wm. Thomas Summerfelt


Medicaid insures an estimated 43% of all births in Michigan and provides additional funding for enhanced prenatal services (EPS). The objectives of this study are to report on the (1) use of statewide administrative data to examine risk characteristics and EPS enrollment of Medicaid-insured pregnant women in Michigan; and (2) presence and extent of a broad range of risk factors in a sample of EPS participants in Michigan, using a newly developed two-tier, risk screener and assessment tool. This study uses Vital Records, Medicaid and other data to describe EPS participation by maternal risks in the statewide population of Medicaid-insured pregnant women (54,582 in the fiscal year 2005). The screener study data is a convenience sample of 2,203 women screened between February 2005 and October 2007. The administrative data indicates that 26% of Medicaid-eligible pregnant women had EPS contact. Most women with health behavior risks, such as smoking and drug use, had no contact with EPS (68–72%). Approximately 58% of all Medicaid-insured women had zero to two co-occurring risks, while 42% had three or more of the analyzed risks. Among screened women who smoke, 9% smoked more than a pack a day. Approximately 34% of women with a depression screen scored in the moderately or severely depressed range. The results of this study suggest great opportunity for EPS enhancement by improving the capacity to identify and engage women with modifiable risks, match interventions to specific health problems, and deliver services at an intensity warranted by the risk level.


Medicaid Pregnancy Enhanced prenatal services Risk screening and assessment Low-income 



This work was supported by the Michigan Department of Community Health. Thank you to Sandra Townsend, project coordinator, and the local EPS providers for their assistance with data collection and guidance: Kent County Health Department, District Health Department #10, Benzie-Leelanau District Health Department, Genesee County Health Department, Grand Traverse County Health Department, Ingham County Health Department, Northwest Michigan Community Health Agency, Priority Health Services, Inc. Thank you also to Grand Rapids Medical Education & Research Center and Grand Valley State University, both contractual partners in the MFMP project.


  1. 1.
    Kaiser Family Foundation. (2007). Women’s issue brief: An update on women’s health policy. Medicaid’s role for women, October 2007. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gold, R. B., Singh, S., & Frost, J. (1993). The Medicaid eligibility expansions for pregnant women: Evaluating the strength of state implementation efforts. Family Planning Perspectives, 25(5), 196–207. doi: 10.2307/2136072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Silva, R., Thomas, M., Caetano, R., & Aragaki, C. (2006). Preventing low birth weight in Illinois: Outcomes of the Family Case Management Program. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 10(6), 481–488. doi: 10.1007/s10995-006-0133-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Korenbrot, C. C., Wong, S. T., & Stewart, A. L. (2005). Health promotion and psychosocial services and women’s assessments of interpersonal prenatal care in Medicaid Managed Care. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 9(2), 135–149. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-4871-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander, G. R., Hulsey, T. C., Foley, K., Keller, E., & Cairns, K. (1997). An assessment of the use and impact of ancillary prenatal care services to Medicaid women in Managed Care. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 1(3), 139–149. doi: 10.1023/A:1026204527786.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilkinson, D. S., Korenbrot, C. C., & Greene, J. (1998). A performance indicator of psychosocial services in enhanced prenatal care of Medicaid-eligible women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2(3), 131–143. doi: 10.1023/A:1021823009297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ricketts, S. A., Murray, E. K., & Schwalberg, R. (2005). Reducing low birthweight by resolving risks: Results from Colorado’s Prenatal Plus Program. American Journal of Public Health, 95(11), 1952–1957.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buescher, P. A., Roth, M. S., Williams, D., & Goforth, C. M. (1991). An evaluation of the impact of maternity care coordination on Medicaid birth outcomes in North Carolina. American Journal of Public Health, 81(12), 1625–1629.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joyce, T. (1999). Impact of augmented prenatal care on birth outcomes of Medicaid recipients in New York City. Journal of Health Economics, 18(1), 31–67. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00027-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piper, J. M., Ray, W. A., & Griffin, M. R. (1990). Effects of Medicaid eligibility expansion on prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in Tennessee. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(17), 2219–2223. doi: 10.1001/jama.264.17.2219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reichman, N. E., & Florio, M. J. (1996). The effects of enriched prenatal care services on Medicaid birth outcomes in New Jersey. Journal of Health Economics, 15, 455–476. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00491-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harrison, P. A., & Sidebottom, A. C. (2008). Systematic prenatal screening for psychosocial risks. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 19, 258–276. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2008.0003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gueorguieva, R. V., Sarkar, N. P., Carter, R. L., Ariet, M., Roth, J., & Resnick, M. B. (2003). A risk assessment screening test for very low birth weight. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 7(2), 127–136. doi: 10.1023/A:1023821127953.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moolchan, E. T., Radzius, A., Epstein, D. H., Uhl, G., Gorelick, D. A., Cadet, J. L., et al. (2002). The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Do they diagnose the same smokers? Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 101–113. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00171-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    DiClemente, C. C., Prochaska, J. O., Fairhurst, S. K., Velicer, W. F., Velasquez, M. M., & Rossi, J. S. (1991). The process of smoking cessation: An analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(2), 295–304. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.2.295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wright, R. J., Cohen, S., Carey, V., Weiss, S. T., & Gold, D. R. (2002). Parental stress as a predictor of wheezing in infancy: A prospective birth-cohort study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 165(3), 358–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clements, K. M., Barfield, W. D., Kotelchuck, M., Lee, K. G., & Wilber, N. (2006). Birth characteristics associated with early intervention referral, evaluation for eligibility, and program eligibility in the first year of life. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 10, 433–441. doi: 10.1007/s10995-006-0080-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2003). The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener. Medical Care, 41(11), 1284–1292. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sokol, R., Martier, S., & Ager, J. (1989). The T-ACE questions: Practical prenatal detection of risk-drinking. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 160(4), 863–868. discussion 8–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murray, D., & Cox, J. (1990). Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 8, 99–107. doi: 10.1080/02646839008403615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2008). Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Questionnaire: Phase 5 (2004–2007) core questions. Retrieved March 2008, from
  23. 23.
    Mullen, P., Carbonari, J., Tabak, E., & Glenday, M. (1991). Improving disclosure of smoking by pregnant women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165(2), 409–413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feldhaus, K. M., Koziol-McLain, J., Amsbury, H. L., Norton, I. M., Lowenstein, S. R., & Abbott, J. T. (1997). Accuracy of 3 brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(17), 1357–1361. doi: 10.1001/jama.277.17.1357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McFarlane, J., Parker, B., Soeken, K., & Bullock, L. (1992). Assessing for abuse during pregnancy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 3176–3178. doi: 10.1001/jama.267.23.3176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    United States Department of Agriculture. (2008). Measuring food security in the United States: Guide to measuring household food security. Retrieved March 2008, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee Anne Roman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cristian I. Meghea
    • 2
  • Jennifer E. Raffo
    • 3
  • H. Lynette Biery
    • 2
  • Shelby Berkowitz Chartkoff
    • 4
  • Qi Zhu
    • 2
  • Susan M. Moran
    • 5
  • Wm. Thomas Summerfelt
    • 6
  1. 1.The College of Human Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Health Care StudiesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Grand Rapids Medical Education and Research Center for Health ProfessionsGrand RapidsUSA
  4. 4.Community Research InstituteGrand Valley State UniversityGrand RapidsUSA
  5. 5.Bureau of Medicaid Program Operations and Quality AssuranceMichigan Department of Community HealthLansingUSA
  6. 6.Center for Health and Social Sciences and the Department of MedicineUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations