Infant Mortality in the Lower Mississippi Delta: Geography, Poverty and Race
- 347 Downloads
The objectives of this study were to explore regional, economic and racial disparities in infant mortality rates between geographic sub-regions within the eight states containing the Delta and to test hypotheses that regional disparities would decrease over time while county poverty level and racial composition would remain significant predictors of infant mortality rates.
The study used secondary data analysis of county level rates, including descriptive statistics, hierarchical multiple regression with interaction effects and linear multiple regression. Models testing the impact of sub-regional geographic differences, percent of poverty, percent of black population and interaction effects were conducted at three time periods, the late 1970s, late 1980s and late 1990s.
In the first time period, regional differences, percent of poverty, percent of black population and the interaction of region and poverty were all predictive of infant mortality (R 2 = 0.31, P < 0.0001). In the subsequent time periods, only percent of poverty and percent of black population were significant predictors (R 2 = 0.20, P < 0.0001 and R 2 = 0.26, P < 0.0001).
During the late 1970s and early 1980s, region, poverty and racial composition of counties all played an important part in predicting life chances for infants born in these eight states. Furthermore, Central Delta infants in counties with poverty levels of 30% or greater were significantly more likely to die than infants in other areas with the same rates of poverty, even after controlling for racial composition. The impact of regional differences was no longer significant at the ends of the subsequent two decades. Both medical and policy changes during these decades may have contributed to the decreased impact of region. However, both poverty and racial composition continue as important factors, accounting for more variance in the late 1990s than a decade before.
KeywordsInfant mortality Geographical disparity Poverty Race
- 1.U.S. Department of Health, Human Services. (2000). Healthy people 2010: Understanding and improving health, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- 6.Meade, M. S., & Earickson, R. J. (2000). Medical geography. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- 8.Hayes, M. (1999). Man, disease and environmental associations: From medical geography to health inequalities. Progress in Human Geography, 23, 289–296.Google Scholar
- 10.Dartmouth Medical School, McAndrew-Cooper, M. Wennberg, J. E., Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences Staff. (1999). The Dartmouth atlas of health care. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Association.Google Scholar
- 16.Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission. (1989). Body of the nation: The interim report of the Lower Mississippi Delta Commission. Memphis, TN: LMDC.Google Scholar
- 18.Deseran, F. A., & Singleman, J. (1993). Poverty and deprivation in the Mississippi Delta: Implications of sociological research for social development in an industrial country. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 30, 81–101.Google Scholar
- 19.Brown, D. W. (Ed.) (1990). Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission. The Delta initiatives: Realizing the dream…fulfilling the potential. Memphis, TN: Mercury Printing.Google Scholar
- 21.Crecinck, J. C., & Steptoe, R. (1970). Human resources in the rural Mississippi Delta – with emphasis on the poor. Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report 170. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
- 23.Mann, A. (2000). Stroke belt: A standard of care phenomenon? Family Practice News, 30, 13.Google Scholar
- 24.The Economist. (1997). The map of well being: Geographical variations in medical care in the U.S. The Economist Newspaper Ltd., 345, 1.Google Scholar
- 25.Casper, M. L., Barnett, E., Halverson, J. A., Elmes, G. A., Braham, V. E., Majeed, A. Z., Bloom, A. S., & Stanley, S. (2000). Women and Heart Disease: An atlas of racial and ethnic disparities in mortality, Second Edition. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University.Google Scholar
- 26.U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. (2006). United States Cancer Statistics: 2003 Incidence and Mortality. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute.Google Scholar
- 27.Morgan, K. O., & Morgan, S. (Eds). Health care state rankings 2004, 12th edn. Lawrence, KS: Morgan Quitno Press.Google Scholar
- 28.Reinschmiedt, L., & Green, B. (1989). Socioeconomic conditions: The Mississippi Delta. Mississippi State, MS: Department of Information Services, Division of Agriculture, Forestry and Veterinary Medicine.Google Scholar
- 29.Farmer, F. L., & Voth, D. (1990). Life chances of residents in the Lower Mississippi Delta: A comparison of the Delta mortality profile with a national profile. Final Report to the LMDDC. Memphis, TN: Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission.Google Scholar
- 30.Congress of the United States. H.R. 2646, The Farm Security And Rural Investment Act of 2002. Subchapter VI. Delta Regional Authority. Sec. 2009aa.Google Scholar
- 35.Coulton, C., & Pandey, S. (1994). Unraveling neighborhood change using two-wave panel analysis: A case study of Cleveland in the 1980s. Social Work Research, 18, 83–96.Google Scholar
- 49.Curry, J., & Gruber, J. (1994). Saving babies: The efficacy and costs of recent expansions of Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper # 4644. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- 51.MacIntyre, S., & Ellaway, A. (2000). Ecological approaches: Rediscovering the role of the physical and social environment. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 332–348). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 55.United States Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Compressed Mortality File (CMF). compiled from CMF 1968–1988, Series 20, No. 2A 2000, CMF 1989–1998, Series 20, No. 2E 2003 and CMF 1999–2002, Series 20, No. 2H 2004 on CDC WONDER On-line Database. Available at http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/mort.html.
- 56.U.S. Census Bureau. Intercensal County Estimates by Age, Sex, Race: 1980 to 1990, Estimates of the Population of Counties in the United States by Age, Sex, and Race. Released on the Internet October 22, 2004. Available at http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/1980s/PE-02.html.
- 57.Hobbs, F., & Stoops, N. (2004). U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Special Reports, Series CENSR-4, Demographic trends in the 20th century (p. 77). Washington, DC.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- 58.U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 1. Table P 006 Race. Available online at http://factfinder.census.gov.
- 59.U.S. Census Bureau. Historical Income Tables by County. Available online at http://www.census.gov/population/www/censusdata/hiscendata.
- 60.U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF 3). Available online at http://factfinder.census.gov.
- 61.U.S. Bureau of the Census. Poverty rates, definitions and guidelines. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty.html#povdef.
- 63.Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research, 3rd edn. New York: Wadsworth Publishers.Google Scholar
- 64.Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar