Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 334–342

Development and Validation of the Infant Feeding Intentions Scale

Article

Abstract

Objectives There is a need in breastfeeding behavior studies for a quantitative measure of maternal breastfeeding intentions. The Infant Feeding Intentions (IFI) scale was developed to fill this need. Methods Two items probe strength of intentions to initiate breastfeeding and subsequent items assess strength of intentions to be breastfeeding exclusively (EBF) at 1, 3, or 6 months. Total score ranges from 0 to 16. Content validity was established among women in their third trimester of pregnancy (n = 88). Subsequently, construct validity was assessed in a low-income, multi-ethnic cohort of primiparae (n = 170) interviewed at 25 ± 15 h postpartum and followed to 6 months. Results Cronbach’s coefficient alpha was 0.90 for both the content and construct validity samples. Construct validity was demonstrated by a significant association between IFI score and both planned and actual EBF duration: mean (+standard deviation) IFI scores were 4.6 ± 2.9, 7.5 ± 3.2, 10.3 ± 2.7, 12.0 ± 1.8, and 13.8 ± 2.7 for planned duration of EBF of ‘Never’, up to 1 month, 1 to <3 months, 3 to <6 months, and ≥6 months, respectively; ANOVA, P < 0.0001; and each 1-point increase in IFI score decreased the hazard of not EBF by 23.4% at day 0 and 13.7% at day 30 (Cox proportional hazards model chi-square = 92.5, P < 0.0001). Conclusions In a multi-ethnic U.S. sample of low-income primiparae, the IFI scale was shown to be a valid, simple tool for quantitatively assessing the strength of intentions to initiate and sustain EBF.

Keywords

Breastfeeding Infant feeding intentions Scale validation Assessment Exclusive breastfeeding duration 

References

  1. 1.
    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duckett, L., Henly, S., Avery, M., et al. (1998). A theory of planned behavior-based structural model for breast-feeding. Nursing Research, 47(6), 325–336 doi:10.1097/00006199-199811000-00006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wells, K.J., Thompson, N.J., Kloeblen-Tarver, A.S. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and intention to breast-feed. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26(2), 111–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kloeblen-Tarver, A.S., Thompson, N.J., Miner, K.R. (2002). Intent to breast-feed: The impact of attitudes, norms, parity, and experience. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26(3), 182–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manstead, A. S. R., Plevin, C. E., Smart, J. L. (1984). Predicting mothers choice of infant feeding method. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 223–231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kloeblen, A. S., Thompson, N. J., & Miner, K. R. (1999). Predicting breast-feeding intention among low-income pregnant women: A comparison of two theoretical models. Health Education & Behavior, 26(5), 675–688. doi:10.1177/109019819902600508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Humphreys, A. S., Thompson, N. J., & Miner, K. R. (1998). Assessment of breastfeeding intention using the transtheoretical model and the theory of reasoned action. Health Education Research, 13(3), 331–341. doi:10.1093/her/13.3.331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wambach, K. (1997). Breastfeeding intention and outcome: A test of the theory of planned behavior. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 51–59. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199702)20:1 ≤ 51::AID-NUR6 ≥ 3.0.CO;2-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manstead, A. S. R., Proffitt, C., & Smart, J. L. (1983). Predicting and understanding mothers’ infant-feeding intentions and behavior: Testing the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(4), 657–671. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ryser, F. G. (2004). Breastfeeding attitudes, intention, and initiation in low-income women: The effect of the best start program. Journal of Human Lactation, 20(3), 300–305. doi:10.1177/0890334404266985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    DiGirolamo, A., Thompson, N., Martorell, R., et al. (2005). Intention or experience? Predictors of continued breastfeeding. Health Education & Behavior, 32(2), 208–226. doi:10.1177/1090198104271971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donath, S., & Amir, L. (2003). The ALSPAC study team. Relationship between prenatal infant feeding intention and initiation and duration of breastfeeding: A cohort study. Acta Paediatrica, 92, 352–356. doi:10.1080/08035250310009293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Göksen, F. (2002). Normative vs. attitudinal considerations in breastfeeding behavior: Multifaceted social influences in a developing country context. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 1743–1753. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00145-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sibeko, L., Dhansay, M. A., Charlton, K. E., et al. (2005). Beliefs, attitudes and practices of breastfeeding mothers from a peri-urban community in South Africa. Journal of Human Lactation, 21(1), 31–38. doi:10.1177/0890334404272388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    World Health Organization. (2001). Infant and young child nutrition. World Health Organization, Fifty-fourth world health assembly, 1–4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    American Academy of Pediatrics section on breastfeeding. (2005). Policy statement. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics, 115(2), 496–506. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). Breastfeeding data and statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/.
  19. 19.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2007). Healthy people 2010 midcourse review, http://www.healthypeople.gov/data/midcourse.
  20. 20.
    Labbok, M., & Krasovec, K. (1990). Toward consistency in breastfeeding definitions. Studies in Family Planning, 21(4), 226–230. doi:10.2307/1966617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hill, P.D., Humenick, S.S., Brennan, M.L., Woolley, D. (1997). Does early supplementation affect long-term breastfeeding? Clinical Pediatrics, 36(6), 345–360. doi:10.1177/000992289703600606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sheehan, D., Krueger, P., Watt, S., et al. (2001). The Ontario mother and infant survey: Breastfeeding outcomes. Journal of Human Lactation, 17(3), 221–219. doi:10.1177/089033440101700304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Camurdan, A., Ilhan, M., Beyazova, U., et al. (2008). How to achieve long-term breast-feeding: Factors associated with early discontinuation. Public Health Nutrition, 18, 1–7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Allison, P.D. (1995). Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ahluwalia, I. B., Morrow, B., Hsia, J., & Grummer-Strawn, L. (2003). Who is breastfeeding? Recent trends from the pregnancy risk assessment and monitoring system. Pediatrics, 142(5), 486–491. doi:10.1067/mpd.2003.199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li, R., Darling, N., Maurice, E., et al. (2005). Breastfeeding rates in the United States by characteristics of the child, mother, or family: The 2002 national immunization survey. Pediatrics, 115(1), E31–E37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    American Academy of Pediatrics. (2006). Breastfeeding handbook for physicians. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chapman, D. J., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (1999). Does delayed perception of the onset of lactation shorten breastfeeding duration? Journal of Human Lactation, 15, 107–111. doi:10.1177/089033449901500207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chapman, D. J., Damio, G., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2004). Differential response to breastfeeding peer counseling within a low-income, predominantly Latina population. Journal of Human Lactation, 20(4), 389–396. doi:10.1177/0890334404269845.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NutritionUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations