Relevant Restricted Quantification
- First Online:
The paper reviews a number of approaches for handling restricted quantification in relevant logic, and proposes a novel one. This proceeds by introducing a novel kind of enthymematic conditional.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Beall, JC. (2004): Curry's Paradox, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2004 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2004/entries/curry-paradox/.
- Belnap, N. D. (1973): Restricted quantification and conditional assertion, Ch. 2, in H. Leblanc (ed.), Truth, Syntax and Modality, North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Brady, R. T. (2003): Relevant Logic and their Rivals, Vol. II, Ashgate, Aldershot.Google Scholar
- Cohen, D. (1992): Relevant implication and conditional assertion, in A. Anderson, N. D. Belnap and J. M. Dunn (eds.), Entailment, Vol. II, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp. 472–487.Google Scholar
- Priest, G. (1987): In Contradiction, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
- Priest, G. (2001): Introduction to Non-Classical Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Restall, G. (2000): Introduction to Substructural Logics, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Sylvan, R. and Nola, R. (1991): Confirmation without paradoxes, in G. Schurz and G. Dorn (eds.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy, Rodophi, Amsterdam, pp. 5–44; reprinted as ch. 10 of D. Hyde and G. Priest (eds.), Sociative Logics and their Applications: Essays by the Late Richard Sylvan, Ashgate, Aldershot (2000).Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006