Language Policy

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 261–284 | Cite as

Language policy in the making: an analysis of bilingual gaming activities

Original Paper

Abstract

Building on an understanding of language policy as continually evolving, emergent and influenced by norms of specific communities and cultures, this paper investigates the practices through which young people negotiate informal language policies when interacting with new media in the context of electronic gaming. We examine how young new media users participating in gaming activities construct norms of bilingual language use. Gaming is a new media setting where the resources of more than one language are deployed to create local meanings and negotiate situated identities. Gamers and fans as social agents appropriate contextually available linguistic resources and thus actively and sensitively negotiate the norms and policies relevant to them. We argue that future discussion of the impact of new media on language use should be informed by detailed analysis of the micro-management and policing of norms, practices and repertoires in specific contexts of media use.

Keywords

Emergent language policies Fan fiction Game-playing Gaming activities New media Normativity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, J. (2003). Non-native English and sub-cultural identities in media discourse. In H. Sandøy (Ed.), Den fleirspråklege utfordinga/The multilingual challenge (pp. 83–98). Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
  2. Androutsopoulos, J. (Ed.). (2006). Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Thematic issue. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(4).Google Scholar
  3. Androutsopoulos, J., & Scholz, A. (2002). On the recontextualization of hip-hop in European speech communities. PhiN, 19, 1–42.Google Scholar
  4. Auer, P. (1999). From codeswitching via language mixing to fused lects: Toward a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3, 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  6. Black, R. W. (2006). Language, culture, and identity in online fanfiction. E-learning, 3(2), 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blommaert, J. (1999). The debate is open. In J. Blommaert (Ed.), Language ideological debates (pp. 1–38). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  8. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bucholtz, M. (2002). Play, identity and linguistic representation in the performance of accent. In K. Henning, N. Netherton, & L. C. Peterson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium about Language and Society, (pp. 227–251). Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  10. Buckingham, D. (2006). Studying computer games. In D. Carr, et al. (Eds.), Computer games: Text, narrative and play (pp. 1–13). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burn, A., & Schott, G. (2004). Heavy hero or digital dummy? Multimodal player-avatar relations in Final Fantasy 7. Visual Communication, 3(2), 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carr, D., Buckingham, D., Burn, A., & Schott, G. (2006). Computer games: Text, narrative and play. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clerc, S. (2000). Estrogen brigades and “big tits” threads’. In D. D. Bell & B. M. Kennedy (Eds.), The Cybercultures reader (pp. 73–97). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 366–405). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cromdal, J. (2005). Bilingual order in collaborative word processing: On creating an English text in Swedish. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cromdal, J., & Aronsson, K. (2000). Footing in bilingual play. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4, 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Danet, B., & Herring, S. C. (Eds.). (2007). The multilingual internet: Language, culture, and communication online. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ermi, L., Heliö, S., & Mäyrä, F. (2004). Pelien voima ja pelaamisen hallinta: lapset ja nuoret pelikulttuurien toimijoina [The power of games and the control over playing: Children and adolescents as actors in game cultures] Hypermedialaboratorion verkkojulkaisuja 6. Hypermedialaboratorio, University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave and MacMillan.Google Scholar
  21. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within␣situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Context, activity and participation. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 77–99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  24. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hutcheon, L. (2000). A theory of Parody: The teachings of twentieth-century art forms. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  26. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans & participatory culture. Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Jenkins, H. (1998). The poachers and stormtroopers. Red Rock Eater Digest. Accessed August 12, 2003 from http://commons.somewhere.com/rre/1998/The.Poachers.and.theSto.html.
  28. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2000). Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  31. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Leppänen, S. (2007a). Youth language in media contexts: Some insights into the functions of English in Finland. World Englishes, 26, 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leppänen, S. (2007b). Cybergirls in trouble: Fan fiction as a discursive space for interrogating gender and sexuality. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & R. Iedema (Eds.), Identity in trouble: Critical discourse and contested identities (pp. 156–179). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Leppänen, S. (2008). Kielten valinta, vaihtelu ja sekoittaminen faniuden rakennusaineisna verkkofiktiossa [Language choice, alternation and mixing in the constuction of fandom in web fiction]. In S. Leppänen, T. Nikula, & L. Kääntä (Eds.), Kolmas kotimainen. Lähikuvia englannin käytöstä Suomessa [The third domestic language: Close encounters with English in Finland] (pp. 204–235). Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
  35. Leppänen, S. (2009). Playing with and policing language use and textuality in fan fiction. In H.-D. Ingrid, A. Kirchhofer, & S. Leppänen (Eds.), Internet fictions. (pp. 71–89) Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pennycook, A. (2006). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2008). Koodinvaihto kontekstivihjeenä videopelitilanteessa [Code-switching as a contextualization cue in game-playing settings]. In S. Leppänen, T. Nikula, & L. Kääntä (Eds.), Kolmas kotimainen. Lähikuvia englannin käytöstä Suomessa [The third domestic language: Close encounters with English in Finland] (pp. 136–168). Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
  38. Piirainen-Marsh, A., & Tainio, L. (2009). Other-repetition as a resource for participation in the activity of playing a video game. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 153–169.Google Scholar
  39. Piirainen-Marsh, A., & Tainio, L. (in press). Collaborative game-play as a site for participation and situated learning of second language. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 6.Google Scholar
  40. Pullen, K. (2000). I-love-Xena.com: Creating online fan communities. In D. Gauntlett (Ed.), Web studies: Rewiring media studies for the digital age (pp. 52–61). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  41. Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  42. Rampton, B. (2006). Language in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Raudaskoski, P. (2003). TV-reception som en ressource for udvikling af tv-programmer og nye medier [TV-reception as a resource for developing tv-programmes and new media]. In B. Asmuß & J.␣Steensig (Eds.), Samtalen på arbejde.Konversationsanalyse og kompetenceudvikling [Conversation at work.␣Conversation analysis and competence development.] (pp. 309–330). Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  44. Ricento, T. (Ed.). (2000). Ideology, politics and language policies. Focus on English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  45. Ricento, T. (Ed.). (2006a). An introduction to language policy: Theories and method. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Ricento, T. (2006b). Language policy: Theory and practice—An introduction. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theories and method (pp. 10–23). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Salokoski, T. (2005) Tietokonepelit ja niiden pelaaminen [Computer games and game-playing]. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, Vol. 277. University of Jyväskylä Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schiffman, H. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Schiffman, H. (2006). Language policy and linguistic culture. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theories and method (pp. 111–126). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Storey, J. (1996). Cultural studies and the study of popular culture. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  52. Suoninen, A. (2002). Lasten pelikulttuuri [Children’s game culture]. In E. Huhtamo & S. Kangas (Eds.), Mariosofia. Elektronisten pelien kulttuuri [Mariosofia. The culture of electronic games] (pp. 95–130). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
  53. Szczepek, B. (2001). Prosodic orientation in Spoken interaction. InLiSt 27. Accessed February, 2008 from http://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/inlist/issues/27/index.htm.
  54. Thorne, S. L. (2008). Mediating technologies and second language learning. In D. Leu, J. Coiro, C.␣Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 417–449). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Woolard, K. (1999). Simultaneity and bivalency as strategies in bilingualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 8, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LanguagesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations