Language Policy

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 243–259

A market of accents

Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper describes the cultural semantics of internet courses in American accent. Such courses are offered by corporate providers to specific groups of customers: people in search of success in the globalized business environment. The core of such courses is an order of indexicality which stresses uniformity and homogeneity, producing an invisible accent that replaces existing ‹foreign’ (i.e. authentic, biographic) accents. It is a new form of commodified dialectology, which differs quite substantially from common state and academic attitudes towards dialects and accents. The procedures used by such private providers are instances of language policing aimed at the infinitely small stuff of language: pronunciation. They show the interplay of different institutional actors in producing language norms within a globalized environment, and they raise issues of subjectivity and agency.

Keywords

Internet Accent American Globalization Language policing 

References

  1. Agha, A. (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15, 38–59. doi:10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barthes, R. (1957). Mythologies. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  5. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(2), 115–130. doi:10.2167/md089.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. de Swaan, A. (2001). Words of the world. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Elmes, S. (2005). Talking for Britain: A journey through the nation’s dialects. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  11. Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (2006). The hermeneutics of the subject. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  14. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Graddol, D. (2006). English next: Why global English may mean the end of ‹english as a foreign language. London: British Council.Google Scholar
  16. Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Phillipson, R. (2003). English-only Europe? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Silverstein, M. (1996). Monoglot ‹standard’ in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In D. Brenneis & R. Macaulay (Eds.), The matrix of language (pp. 286–306). Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  20. Silverstein, M. (2003a). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23, 193–229. doi:10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Silverstein, M. (2003b). Talking politics: The substance of style from Abe to ‹W’. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  22. Silverstein, M. (2006). Old wine, new ethnographic lexicography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 481–496. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams, E. (2006). Bridges and barriers: Languages in African education and development. Manchester: StJerome.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JyväskyläTilburg UniversityBerchemBelgium

Personalised recommendations