Impact of the HealthChoice Program on Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth after C-Section Deliveries: A Retrospective Analysis
To assess the impact of the HealthChoice program in Maryland on cesarean section and vaginal birth after C-section deliveries.
Pre-post design using a comparison group with Maryland State Inpatient Databases, part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Although the combined 1995 and 2000 database contained over 1.2 million inpatient discharge records, the analysis included all hospital discharge abstracts for women in labor. To identify the delivery, Diagnoses-Related Groups (DRGs) 370–375 were used from the discharge data. Together, there were 128,743 births identified in both years.
Pregnant women enrolled in Medicaid managed care were compared pre-implementation and post implementation with pregnant women delivering babies under private insurance. The analysis computed difference-in-differences estimates using a logistic regression model that controlled for maternal characteristics, payment source, labor and delivery complications, and hospital characteristics. The outcome variables included Primary Cesarean, Repeat Cesarean, and Vaginal Birth after C-section.
These results suggest that Medicaid managed care enrollees were less likely to undergo cesarean section deliveries relative to privately insured beneficiaries. Medicaid MCOs may have done a better job of limiting the growth in overused procedures than did MCOs and providers for privately insured women.
This study has shown that there has been an overall increase in the use of primary and repeat cesarean sections in Maryland hospitals. However, HealthChoice limited this increase for Medicaid enrollees relative to privately insured women. On the other hand, vaginal births after C-section have declined in Maryland.
KeywordsHealthChoice Medicaid Cesarean sections Managed care
- 1.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2003). Medicaid managed care overview. Baltimore, MD. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/medicaid.
- 2.Schwalberg, R., Mathis, S. A., Giffen, M., Mohamadi, L., & Zimmerman, B., Sines, E. (2001). Medicaid coverage of perinatal services: Results of a National Survey. Menlo Park, California: Henry J. Keiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
- 4.Figura, S. Z. (1997). Maryland Medicaid marries choice and managed care. AHA News. 33(24), 6.Google Scholar
- 6.Shaugnessy, P. W., Schlenker, R. E., & Hittle, D. F. (1994). Home health care outcomes under capitated and fee-for-service payments. Health Care Financing Review, 16(1), 187–222.Google Scholar
- 9.Yelin, E. H., Criswell, L. A., & Feingenbaum, P. G. (1996). Health care utilization and outcomes among persons with rheumatoid arthritis in fee-for-service and prepaid. Group practice settings. Journal of American Medical Association, 276(13), 1048–1053.Google Scholar
- 10.Greenfield, S., Rogers, W., Mangotich, M., Carney, M. F., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Outcomes of patients with hypertension and non-insulin dependent diabetes Mellitus treated by different Systems and Specialties. Journal of American Medical Association, 274(18), 1436–1444.Google Scholar
- 20.Roohan, P. J., Anarella, J. P., & Gesten, F. C. (2004). Quality oversight and improvement in Medicaid managed care. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 10(4), 321–329.Google Scholar
- 23.Menacker, F., & Curtin, F. C. (2001). Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991–1999 (DHHS Publication No. PHS 2002–1120). Hyattsville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
- 24.Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. (2002). Care of women in U.S. hospitals, 2000 (HCUP Fact Book No. 3, AHRQ Publication No. 02-0044). Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality.Google Scholar
- 25.Cesarean Fact Sheet. ICEA Cesarean Options. Childbirth.Org. Available at: http://www.childbirth.org/section/CSFact.html .Google Scholar
- 26.University of Michigan Health System. (2004). Women’s Health Advisor 2004: Vaginal birth after a previous cesarean delivery. University of Michigan. Available at: http://www.med.umich.edu/1libr/wha/wha_vbac_crs.htm .Google Scholar
- 27.Introduction to The HCUP State Inpatient Databases. (2006). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/siddist/Introduction_to_SID.pdf .Google Scholar
- 28.Maryland Vital Statistics: Annual Report 2000. (2000). Vital statistics administration. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore, MD. Available at: http://www.vsa.state.md.us/vsa/doc/00annual.pdf .Google Scholar
- 30.American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (1997). Guidelines for perinatal care (4th ed.). Elk Grove Village, IL, and Washington DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Google Scholar
- 31.Goldfarb, M. (1984). Who receives cesareans: Patient and hospital characteristics (HCUP Research Note 4, Publication No. (PHS) 84-3345). Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- 32.Iezzoni, Lisa I. (1997). Data source and implications: Administrative database. In: Iezzoni LI (Eds.) Risk adjustment for measuring health outcomes (pp. 169–242). Chicago, Ill: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar