Language Policy

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 5–25 | Cite as

Linguistic globalization and the call center industry: Imperialism, hegemony or cosmopolitanism?

Original Paper


Linguistic imperialism, linguistic hegemony and linguistic cosmopolitanism are broad and contrasting conceptualizations of linguistic globalization that are frequently, if implicitly, invoked in the literature, both academic and non-academic, on language practices and perceptions in the call center industry. I begin with outlining each of these three conceptual frameworks and show how they inform analyses of the dynamics and relations between Indian call center agents and their American customers. I then switch the focus to the Canadian call center industry, which is both a near-shore site for American customers and offshores voice services to India. By examining the Canadian industry in terms of the three conceptual frameworks, we can begin to discern contrasts and similarities in global language practices and perceptions, leading to a refinement of our understanding of linguistic globalization. I conclude by recommending, from a social science research perspective, a linguistic hegemony framework for its rich analysis.


Call centers Canada Cosmopolitanism English Globalization Imperialism India Hegemony Language 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agarwal, K. S. (1993). English, Laloo: A Bihari story. The Independent (Bombay), September 23.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. (2004). The Indian machine. Wired 12.02. Accessed 28 September 2004.
  4. Annamalai, E. (2004). Nativization of English in India and its effect on multilingualism. Journal of Language and Politics, 3(1), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Appiah, A. (1994). Identity, authenticity, survival: Multicultural societies and social reproduction. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism (pp. 149–163). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Archibugi, D. (2005). The language of democracy: Vernacular or Esperanto? A comparison between the multiculturalist and cosmopolitan perspectives. Political Studies, 53, 537–555.Google Scholar
  7. Austen, I. (2004). Canada, the closer country for outsourcing work. The New York Times (November 30), W1, W7.Google Scholar
  8. Bocock, R. (1986). Hegemony. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood, Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Boo, K. (2004). The best job in town: The Americanization of Chennai. New Yorker (July 5), pp. 54–69.Google Scholar
  10. Bourne, A. (producer). (2004). Out of India. 60 Minutes, CBS (January 11).Google Scholar
  11. Bowen G. N. (2005). Nearshore? Farshore? Which shore for CRM? (March). Accessed 29 October 2007.
  12. Boyd, H. C., & Helms, J. E. (2005). Consumer entitlement theory and measurement. Psychology & Marketing, 22(3), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burgess, J., & Connell, J. (2006). Developments in the call centre sector: An overview. In J. Burgess & J. Connell (Eds.), Developments in the call centre industry (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Call Centre Sector Profile. (2004). Economic Development Office, Hamilton, ON. Accessed 30 December 2007.
  15. Cameron, D. (2000a). Good to talk?. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Cameron, D. (2000b). Styling the worker: Gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(3), 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Canadian Customer Contact Centre Industry (CCCCI). (2002, October). The Canadian Customer Contact Centre Landscape: An industry in transition—final report. Accessed 14 December 2007.
  18. Chatterjee, P. (1986). Nationalist thought and the colonial world. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  19. Chatterjee, P. (1994). Was there a hegemonic project of the colonial state? In D. Engels & S. Marks (Eds.), Contesting colonial hegemony (pp. 79–84). London: British Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chet, C. L. (2004). Like exporting baseball: Individualism and global competition in the high-tech industry. Anthropology of Work Review, 8(3–4), 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chirot, D., & Hall, T. D. (1982). World-system theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clayton, T. (1999). Decentering language in world-system inquiry. Language Problems & Language Planning, 23(2), 133–156.Google Scholar
  23. Clayton, T. (2005). Essay review: On globalization, hegemony and resistance in Selma K. Sonntag’s The local politics of global English: Case studies in linguistic globalization. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 3(1), 127–135.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, E. S. (2001). The politics of globalization in the United States. Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. Cowie, C. (2007). The accents of outsourcing: The meanings of “neutral” in the Indian call centre industry. World Englishes, 26(3), 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Datamonitor (2004). Call centers in Canada: Industry profile, Reference code 0070-0758. Accessed 28 January 2008.
  27. Deery, S., & Kinnie, N. (2004). Introduction: The nature and management of call centre work. In S. Deery & N. Kinnie (Eds.), Call centres and human resource management (pp. 1–22). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Dicken, P. (2003). Global shift. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Dua, H. R. (1994). Hegemony of English. Mysore: Yashoda Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Economist (2005). Tecnovate eSolutions: The call of the East (February 19), p. 61.Google Scholar
  31. Featherstone, M. (1995). Undoing culture. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Friedman, T. L. reporter (2004). The other side of outsourcing. Discovery Channel (June 3).Google Scholar
  33. Galtung, J. (1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8(2). (Reprinted in Peace and world structure, vol. 4, pp. 437–381, by J. Galtung, 1980, Copenhagen: Ejlers).Google Scholar
  34. Guha, R. (1997). Dominance without hegemony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hamm, B., & Smandych, R. (Eds.). (2005). Cultural imperialism. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hannerz, U. (1990). Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture. In M. Featherstone (Ed.), Global culture (pp. 237–251). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. House, J. (2003). English as a lingua franca: A threat to multilingualism? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 556–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hurst, L. (2007). Toronto: Lost in translation in the city of Babel. The Toronto Star (December 8). Accessed 12 December 2007.
  40. Ives, P. (2004). Gramsci’s politics of language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ives, P. (2006). “Global English”: Linguistic imperialism or practical lingua franca? Studies in Language and Capitalism, 1, 121–141.Google Scholar
  42. Ives, P. (forthcoming). Cosmopolitanism & global English: The missing language politics in globalisation debates (under review in Political Studies).Google Scholar
  43. Kachru, B. B. (1983). The Indianization of English. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kachru, B. B., & Smith L. (Eds.). (1982–2004). World Englishes. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. King, W. R. (2005). Outsourcing becomes more complex. Information Systems Management [], 22(2), 89–90.Google Scholar
  46. Kymlicka, W. (2003). Being Canadian. Government & Opposition, 38(3), 357–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. LaDousa, C. (2006). The discursive malleability of an identity: A dialogic approach to language “medium” schooling in north India. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 16(1), 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Legrain, P. (2003). Cultural globalization is not Americanization. Chronicle of Higher Education (May 9), pp. B7–B10.Google Scholar
  49. Mattelart, A. (1979). Multinational corporations and the control of culture (M. Chanan, Trans.). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  50. McPhate, M. (2005). Outsourcing outrage: Indian call-center workers suffer abuse. San Francisco Chronicle (November 17), p. C-1.Google Scholar
  51. Mirchandani, K. (2004a). Practices of global capital: Gaps, cracks and ironies in transnational call centres in India. Global Networks, 4(4), 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mirchandani, K. (2004b). Webs of resistance in transnational call centres: Strategic agents, service providers and customers. In R. Thomas, A. J. Mills, & J. H. Mills (Eds.), Identity politics at work (pp. 179–195). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Nederveen Pieterse, J. (2004). Globalization & culture. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Pal, A. (2004). Indian by day, American by night. Progressive (August), pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
  55. Perkins, T. (2005). Call-centres on a roll; jobs up more than fivefold from 1987: Statscan study. Toronto Sun (June 1), p. C10.Google Scholar
  56. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Poster, W. R. (2007). Who’s on the line? Indian call center agents pose as Americans for U.S.-outsourced firms. Industrial Relations, 46(2), 271–304.Google Scholar
  58. Ramanathan, V. (2005). The English-vernacular divide. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
  59. Reinhart, A. (2007). Canada: A nation of newcomers. The Globe and Mail (December 5). Accessed 12 December 2007.
  60. Rohde, D. (2004). Young workers are changing India’s politics and society. New York Times (August 21), p. A3.Google Scholar
  61. Roseman, E. (2007). Readers are still singing Bell blues. Toronto Star (April 14), Business section, p. D3.Google Scholar
  62. Roy, S. (2003). Bilingualism and standardization in a Canadian call center: Challenges for a linguistic minority community. In S. R. Schecter & R. Bayley (Eds.), Language socialization in bilingual and multilingual societies (pp. 269–285). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
  63. Schiller, H. I. (1976). Communication and cultural domination. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  64. Seidlhofer, B., & Jenkins, J. (2003). English as a lingua franca and the politics of property. In C. Mair (Ed.), The politics of English as a world language (pp. 139–154). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  65. Sheth, D. L. (1990). No English please, we’re Indian. Illustrated Weekly of India (August 19), pp. 34–37.Google Scholar
  66. Skipper, W. (2006). Services offshoring: An overview. Anthropology of Work Review, 27(2), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sonntag, S. K. (2003). The local politics of global English. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  68. Sonntag, S. K. (2005). Appropriating identity or cultivating capital? Global English in offshoring service industries. Anthropology of Work Review, 26(6), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sonntag, S. K. (2009). The changing global-local linguistic landscape in India. In L. Farrell, U. N. Singh, & R. A. Giri (Eds.), English language education in South Asia (pp. 29–39). India: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Srivastava, S., & Theodore, N. (2006). Offshoring call centres: The view from Wall Street. In J. Burgess & J. Connell (Eds.), Developments in the call centre industry (pp. 19–35). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Steger, M. B. (2003). Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  73. Taylor, P. (2000). Izations of the world: Americanization, modernization and globalization. In C. Hay & D. Marsh (Eds.), Demystifying globalization (pp. 49–70). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  74. Taylor, P., & Bain, P. (2005). ‘India calling to the far away towns’: The call centre labour process and globalization. Work Employment & Society, 19(2), 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Taylor, P., & Bain, P. (2006). Work organization and employee relations in Indian call centres. In J. Burgess & J. Connell (Eds.), Developments in the call centre industry (pp. 36–57). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. Thrift, N. (2000). State sovereignty, globalization and the rise of soft capitalism. In C. Hay & D. Marsh (Eds.), Demystifying globalization (pp. 71–102). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  77. Tomlinson, J. (1991). Cultural imperialism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  79. Vaish, V. (2008). Biliteracy and globalization. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
  80. Waldron, J. (1995). Minority cultures and the cosmopolitan alternative. In W. Kymlicka (Ed.), The rights of minority cultures (pp. 93–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Yelaja, P. (2007). Trade deal with India ‘a natural’ for Canada; Agreement will provide great potential to open markets, Emerson says. Toronto Star (June 18), Business section, p. B1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Government and PoliticsHumboldt State UniversityArcataUSA

Personalised recommendations