Advertisement

Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 213–221 | Cite as

Using the Internet to Screen for Postpartum Depression

  • Huynh-Nhu LeEmail author
  • Deborah F. Perry
  • Xi Sheng
Article

Abstract

Objective To examine the feasibility of using the Internet to screen for postpartum depressive symptoms. Methods A total of 142 participants completed the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale on the Internet, and these findings were compared with those administered in-person by the authors of the PDSS (Beck and Gable) in recruitment sources, demographic characteristics, psychometric properties, and prevalence of significant postpartum depressive symptoms. Results Participants were more likely to be recruited through Internet websites than mailing sources in the Internet study, and participants in the in-person study were recruited through prenatal childbirth classes. A higher proportion of Hispanic and Asian women participated on the Internet compared to the in-person study. The PDSS had excellent internal consistencies and construct validity across Internet and in-person studies. The Internet sample also reported more risk for major postpartum depression (PPD) compared to the community sample (23% vs. 12%). Conclusions The Internet is a viable and feasible tool to screen for PPD. Implications for preventing and treating PPD on the Internet are discussed.

Keywords

Screening Internet Postpartum depression 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants in part from the Luther Rice Fellowship at George Washington University and the Health Resources and Services Administration/Maternal Child Health Bureau (R40 MC 02497). The authors thank Melissa Davis for the initial collaboration and data collection, and Leah Matherne and Ruth Craig for their assistance in data management.

References

  1. 1.
    Weissman, M. M., & Olfson, M. (1995). Depression in women: Implications for health care research. Science, 269, 799–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper, P. J., & Murray, L. (1995). Course and recurrence of postnatal depression: Evidence for the specificity of the diagnostic concept. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 191–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garfield, P., Kent, A., Paykel, E. S., Creighton, F. J., & Jacobson, R. R. (2004). Outcome of postpartum disorders: A 10 year follow-up of hospital admissions. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109, 434–439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wisner, K. L., Perel, J. M., Peindl, K. S., Hanusa, B. H., Piontek, C. M., & Findling, R. L. (2004). Prevention of postpartum depression: A pilot randomized clinical trial. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1290–1292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beck, C. T. (2006). Postpartum depression: It isn’t just the blues. The American Journal of Nursing, 106, 40–50.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horowitz, J. A., & Goodman, J. H. (2005). Identifying and treating postpartum depression. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 34, 264–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Segre, L. S., & O’Hara, M. W. (2005). The status of postpartum depression screening in the United States. In C. Henshaw, & S. Elliott (Eds.), Screening for perinatal depression (pp. 83–89). London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hearn, G., Iliff, A., Jones, I., Kirby, A., Ormiston, P., Parr, P., Rout, J., & Wardman, L. (1998). Postnatal depression in the community. The British Journal of General Practice, 48, 1064–1066.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    U.S. Department Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy people 2010: Understanding and improving health. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.census.gov/populations/www/cen2000/briefs.html. Accessed November 1, 2002.
  10. 10.
    Newburger, E. G. (2001). Home computers and Internet use in the United States: August 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2007.
  11. 11.
    U.S. Department of Commerce. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2005). Health information online. Washington, DC. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Healthtopics_May05.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2007.
  13. 13.
    Computer Ltd and others. (2002). NUA Internet surveys. http://www.nua.ie/surveys. Accessed January 7, 2008.
  14. 14.
    Bundorf, M. K., Wagner, T. H., Singer, S. J., & Baker, L. C. (2006). Who searches the Internet for health information? Health Research and Educational Trust, 41, 819–836.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morahan-Martin, J. M. (2004). How Internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: A cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 497–510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Card, J. J., & Kuhn, T. (2006). Development of online suites of social science-based resources for health researchers and practitioners. Social Science Computer Review, 24, 255–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2005). Technological innovations in clinical assessment and psychotherapy. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 74, 336–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Houston, T. K., Cooper, L. A., Vu, H. T., Kahn, J., Toser, J., & Ford, D. E. (2001). Screening the public for depression through the Internet. Psychiatric Services, 52, 362–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tate, D. F., & Zabinsky, M. F. (2004). Computer and Internet applications for psychological treatment: Update for clinicians. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 209–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buchanan, T. (2002). Online assessment: Desirable or dangerous? Professional Psychology-Research and Practice, 33, 148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Griffiths, K. M., & Christensen, H. (2000). Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: Cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 321, 1511–1515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Summers, A. L., & Logsdon, M. C. (2005). Websites for postpartum depression: Convenient, frustrating, incomplete, and misleading. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 30, 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Corry, M. P. (2004). Recommendations from listening to mothers: The first national U.S. survey of women’s childbearing experiences. Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care, 31, 61–65.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beck, C. T., & Gable, R. K. (2000). Postpartum depression screening scale: Development and psychometric testing. Nursing Research, 49, 272–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beck, C. T., & Gable, R. K. (2001). Further validation of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale. Nursing Research, 50, 155–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782–786.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boyd, R. C., Le, H. N., & Somberg, R. (2005). Review of screening instruments for postpartum depression. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 8, 141–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gilliss, C. L., Lee, K. A., Gutierrez, Y., Taylor, D., Beyene, Y., Neuhaus, J., & Murrell, N. (2001). Recruitment and retention of healthy minority women into community-based longitudinal research. Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 10, 77–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kelly, P. J., & Cordell, J. R. (1996). Recruitment of women into research studies: A nursing perspective. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 10(1), 25–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Im, E. O., & Chee, W. (2005). Methodological issues in the recruitment of ethnic minority subjects to research via the Internet: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42, 923–929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rhodes, S. D., Bowie, D. A., & Hergenrather, K. C. (2003). Collecting behavioural data using the World Wide Web: Considerations for researchers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 68–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Beck, C. T. (2004). Birth trauma: In the eye of the beholder. Nursing Research, 53, 28–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2006). Internet penetration and impact. Washington, DC. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Internet_Impact.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2007.
  35. 35.
    HispanicBusiness.com. (2002). Hispanic Internet use reaches 50 percent. http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?id=6135. Accessed January 7, 2008.
  36. 36.
    Zelkowitz, P., & Milet, T. H. (2001). The course of postpartum psychiatric disorders in women and their partners. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, 575–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kendell, R. E., Chalmers, J. C., & Platz, C. (1987). Epidemiology of puerperal psychoses. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 662–673.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    O’Hara M. W., Stuart, S., Gorman, L. L., & Wenzell, A. (2000). Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 1039–1045.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wisner, K. L., Perel, J. M., Peindl, K. S., & Hanusa, B. H. (2004). Timing of depression recurrence in the first year after birth. Journal of Affective Disorders, 78, 249–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Davis, R. N. (1999). Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: Comparison with traditional methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 572–577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Declercq, E. R., Sakala, C., Corry, M. P., Applebaum, S., & Risher, P. (2002). Listening to Mothers: Report of the First National U.S. Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. New York: Maternity Center Association. http://www.maternitywise.org/listeningtomothers/. Accessed August 1, 2007.
  42. 42.
    U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). State and County quick facts: District of Columbia. Washington, DC. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/11000.html. Accessed August 27, 2007.
  43. 43.
    Beck, C. T., & Gable, R. K. (2001). Comparative analysis of the performance of the Postpartum depression screening scale with two other depression instruments. Nursing Research, 50, 242–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cirgin Ellett, M. L., Lane, L., & Keffer, J. (2004). Ethical and legal issues of conducting nursing research via the Internet. Journal of Professional Nursing, 20, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wilson, J. M. (1968). Principles and practice of screening for diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.The George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations