Language Policy

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

The Naivasha language policy: the language of politics and the politics of language in the Sudan

  • Ashraf Kamal Abdelhay
  • Busi Makoni
  • Sinfree Bullock Makoni
Original Paper

Abstract

This article provides a textual analysis of the Naivasha language provisions in Sudan in an attempt to explore how political discourse is manifested in each policy statement. Using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as an analytic and interpretive framework, the article argues that the Naivasha language provisions as political discourse are shaped by the historically mediated relationships between the south and north of Sudan (conceptualized as the territorially united entity before the secession of the south in 2011). In the course of the analysis, the article shows that the discourse of ‘linguistic indigenousness’ promoted by the policy is ideologically motivated. It is intertextual with the colonial Southern Policy and subsequently the discourse of self-determination as legislated in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 that has recently heralded the emergence of the southern Sudan as a new nation-state. The analysis has shown that there is a high degree of compatibility between the proposed structural system and the discourse of the language policy. This compatibility is achieved at the status planning level, yet its realization at the practical level remains to be assessed. The article concludes by arguing that a particular version of federalism seems to be the most appropriate political system advocated for in the implementation of this language policy.

Keywords

Naivasha language policy Federalism Language rights Politics of language Identity Ideology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Rahim, M. (1965). Fourteen documents on the problem of the southern Sudan. Khartoum: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  2. Ajulo, S. B. (1997). Myth and reality of law, language and international organisation in Africa: The case of African economic community. Journal of African Law, 41(1), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, G. (2008). Federalism: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beshir, M. O. (1968). The southern Sudan: Background to conflict. London: C. Hurst.Google Scholar
  5. Blommaert, J. (Ed.). (1999). Language ideological debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  6. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bob, A., & Wassara, S. (1989). The emergence of the organised political movement in southern Sudan 1946–1972. In M. A. Al-Safi (Ed.), The nationalist movement in the Sudan (pp. 295–321). Khartoum: University of Khartoum.Google Scholar
  8. Bugarski, R. (2004). Language policies in the successor states of former Yugoslvaia. Journal of Language and Politics, 3(2), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantori, L. J., & Lowrie, A. (1992). Islam, democracy, the state and the west. Summary of a lecture and round-table discussion with Hasan Turabi. Middle East Policy, 1(3), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cobarrubias, J. (1983). Ethical issues in status planning. In J. Cobarrubias & J. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning (pp. 41–85). New York: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Dallmayr, F. (1984). Language and politics: Why does language matter to political philosophy? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  12. Deng, F. (1995). War of visions: Conflict of identities in the Sudan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  13. Duchene, A., & Heller, M. (Eds.). (2007). Discourses of endangerment: Ideology and interest in the defence of languages. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  14. Fabian, J. (1986). Language and colonial power: The appropriation of Swahili in the former Belgian Congo 1880–1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  16. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  17. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Forsyth, M. (Ed.). (1989). Federalism and nationalism. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gal, S. (1998). Multiplicity and contention among language ideologies: A commentary. In B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: practice and theory (pp. 317–332). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Garang J. (1992). The call for democracy in Sudan, edited and introduced by M. Khalid, 2nd edn. London: Keagan Paul International.Google Scholar
  21. Geis, M. L. (1987). The language of politics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  24. James, W. (2008). Sudan: Majorities, minorities, and language interactions. In A. Simpson (Ed.), Language & national identity in Africa (pp. 61–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8(2), 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joseph, J. E. (2006). Language and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Joseph, J. E., & Taylor, T. (Eds.). (1990). Language ideologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Keller, G. (1983). What can language planners learn from the Hispanic experience with corpus planning in the United States? In J. Cobarrubias & J. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning (pp. 253–265). New York: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Kloss, H. (1971). Language rights of immigrant groups. International Migration Review, 5, 250–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lo Bianco, J. (2009). Critical discourse analysis (CDA) and language policy and planning (LPP): Constraints and applications of the critical in language planning. In T. Le, Q. Le, & M. Short (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 101–119). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Macías, R. F. (1979). Language choice and human rights in the United States. In J. E. Alatis & G. R. Tucker (Eds.), Georgetown university round table on languages and linguistics (pp. 86–101). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mahmud, U. (1983). Arabic in the southern Sudan: History and spread of a pidgin-creole. Khartoum: FAL Advertising and Print Co.Google Scholar
