Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 353–385 | Cite as


  • Joop Leo


In the ordinary way of representing relations, the order of the relata plays a structural role, but in the states themselves such an order often does not seem to be intrinsically present. An alternative way to represent relations makes use of positions for the arguments. This is no problem for the love relation, but for relations like the adjacency relation and cyclic relations, different assignments of objects to the positions can give exactly the same states. This is a puzzling situation. The question is what is the internal structure of relations? Is the use of positions still justified, and if so, what is their ontological status? In this paper mathematical models for relations are developed that provide more insight into the structure of relations “out there” in the real world.

Key words

argument-places mathematical models metaphysics relations states of affairs substitution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fine, K.: The Problem of De Re Modality, in J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989, pp. 197–272.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fine, K.: Neutral relations, The Philosophical Review 109 (2000), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leo, J.: Modeling Relations, Logic Group Preprint Series 244, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lowe, J.: Vague identity and quantum indeterminacy, Analysis 54 (1994), 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Williamson, T.: Converse relations, The Philosophical Review 94 (1985), 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations