Source of Antenatal Care Influences Facility Delivery in Rural Tanzania: A Population-Based Study

  • Peter C. Rockers
  • Mark L. Wilson
  • Godfrey Mbaruku
  • Margaret E. Kruk
Article

Abstract

Objective While antenatal care does not directly contribute to reducing maternal mortality, it may play an indirect role by encouraging women to deliver with a skilled birth attendant or in a health facility. We investigated whether the frequency of visits and select characteristics of antenatal care were associated with facility delivery. Methods We selected a population-representative sample of households in a rural district of western Tanzania. Women who had given birth within five years were asked about their most recent delivery and antenatal care. Results Of 1,204 women interviewed, 1,195 (99.3%) made at least one antenatal care visit, while only 438 (36.4%) delivered in a health facility. In adjusted analysis, women were significantly more likely to deliver in a health facility if they attended antenatal care at a government health center (OR 3.17, 95% CI: 1.60–6.30) or a mission facility (OR 2.87, 95% CI: 1.36–6.07), rather than a government dispensary. Women were significantly less likely to deliver in a health facility if their nearest health facility was outside their village (OR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22–0.66). Conclusion Though facility utilization for antenatal care is frequent, most women who accessed antenatal care did not deliver in a health facility. Women who obtained antenatal care at higher level government facilities or mission facilities, which offered better quality of care, were more likely to deliver in any facility. Improving the quality of antenatal care may improve the health of mothers through encouraging women to return to facilities for delivery.

Keywords

Maternal health services Antenatal care Child delivery care Maternal mortality 

References

  1. 1.
    Freedman, L. W. M., Waldman, R., Chowdhury, M., & Rosenfield, A. (2004). Millennium project task force 4 child health and maternal health: Interim report. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khan, K. S., Wojdyla, D., Say, L., Gulmezoglu, A. M., & Van Look, P. F. (2006). WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: A systematic review. Lancet, 367(9516), 1066–1074. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell, O. M., & Graham, W. J. (2006). Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: Getting on with what works. Lancet, 368(9543), 1284–1299. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kerber, K. J., de Graft-Johnson, J. E., Bhutta, Z. A., Okong, P., Starrs, A., & Lawn, J. E. (2007). Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: From slogan to service delivery. Lancet, 370(9595), 1358–1369. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61578-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Implementation of the UN Millennium Declaration Report of the UN Secretary General. (2004). Report number A/59/282. New York: The United Nations General Assembly 27 August.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Villar, J., & Bergsjo, P. (1997). Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care. I. Philosophy, recent studies, and power to eliminate or alleviate adverse maternal outcomes. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 76(1), 1–14. doi:10.3109/00016349709047778.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Villar, J., Ba’aqeel, H., Piaggio, G., Lumbiganon, P., Miguel Belizan, J., Farnot, U., et al. (2001). WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet, 357(9268), 1551–1564. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04722-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Darmstadt, G. L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cousens, S., Adam, T., Walker, N., & de Bernis, L. (2005). Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet, 365(9463), 977–988. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71088-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barber, S. (2006). Does the quality of prenatal care matter in promoting skilled institutional delivery? A study in rural Mexico. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 10(5), 419–425. doi:10.1007/s10995-006-0079-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bloom, S. S., Lippeveld, T., & Wypij, D. (1999). Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery? A study in urban Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Policy and Planning, 14(1), 38–48. doi:10.1093/heapol/14.1.38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stephenson, R., Baschieri, A., Clements, S., Hennink, M., & Madise, N. (2006). Contextual influences on the use of health facilities for childbirth in Africa. American Journal of Public Health, 96(1), 84–93. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.057422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Health Organization. (2007). Maternal mortality in 2005: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Bureau of Statistics.Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania, ORC Macro Calverton, Maryland, USA. (2005). Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Bureau of Statistics.Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania, ORC Macro Calverton, Maryland, USA. (2006). Tanzania Service Provision Assessment Survey.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    National Bureau of Statistics. Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania. (2008). 2002 Tanzania Census.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dovlo, D. (2004). Using mid-level cadres as substitutes for internationally mobile health professionals in Africa. A desk review. Human Resources for Health, 2(1), 7. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-2-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Research Triangle Institute. (2005). SUDAAN. 9.0.3 ed. Research Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gilson, L. (1995). Management and health care reform in sub-Saharan Africa. Social Science and Medicine, 40(5), 695–710. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)E0111-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    World Health Organization. (2007). Standards for Maternal and Neonatal Care.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leonard, K. (2007). Learning in health care: Evidence of learning about clinican quality in Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55, 531–555. doi:10.1086/511192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thind, A., Mohani, A., Banerjee, K., & Hagigi, F. (2008). Where to deliver? Analysis of choice of delivery location from a national survey in India. BMC Public Health, 8(29), 29. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chowdhury, M. E., Ronsmans, C., Killewo, J., Anwar, I., Gausia, K., Das-Gupta, S., et al. (2006). Equity in use of home-based or facility-based skilled obstetric care in rural Bangladesh: an observational study. Lancet, 367(9507), 327–332. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68070-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anwar, I., Sami, M., Akhtar, N., Chowdhury, M. E., Salma, U., Rahman, M., et al. (2008). Inequity in maternal health-care services: Evidence from home-based skilled-birth-attendant programmes in Bangladesh. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86, 252–259. doi:10.2471/BLT.07.042754.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mrisho, M., Schellenberg, J. A., Mushi, A. K., Obrist, B., Mshinda, H., Tanner, M., et al. (2007). Factors affecting home delivery in rural Tanzania. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 12(7), 862–872.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter C. Rockers
    • 1
  • Mark L. Wilson
    • 1
  • Godfrey Mbaruku
    • 2
  • Margaret E. Kruk
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology, School of Public HealthUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Ifakara Health Research and Development CentreDar-es-salaamTanzania
  3. 3.Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public HealthUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Averting Maternal Death and Disability Program, Heilbrunn Department of Population & Family Health, Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations