Health Departments Do It Better: Prenatal Care Site and Prone Infant Sleep Position
- 111 Downloads
Objectives: Reduction of prone infant sleep position has been the main public health effort to reduce the incidence of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Methods: Oregon Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) surveys a stratified random sample of women after a live birth. In 1998–1999, 1867 women completed the survey (64.0% unweighted response; 73.5% weighted response). Results: Overall, 9.2% of all women “usually” chose prone infant sleep position, while 24.2% chose side and 66.5% chose supine position. Women receiving care from private physicians or HMOs more often chose prone position (10.6%) than women receiving prenatal care from health department clinics (2.5%), hospital clinics (6.1%) or other sites (8.3%). Compared to health department prenatal clinic patients, private prenatal patients were more likely to choose prone infant sleep position, adjusted odds ratio = 4.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64–13.92). Conclusions: Health Department clinics have done a better job than private physicians in educating mothers about putting infants to sleep on their backs. Providers—especially private providers—should continue to stress the importance of supine sleep position for infants.
KEY WORDSprenatal care SIDS infant sleep position infant mortality public health
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Murphy SL. Division of Vital Statistics. Deaths: Final Data for 1998. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2000 07/24/00. Table 28, pp. 89–91. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr48/nvs48_11.pdf. Accessed 03/12/04.
- 2.Oregon Department of Human Services Health Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Epidemiology, Center for Health Statistics. Oregon Vital Statistics Annual Report 1998, Mortality, Fetal and Infant Mortality, Youth Suicide Attempts. Table 7–2. http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/arpt/98v2/chapter7/7-2.pdf. Accessed 03/18/04.
- 4.Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al., Division of Vital Statistics. Births: Final Data for 2001. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2002 12/18/02. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr51/nvsr51_02.pdf. Accessed on 03/15/04.
- 5.National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. WISQARS Leading Causes of Death Reports, 1999–2001. http://webapp.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/leadcaus10.html 03/15/04. Rates were calculated by dividing the number of cases in 2001—by region, after adding the individual states’ data for that region-by the number of live-born infants in the calendar year 2001, by region.
- 8.Fleming PJ, Blair PS, Bacon C, et al. Environment of infants during sleep and risk of the sudden infant death syndrome: Results of 1993-5 case-control study for confidential inquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. Br Med J 1996;313:191–5.Google Scholar
- 14.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome—United States, 1983–1994. MMWR 1996;45(40):859–63. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Publications/mmwr/wk/mm4540.pdf. Accessed on 04/30/03.Google Scholar
- 15.Kochanek KD, Smith BL, Division of Vital Statistics. Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2002. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2004 02/11/04. Table 8, pp. 30–31. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr52/nvsr52_13.pdf. Accessed on 03/12/04.
- 24.Gibson E, Dembofsky CA, Rubin S, et al. Infant sleep position practices 2 years into the “back to sleep” campaign. Clin Pediatr 2000;39:285–9.Google Scholar
- 25.Moon RY, Omron R. Determinants of infant sleep position in an urban population. Clin Pediatr 2002;41:569–73.Google Scholar
- 26.Rainey DY, Lawless MR. Infant positioning and SIDS. Acceptance of the nonprone position among clinic mothers. Clin Pediatr 1994;33:322–4.Google Scholar
- 27.Ray BJ, Metcalf SC, Franco SM, et al. Infant sleep position instruction and parental practice: Comparison of a private pediatric office and an inner-city clinic. Pediatrics 1997;99:e12. http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/99/5/e12. Accessed on 03/27/03.Google Scholar
- 31.Rasinski KA, Kuby A, Bzdusek SA, et al. Effect of a Sudden Infant Death Syndrome risk reduction education program on risk factor compliance and information sources in primarily black urban communities. Pediatrics 2003;111:e347–54. http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/reprint/111/4/e347. Accessed on 04/11/03.Google Scholar
- 32.Oregon PRAMS First Year Report, 1998–99. Department of Human Services, Health Services, Portland, Oregon: Office of Family Health 2000: Appendix D: Weighting Scheme. http://www.dhs.state.or.us/publichealth/pch/prams/9899/9899appd.cfm. Accessed on 03/22/03