  33. Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (Eds.). (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  34. May, S. (2001). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism, and the politics of language. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  35. McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., & Chen, L. (1976). Freedom from discrimination in choice of language and international human rights. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 1, 151–174.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, C. (2003). Linguistic policies and the issue of ethno-linguistic minorities in the Middle East. In A. Usuki & H. Kato (Eds.), Islam in the Middle Eastern studies: Muslims and minorities (pp. 149–174). JCAS symposium series 7, Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
  37. O’Leary, B. (2001). An iron law of nationalism and federation? A (neo-Diceyian) theory of the necessity of a federal Staatsvolk, and of consociational rescue. Nations and Nationalism, 7(3), 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pelinka, A. (2007). Language as a political category: The viewpoint of political science. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(1), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Phillips, L., & Jørgensen, M. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.Google Scholar
  43. Ruiz, R. (1990). Official languages and language planning. In K. L. Adams & D. T. Brink (Eds.), Perspectives on official English: The campaign for English as the official language of the USA (pp. 11–24). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  44. Sanderson, L., & Sanderson, N. (1981). Education, religion and politics in southern Sudan 1899–1964. London: Ithaca Press.Google Scholar
  45. Scarino, A., & Papademetre, L. (2001). Ideologies, languages, policies: Australia’s ambivalent relationship with learning to communicate in ‘other’ languages. In J. Lo Bianco & R. Wickert (Eds.), Australian policy activism in language and literacy (pp. 305–325). Melbourne: Language Australia.Google Scholar
  46. Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Sharkey, H. (2008). Arab identity and ideology in Sudan: The politics of language, ethnicity and race. African Affairs, 107(426), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stevenson, R. C. (1971). The significance of the Sudan in linguistic research: Past, present and future. In Y. F. Hasan (Ed.), Sudan in Africa (pp. 11–25). Khartoum: Khartoum University Press.Google Scholar
  50. The Comprehensive peace agreement between the Government of the Republic of Sudan and the Sudan’s People’s Liberation Movement/Sudan People’s Liberation Army. (2005). Accessed August 24, 2010, from http://www.sd.undp.org/doc/CPA.pdf.
  51. Tollefson, J. W. (1981). Centralised and decentralised language planning. Language Problems and Language Planning, 5(2), 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  53. Tollefson, J. W. (2002). Conclusion: Looking outward. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education (pp. 327–337). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  54. Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Tupas, T. R. (2003). History, language planners, and strategies of forgetting: The problem of consciousness in Philippines. Language Problems and Language Planning, 27(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  58. van Dijk, T. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17(2), 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wickert, R. (2001). Politics, activism and processes of policy production: Adult literacy in Australia. In J. Lo Bianco & R. Wickert (Eds.), Australian policy activism in language and literacy (pp. 67–84). Melbourne: Language Australia.Google Scholar
  61. Williams, G. (1992). Sociolinguistics: A sociological critique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Woolard, K. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 3–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wright, S. (2004). Language policy and language planning: From nationalism to globalisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  65. Young, J. (2005). John Garang’s legacy to the peace process, the SPL/A and the south. Review of African Political Economy, 32(106), 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashraf Kamal Abdelhay
    • 1
  • Busi Makoni
    • 2
  • Sinfree Bullock Makoni
    • 2
  1. 1.Clare Hall CollegeUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Department of Applied Linguistics and African & African American Studies, College of the Liberal ArtsPennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations