Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 586–594

Feasibility and Utility of Screening Adolescent Mothers for Chlamydia at their Children’s Health Care Visits

  • Sara Jumping-Eagle
  • Jeanelle Sheeder
  • Lisa S. Kelly
  • Catherine Stevens-Simon



Assess the feasibility of offering and barriers to accepting urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) among asymptomatic adolescent mothers during their children’s health care visits.


Providers were automatically cued to offer CT-screening to 13 through 21 year old mothers when they opened the child’s medical record. Recording the mothers’ screening decisions removed the flag for 6 months. Providers were also prompted to assess the perceived importance of CT prevention, likelihood of having CT, and the worst aspect of having CT.


Mothers usually brought their children to the clinic. Hence, providers could act on 97% of the 318 flags they saw. They responded appropriately 75% of the time. Only 96 (42%) of the 229 mothers who were asked agreed to screening. The primary reasons for declining were “monogamous” and “tested within 6 months”. Almost everyone said CT was a top preventive health priority, but that they would be surprised if they were infected. Mothers who agreed to screening were less likely to have a child less than 6 months of age (26.0% vs. 57.1%; P < 0.0001). They were also more likely to rate knowledge of partner infidelity (39.4% vs. 13.6%; P = 0.03) and less likely to rate medical problems (15.2% vs. 40.9%; P = 0.01) the worst aspect of having CT. None of the 21 urine samples obtained within 6 months of delivery were positive for CT. Thereafter, 5 (9.1%) of the 55 urines were positive.


It is feasible and useful to screen adolescent mothers for CT at their children’s health care visits. The best way to increase the efficacy and strengthen the impact of urine-based CT-screening in this setting is to initiate testing after the 6th postpartum month and heighten awareness of STD-risk among adolescent mothers.


Sexually transmitted diseases Preventive health screening Teen motherhood 


  1. 1.
    Stevens-Simon, C., & Sheeder, J. L. (2005). Chlamydia trachomatis: Common misperceptions and misunderstandings. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 18, 231–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oh, M. K., Cloud, G. A., Baker, S. L, et al. (1993). Chlamydial infections and sexual behavior in young pregnant teenagers. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 20, 45–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ickovics, J. R., Niccolai, L. M., Lewis, J. B., Kershaw, T. S., & Ethier, K. A. (2003). High postpartum rates of sexually transmitted infections among teens: Pregnancy as a window of opportunity for prevention. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 79, 469–473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allaire, A. D., Huddleston, J. F., Graves, W. L., & Nathan, L. (1998). Initial and repeat screening for Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6, 116–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xu, F., Schillinger, J. A., Markowitz, L. E., Sternberg, M. R., Aubin, M. R., & St Louis, M. E. (2000). Repeat Chlamydia trachomatis infection on women: Analysis through a surveillance case registry in Washington State, 1993–1998. American Journal of Epidemiology, 152, 1164–1170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahon, B. E., Rosenman, M. B., Graham, M. F., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2002). Postpartum Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186, 1320–1325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelley, M. S., Borawski, E. A., & Flocke, S. A. (2003). The role of sequential and concurrent sexual relationships in the risk of sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 296–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halpern, C. T., Halfors, D., Bauer, D. J., Iritani, B., Waller, M. W., & Cho, H. (2004). Implications of racial and gender differences in pattern of adolescent risk behavior for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 239–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    US Preventive Services Task Force. (2001). Screening for chlamydial infection: Recommendations and rationale. The American Journal of Chinese medicine, 20, 90–94.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Centers for Disease Control, Prevention, Workowski, K. A., & Berman, S. M. (2006). Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006. MMWR Recommendations and Reports., 55, 1–94.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peipert, J. F. (2003). Clinical practice. Genital chlamydial infections. The New England Journal of Medicine, 349, 2424–2430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Institute of Medicine. (1997). Sexually transmitted diseases: The hidden epidemic in confronting sexually transmitted diseases. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ford, C. A., Jaccard, J., Millstein, S. G., Bardsley, P. E., & Miller, W. C. (2004). Perceived risk of Chlamydial and Gonococcal infection among sexually experienced young adults in the United States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health., 36, 258–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weinstock, H., Berman, S., & Cates, W. Jr. (2004) Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: Incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 6–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    American College of Obstetricians, Gynecologists. (1996). Guidelines for women’s health care. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    National Committee on Quality Assurance. (2002). HEDIS 2002: Technical specifications, (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: National Committee on Quality Assurance.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    US Department of Health, Human Services. (2000). Healthy people 2010 conference Edition, (Vols. 1 and 2). Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shafer, M. A., Tebb, K. P., Pantell, R. H., Wibbelsman, C. J., Neuhaus, J. M., Tipton, A. C., Kunin, S. B., Ko, T. H., Schweppe, D. M., & Bergman, D. A. (2002). Effect of a clinical practice improvement intervention on Chlamydia screening among adolescent girls. JAMA, 288, 2846–2852.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burstein, G. R., Snyder, M. H., Conley, D., Newman, D. R., Walsh, C. M., Tao, G., & Irwin, K. L. (2005). Chlamydia screening in a health plan before and after a national performance measure introduction. Obstetrics and Gynecology., 106, 327–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huppert, J. S., Goodman, E., Khoury, J., & Slap, G. (2005). Sexually transmitted infections testing and screening in hospital-based primary care visits by women. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 105, 390–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fiscus, L. C., Ford, C. A., & Miller, W. C. (2004). Infrequency of sexually transmitted disease screening among sexually experienced US female adolescents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 233–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ford, C. A., Viadro, C. I., & Miller, W. C. (2004). Testing for chlamydial and gonorrheal infections outside of clinic settings. A summary of the literature. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 31, 38–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ford, C. A., Jaccard, J., Millstein, S. G., Viadro, C. I., Eaton, J. L., & Miller, W. C. (2004). Young adults’ attitudes, beliefs, and feelings about testing for curable STDs outside of clinic settings. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 34, 266–269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cohen, D. A., Nsuami, M., Martin, D. H., & Farley, T. A. (1999). Repeated school-based screening for sexually transmitted diseases: A feasible strategy for reaching adolescents. Pediatrics, 104, 1281–1285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stevens-Simon, C., Fullar, S. A., & McAnarney, E. R. (1989) Teenage pregnancy: Caring for adolescent mothers with their infants in pediatric settings. Clinical Pediatrics, 28, 282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stevens-Simon, C., Kelly, L., & Kulick, R. (2001). A village would be nice but it takes a long acting contraceptive to prevent repeat adolescent pregnancies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 21, 60–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leenaars, P. E. M., Rombouts, R., & Kok, G. (1993) Seeking medical care for a sexually transmitted disease: Determinants of delay-behavior. Psychology and Health, 8, 17–32.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cook, R. L., Wiesenfeld, H. C., Ashton, M. R., Krohn, M. A., Zamborsky, T., & Scholle, S. H. (2001). Barriers to screening sexually active adolescent women for chlamydia: A survey of primary care physicians. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 28, 204–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fortenberry, J. D., McFarlane, M., & Bleakely, A. (2002). Relationships of stigma and shame to gonorrhea and HIV screening. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 378–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gunn, R. A., Fitzgerald, S., & Aral, S. O. (2000). Sexually transmitted disease clinic clients at risk for subsequent gonorrhea and chlamydia infections: Possible ‘core’ transmitters. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 27, 343–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aral, S. (1999). Elimination and reintroduction of a sexually transmitted disease: Lessons to be learned? American Journal of Public Health, 89, 995–997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., Sionean, C., Crosby, R., et al. (2002). Association of adolescents’ history of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and their current high-risk behavior and STD status. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29, 503–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ellen, J. M., Vittinhoff, E., Bolan, G., Boyer, C. B., & Padian, N. S. (1999). Individuals’ perception of their sex partners’ risk for sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 328–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Buysee, A. (1998). Safer sexual decision making in stable and casual relationships: A prototype approach. Psychology and Health, 13, 55–66.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cooper, M. I., Shapiro, P., & Morrison, A. M. (1998). Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1528–1558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gebhart, W. A., Kuyper, L., & Greunsven, G. (2003). Need for imtimacy in relationships and motives for sex as determinants of adolescent condom use. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Comer, L. K., & Nemeroff, C. J. (2000). Blurring emotional and physical safety in AIDS and STD risk estimations: The casual/regular partner distinction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2467–2490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rainey, D. Y., Stevens-Simon, C., & Kaplan, D. (1993). Self-perception of infertility among adolescents. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 147, 1053–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Prazar, G. (2005). How many Pediatricians does it take to change a practice? Or how to incorporate change into practice. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159, 500–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Johnson, R. E., Newshall, W. J., & Papp, J. P. (2002). Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisserae gonorrheae infections–2002. MMWR., 15, 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Jumping-Eagle
    • 1
  • Jeanelle Sheeder
    • 1
  • Lisa S. Kelly
    • 1
  • Catherine Stevens-Simon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent MedicineUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences Center, The Children’s HospitalDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations