Maternal and Child Health Journal

, 13:641

Differences in Contraceptive Use Across Generations of Migration Among Women of Mexican Origin

Article

Abstract

Objectives To explore differences in contraceptive use among women of Mexican origin across generations of migration. Methods Logit models were used to assess contraceptive use among 1,830 women of Mexican origin in Cycles 5 (1995) and 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Analyses were stratified by age. Initial models controlled for survey year and underlying differences across generations of migration in age and parity; subsequent models added a range of potential mediating variables. Models account for significant interactions between generation of migration and parity. Results Among women under age 30 who have not yet had any children, women in their twenties with parity 3 or more, and women 30 or older with parity 1 or 2, those born in the US are much more likely to use contraception than immigrant women. For other levels of parity, there are no significant differences in contraceptive use across generations of migration. Generational differences in marital status, socio-economic status, health insurance coverage, and catholic religiosity did little to mediate the association between generation of migration and contraceptive use. Conclusions Among women of Mexican origin, patterns of contraceptive use among first-generation immigrants and women of generation 1.5 are similar to those of women in Mexico, with very low rates of contraceptive use among young women who have not yet had a child. Further research is needed to investigate the extent to which this pattern is due to fertility preferences, contraceptive access, or concerns about side effects and infertility. Patterns of contraceptive use appear to change more slowly with acculturation than many other factors, such as education, income, and work force participation.

Keywords

Contraception Acculturation Immigration Mexican Hispanic 

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). The American community—Hispanics: 2006. http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hispanic/cps2006/CPS_Powerpoint_2006.pdf.
  2. 2.
    Zambrana, R. E., Scrimshaw, S. C., Collins, N., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1997). Prenatal health behaviors and psychosocial risk factors in pregnant women of Mexican origin: The role of acculturation. American Journal of Public Health, 87(6), 1022–1026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh, G. K., & Yu, S. M. (1996). Adverse pregnancy outcomes: Differences between US- and foreign-born women in major US racial and ethnic groups. American Journal of Public Health, 86(6), 837–843.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guendelman, S., & English, P. B. (1995). Effect of United States residence on birth outcomes among Mexican immigrants: An exploratory study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 14(9 Suppl), S30–S38.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Montez, J. K., & Eschback, K. (2008). Country of birth and language are uniquely associated with intakes of fat, fiber, and fruits and vegetables among Mexican-American women in the United States. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 108(3), 473–480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harley, K., Stamm, N. L., & Eskenazi, B. (2007). The effect of time in the U.S. on the duration of breastfeeding in women of Mexican descent. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11(2), 119–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006). Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 90–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson, E. K. (2008). Acculturation and changes in the likelihood of pregnancy and feelings about pregnancy among women of Mexican origin. Women and Health, 47, 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Canto, M. T., & Shankar, S. (2000). Utilization of routine medical services among immigrants from El Salvador. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 11, 125–134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Derose, K. P. (2000). Limited English proficiency and Latinos’ use of physician services. Medical Care Research and Review: MCRR, 57, 76–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Solis, J. M., Marks, G., Garcia, M., & Shelton, D. (1990). Acculturation, access to care, and use of preventive services by Hispanics: Findings from HHANES 1982–84. American Journal of Public Health, 80(Suppl), 11–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zuvekas, S. H., & Weinick, R. M. (1999). Changes in access to care, 1977–1996: The role of health insurance. Health Services Research, 34(1 Pt 2), 271–279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guendelman, S., Denny, C., Mauldon, J., & Chetkovich, C. (2000). Perceptions of hormonal contraceptive safety and side effects among low-income Latina and non-Latina women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 4(4), 233–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilliam, M. L., Warden, M., Goldstein, C., & Tapia, B. (2004). Concerns about contraceptive side effects among young Latinas: A focus-group approach. Contraception, 70(4), 299–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hirsch, J. S. (2003). A courtship after marriage: Sexuality and love in Mexican transnational families. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sangi-Haghpeykar, H., Ali, N., Posner, S., & Poindexter, A. N. (2006). Disparities in contraceptive knowledge, attitude and use between Hispanic and non-Hispanic whites. Contraception, 74(2), 125–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Romo, L. F., Berenson, A. B., & Segars, A. (2003). Sociocultural and religious influences on the normative contraceptive practices of Latino women in the United States. Contraception, 69, 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Unger, J. B., & Molina, G. B. (1998). Contraceptive use among Latina women: Social, cultural, and demographic correlates. Women’s Health Issues, 8(6), 359–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guendelman, S., Malin, C., Herr-Harthorn, B., & Vargas, P. N. (2001). Orientations to motherhood and male partner support among women in Mexico and Mexican-origin women in the United States. Social Science and Medicine, 52(12), 1805–1813.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guendelman, S., Gould, J. B., Hudes, M., & Eskenazi, B. (1990). Generational differences in perinatal health among the Mexican American population: Findings from HHANES 1982–84. American Journal of Public Health, 80(Suppl), 61–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pew Hispanic Center/Kaiser Family Foundation. (2002). 2002 National survey of latinos: Summary of findings. Menlo Park, CA and Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scribner, R., & Dwyer, J. H. (1989). Acculturation and low birth weight among Latinos in the Hispanic HANES. American Journal of Public Health, 79(9), 1263–1267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Groves, R. M., Benson, G., Mosher, W. D., et al. (2005). Plan and operation of cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital & health statistics, 1(42). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_01/sr01_042.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2008.
  24. 24.
    Amaro, H. (1988). Women in the Mexican-American community: Religion, culture, and reproductive attitudes and experiences. Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mosher, W. D., Johnson, D. P., & Horn, M. C. (1986). Religion and fertility in the United States: The importance of marriage patterns and Hispanic origin. Demography, 23(3), 367–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shorto, R. (2006). Contra-contraception: A growing number of conservatives see birth control as part of an ailing culture that overemphasizes sex and devalues human life. Is this the beginning of the next culture war? The New York Times Magazine, 76(2), 48–55, 68, 83.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2001). Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Triangle Health Economics Working Paper No. 2. http://ssrn.com/abstract=303862 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.303862. Accessed 15 Mar 2008.
  29. 29.
    Norton, E. C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. The Stata Journal, 4(2), 154–167.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Consejo Nacional de Población. (2000). Cuadernos de Salud Reproductiva: República de México. Mexico: CONAPO.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chandra, A., Martinez, G. M., Mosher, W. D., Abma, J. C., & Jones, J. (2005). Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics, 23(25), 175 pp. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_025.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2007.
  32. 32.
    Wilson, E. K., & McQuiston, C. (2006). Motivations for pregnancy planning among Mexican immigrant women in North Carolina. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 10(3), 311–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Institute of Medicine. (1995). In S. S. Brown & L. Eisenberg (eds.), The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jones, R. K., Darroch, J. E., & Henshaw, S. K. (2002). Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000–2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34(6), 294–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Amuchástegui, A. (1998). La dimensión moral de la sexualidad y de la virginidad en las culturas híbridas mexicanas. Relaciones, 19(74), 101–138.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    González-López, G. (2005). Erotic journeys: Mexican immigrants and their sex lives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zavella, P. (1997). Playing with fire: The gendered construction of Chicana/Mexicana sexuality. In R. N. Lancaster & M. di Leonardo (Eds.), The gender sexuality reader: Culture, history, political economy (pp. 392–408). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (1994). Gendered transitions: Mexican experiences of immigration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RTI InternationalResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations