Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 301–306 | Cite as

Assessing the Quality of Reproductive Health Services in Egypt via Exit Interviews

  • Hassan H. M. Zaky
  • Hind A. S. Khattab
  • Dina Galal
Original Paper

Abstract

Background: This study assesses the quality of reproductive health services using client satisfaction exit interviews among three groups of primary health care units run by the Ministry of Health and Population of Egypt. Each group applied a different model of intervention. The Ministry will use the results in assessing its reproductive health component in the health sector reform program, and benefits from the strengths of other models of intervention. Methods: The sample was selected in two stages. First, a stratified random sampling procedure was used to select the health units. Then the sample of female clients in each health unit was selected using the systematic random approach, whereby one in every two women visiting the unit was approached. All women in the sample coming for reproductive health services were included in the analysis. Results: The results showed that reproductive health beneficiaries at the units implementing the new health sector reform program were more satisfied with the quality of services. Still there were various areas where clients showed significant dissatisfaction, such as waiting time, interior furnishings, cleanliness of the units and consultation time. The study showed that the staff of these units did not provide a conductive social environment as other interventions did. A significant proportion of women expressed their intention to go to private physicians owing to their flexible working hours and variety specializations. Conclusion: Beneficiaries were generally more satisfied with the quality of health services after attending the reformed units than the other types of units, but the generalization did not fully apply. Areas of weakness are identified.

Keywords

Reproductive health interventions Quality of care Assessment Exit interview Health sector reform program Egypt 

References

  1. 1.
    Ministry of Health and Population (Egypt), El-Zanaty Associates, ORC Macro. Egypt service provision assessment survey, 2002. Calverton, Maryland: Ministry of Health and Population, El-Zanaty Associates, and ORC Macro; 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khattab H. The silent endurance: social conditions of women's reproductive health in rural egypt. Amman: UNICEF; and Cairo: The Population Council; 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zurayk H, et al. Concepts and measures of reproductive morbidity. Health Transit Rev 1993;3(1):17–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Younis N, et al. A community study of gynecological and related morbidities in rural Egypt. Stud Fam Plann 1993;24(3):175–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khalil K, et al. Integrating a reproductive health framework within primary care service. The policy series in reproductive health, No. 6. Cairo, Egypt: The Population Council; 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Besinger R, Bertrand J. Monitoring quality of care in family planning programs: a comparison of observations and client exit interviews. Int Fam Plan Perspec 2001;27(2):63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knowles J, et al. Measuring results of health sector reform for system performance: a handbook of indicators. Special Initiatives, Report No. 1. Maryland, U.S.A: Abt Associates Inc; 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koenig M, et al. Quality of care within the indian family welfare programme: a review of recent evidence. Stud Fam Plann 2000;31(1):1–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simmons R, Elias C. The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues. Stud Fam Plann 1994;25(1):1–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Al-Qutob R, et al. Assessing the quality of reproductive health services. The policy series in reproductive health, No. 5. Cairo, Egypt: The Population Council; 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plann 1994;21(2):61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: the definition of quality and approaches to its measurement. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1980.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams T, et al. Measuring family planning service quality through client satisfaction exit interviews. Int Fam Plan Perspec 2000;26(2):63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Avis M, et al. Questioning patient satisfaction: an empirical investigation in two outpatient clinics. Soc Sci Med 1997;44(1):85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jing F. Health sector reform and reproductive health services in poor rural China. Health Policy Plan 2004;19(suppl_1):i40–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hassan H. M. Zaky
    • 1
  • Hind A. S. Khattab
    • 2
  • Dina Galal
    • 2
  1. 1.Social Research Center of the American University in Cairo and Faculty of Economics and Political Science at Cairo UniversityCairo University and American UniversityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Egyptian Society for Population Studies and Reproductive HealthCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations