TRUTH AS AN EPISTEMIC IDEAL
Several philosophers—including C. S. Peirce, William James, Hilary Putnam and Crispin Wright—have proposed various versions of the notion that truth is an epistemic ideal. More specifically, they have held that a proposition is true if and only if it can be fixedly warranted by human inquirers, given certain ideal epistemic conditions. This paper offers a general critique of that idea, modeling conceptions of ideality and fixed warrant within the semantics that Kripke developed for intuitionistic logic. It is shown that each of the two plausible notions of fixed warrant faces difficulties and that, moreover, “truth” defined in terms of either of them is distressingly dependent upon one’s conception of idealized inquiry and perhaps also upon one’s standards of warrant.
Key wordsinquiry Kripke semantics Peirce, C.S. superassertibility truth warrant Wright, Crispin
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alston, W. P.: 1996, A Realist Conception of Truth, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
- James, W.: 1909, The Meaning of Truth, Longmans, Green & Co., London.Google Scholar
- Kripke, S.: 1963, Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic I, in J. Crossley and M. Dummett (eds.), Formal Systems and Recursive Functions, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 92–129.Google Scholar
- Misak, C. J.: 2004, Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth (expanded paperback edition), Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Nolt, J.: 2006, Free logics, in D. Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic, (Volume 5 of the Handbook of the Philosophy of Science under the general editorship of Dov Gabbay, Paul Thagard, and John Woods), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 793–830.Google Scholar
- Peirce, C. S.: 1931–1958, in C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss and A. W. Burks (eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–8, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Putnam, H.: 1981, Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Van Dalen, D.: 1983, Intuitionistic logic, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenther (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume III: Alternatives to Classical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 225–339.Google Scholar
- Wright, C.: 1992, Truth and Objectivity, Harvard, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Wright, C.: 2003, Saving the Differences: Essays on Themes from Truth and Objectivity, Harvard, Cambridge.Google Scholar