Gödelizing the Yablo Sequence
- 833 Downloads
We investigate what happens when ‘truth’ is replaced with ‘provability’ in Yablo’s paradox. By diagonalization, appropriate sequences of sentences can be constructed. Such sequences contain no sentence decided by the background consistent and sufficiently strong arithmetical theory. If the provability predicate satisfies the derivability conditions, each such sentence is provably equivalent to the consistency statement and to the Gödel sentence. Thus each two such sentences are provably equivalent to each other. The same holds for the arithmetization of the existential Yablo paradox. We also look at a formulation which employs Rosser’s provability predicate.
KeywordsIncompleteness Omega-liar Yablo’s paradox Paradox Provability Arithmetic Goedel
- 3.Hájek, P., & Pudlák, P. (1998). Metamathematics of first-order arithmetic. Springer.Google Scholar
- 5.Leitgeb, H. (2002). What is a self-referential sentence? Critical remarks on the alleged (non-)circularity of Yablo’s paradox. Logique & Analyse, 177–178, 3–14.Google Scholar
- 7.Smith, P. (2007). An introduction to Gödel’s theorem’s. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 9.Urbaniak, R. (2009). Leitgeb, “about”, Yablo. Logique & Analyse, 207, 239–254.Google Scholar