Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 265–276

A Positive Orientation Toward Early Motherhood Is Associated with Unintended Pregnancy Among New Orleans Youth

  • Aimee Afable-Munsuz
  • Ilene Speizer
  • Jeanette H. Magnus
  • Carl Kendall
Original Article

Objective: Characterizing young women's willingness to enter motherhood is critical to understanding the high rates of unintended pregnancy among women under 20 years. Our objectives were to discuss a measure called Positive Orientation towards Early Motherhood (POEM), and investigate its association with self-reported unintended pregnancy experience. Methods: We used data from 332 African-American women 13–19 years old recruited at public family planning and prenatal clinics in New Orleans. Using a series of ANOVAs and multinomial logistic regression, we assessed differences in POEM between four different outcome groups: women who were never pregnant and those who had only intended pregnancies, only unintended pregnancies and both unintended and intended pregnancies. Results: The data suggested that young women perceive pregnancy as an opportunity to assert responsibility, become closer with their families and achieve greater intimacy with their boyfriends. Multiple regression analysis indicated that this positive orientation toward early motherhood independently raised the likelihood that young women experienced unintended pregnancies. In particular, the perception that a pregnancy makes a young woman feel more responsible was associated with an increased likelihood that a young woman had only unintended pregnancies compared to no pregnancies at all. Interestingly, this perception did not differentiate young women who had only intended pregnancies from those who were never pregnant. Conclusion: When interpreting reports of unintended pregnancy, more attention should be given to young women's orientation toward early motherhood. Doing so will inform policies that address both personal and structural factors that contribute to persistently high rates of unintended pregnancy among adolescents.

KEY WORDS:

pregnancy intentions unintended pregnancy adolescent pregnancy measurement social disparities. 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Abma JC, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, et al. Teenagers in the United States: Sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2002. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics 2004;23(24).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    AGI (n.d.a). Facts in Brief: Contraceptive Use. Retrieved January 8, 2003, from http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/fb_contr_use.html.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trussel J, Vaughan B, Stanford J. Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Fam Plann Persp 1999;31(5).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrett G, Wellings K. What is a ‘planned’ pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:545–557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Santelli J, Rochat R, Hatfield-Timajchy K, et al. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Persp Sexu Repr Health 2003;35(2):94–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luker KC. A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers. Fam Plann Persp 1999;31(5).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zabin LS. Ambivalent feelings about parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use and pregnancy. Fam Plann Persp 1999;31(5).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bachrach CA, Newcomer S. Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: Distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum? Fami Plann Persp 1999;31(5).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischer R, Stanford J, Jameson P. et al. Exploring the concepts of intended, planned, and wanted pregnancy. Fami Pract 1999;48(2).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stanford JB, Hobbs R, Jameson P. et al. Defining Dimensions of Pregnancy Intendedness. Mater Child Health 2000;4(3):183–189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moos MK, Petersen R, Melvin CL. et al. Pregnant women's perspectives on intendedness of pregnancy. Women's Health Issues 1997;7(6):385–392.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Campbell AA, Mosher WD. A history of the measurement of unintended pregnancies and births. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2000;4(3):163–169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kendall C, Afable-Munsuz A, Speizer I, et al. Understanding pregnancy in a population of inner-city women in New Orleans: Results of qualitative research. Soc Sci and Medi 2005;60(2):297–311.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Speizer I, Santelli J, Afable-Munsuz A. Methods for measuring pregnancy intentions of women's first and last pregnancies. Persp Sex Repr Health 2004;36(5):198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    SAS Institute, Inc. SAS. Release 8.02. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1999.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York McGraw-Hill, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davies SL, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, et al. Pregnancy desire among disadvantaged African-American adolescent females. Am Health Beh 2003;27(1):55–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Unger JB, Molina GB, Teran L. Perceived consequences of teenage childbearing among adolescent girls in an urban sample. Ado Health 2000;26:205–212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jaccard J, Dodge T, Dittus P. Do adolescents want to avoid pregnancy? Attitudes towards pregnancy as predictors of pregnancy. Ado Health 2003;33(2):79–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brucker H, Martin A, Bearman PS. Ambivalence and Pregnancy: Adolesent attitudes, contraceptive use and pregnancy. Pers Sex Repr Health 2004;36(6):248–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zabin LS, Astone NM, Emerson MR. Do adolescents want babies? The relationship between attitudes and behavior. Res Adol 1993;3(1):67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson E. Sex codes among inner-city youth. In: Garrison J, Smith M. D, Besharov D. J., Sexuality, poverty, and the inner city. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 1994: pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burton LM. Teenage childbearing as an alternative life-course strategy in multigeneration black families. Human Nature 1990;1(2):123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    East P. Racial and ethnic differences in girls’ sexual, marital, and birth expectations. Marr Fam 1998;60:150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Furstenberg F, Morgan SP, Moore K, Peterson JL. Race differences in the timing of adolescent intercourse. Amer Soci Rev 1987;52(4):511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Geronimus AT. Teenage childbearing and social and reproductive disadvantage: The evolution of complex questions and the demise of simple answers. Family Relations 1991;40:463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Geronimus AT. Damned if you do: Culture, identity, privilege, and teenage childbearing in the United States. SocSci Med 2003;57:881–893.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    AGI. State facts about abortion: Louisiana, March 2004.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rubin V, East PL. Adolescents’ pregnancy intentions: Relations to life situations and caretaking behaviors prenatally and 2 years postpartum. Adol Health 1999;24:313–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stevens-Simon C, Kelly L, Singer D, et al. Why pregnant adolescents say they did not use contraception prior to conception. Ado Health 1996;19:48–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Joyce TJ, Kaestner R, Korenman S. The stability of pregnancy intentions and pregnancy-related maternal behaviors. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2000;4(3):171–178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bankole A, Westoff CF. The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: Evidence from Morocco. Bio Sci 1998;30(4):439–455.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Census. Sample demographic profiles, Table DP-3, U.S. Census Bureau, HHES/PHSB, 2000.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mincy R, Pouncy H, Reichert D, Richardson P. Fragile Families in Focus: How Low-Income Never Married Parents Perceive Relationships and Marriage, TANF Executive Office, Division of Administration, State of Louisiana, 2004.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weil A, Finegold K. (eds). Welfare Reform: The Next Act. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Geronimus A. Teenage childbearing and personal responsibility: an alternative view. Political Science Quarterly 1997;112(3).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    AGI. Executive summary: Teenage Sexual and Reproductive Behavior in Developed Countries: Can More Progress Be Made?, 2001.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dryfoos JG. A new strategy for preventing unintended teenage childbearing. Fam Plann Persp 1984;16(4):193–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kirby D, Coyle K. Youth development programs. Children and Youth Services Review 1997;19(5/6):437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Blum WM. Healthy youth development as model for youth health promotion. Ado Health 1998;22(5):368–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brown S, Eisenberg L. (eds.). The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Being of Children and Families. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics. National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle V. Washington, DC, 1995.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Reproductive Health. Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System, Phase 4. Atlanta, GA, 2000.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aimee Afable-Munsuz
    • 1
    • 5
  • Ilene Speizer
    • 2
  • Jeanette H. Magnus
    • 3
  • Carl Kendall
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Reproductive Health Research and PolicyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoU.S.
  2. 2.University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Public HealthDepartment of Maternal and Child HealthChapel HillU.S.
  3. 3.Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineDepartment of Community Health SciencesNew OrleansU.S.
  4. 4.Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineDepartment of International Health and DevelopmentNew OrleansU.S.
  5. 5.Center for Reproductive Health Research and PolicyUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoU.S.

Personalised recommendations