Advertisement

Liverpool Law Review

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 271–297 | Cite as

The Jurisprudence of Taxpayer Rights in India: An Evolutionary Tale in Direct Taxation

  • Kinshuk JhaEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article traces the evolution of taxpayer rights in direct taxes in India. From the first income tax statute introduced in British India to the most recent one, a broad analysis has been done of the enactments to comprehend the jurisprudence of taxpayer rights in India. The role of different administrative committees and the courts of law in establishing taxpayer rights has also been analysed. The scope of taxpayer rights in post-independence India has been probed, the colonial and post-colonial travails of the taxpayer have been outlined, and the contemporary redressals to taxpayer concerns up to the period of September 2019 have been examined in this article.

Keywords

History of taxation Direct taxes Income tax law Taxpayer rights Tax administration Tax reforms Tax certainity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am thankful to International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, Amsterdam for the research stay during the summer of 2017. It provided me with valuable insights which have been helpful in the development of this paper. I thank Luca Cerioni for his generous guidance. I also thank Prabhakar Singh and Arpita Gupta for the sustained conversations and thoughtful comments.

References

  1. Alvaredo, Facundo, Augustin Bergeron, and Guilhem Cassan, Income concentration in British India, 18851946. Online Appendix. http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/AlvaredoBergeronCassan2017Appendix.pdf.
  2. Bagehot, Walter. 1968. Collected Works. London: The Economist 3: 352–353.Google Scholar
  3. Bentley, Duncan. 2016. Taxpayer Rights: Coping With Globalization and Uncertainty. Tax Notes International. Special Reports: 192.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, Abram. 2019. The Tragedy Behind The Death of Former Billionaire V.G. Siddhartha, India’s Coffee King. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2019/07/31/vg-siddhartha-death-coffee-day/#1396593f4f7b.
  5. Business Line. 2019. Task force on direct tax code submits report to FM Nirmala Sitharaman. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/task-force-on-direct-tax-code-submits-report-to-nirmala-sitharaman/article29146603.ece.
  6. Choudhary, Shrimi. 2019. CBDT Initiates Probe into Cafe Coffee Day founder V G Siddhartha’s death. Business Standardhttps://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/vg-siddhartha-s-death-cbdt-starts-inquiry-in-cafe-coffee-day-case-119081401620_1.html.
  7. de Zeeuw, Maarten. 2008. The Formulation of Taxpayer Rights and Obligations in a Developing Country. Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin 14: 40.Google Scholar
  8. Deloitte. 2018. Tax Insights, Corporate residency testATO’s new Approach Increases Risk for foreign Companies to be Treated as Australian Tax Residentshttps://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/au/Documents/tax/deloitte-au-tax-insight-corporate-residency-test-ato-new-approach-210618.pdf
  9. Dhruva Associates. 2018. Tax dispute resolution in India trends and insights. https://dhruvaadvisors.com/insights/files/TaxDisputesResolutionIndia_v2.pdf.
  10. Dhume, Sadanand. 2019. India Should Quit Harassing the ‘Super-Rich’: Boosting Taxes on High Earners Won’t Bring in the Revenue Modi Needs. It will Drive Out the Wealthy. The Wall Street Journal (22 Aug 2019).Google Scholar
  11. Garner, Bryan, and Henry Campbell Black. 2009. Black’s Law, 9th ed. Minnesota: West Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Gulati, I.S. 1972. Wanchoo Report: A Critique. Economic and Political Weekly 28 (7): 1314–1317.Google Scholar
  13. Hibbert, Christopher. 1978. The Great Mutiny. London: Viking.Google Scholar
  14. Jain, Parul, and K. Sekar. 2015. Country Report: India, 445–467. Rotterdam: International Fiscal Association Publication, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  15. Jaiswal, Suraj, and Neeti Biyani. 2016. India’s Experience with Exchange of Information Agreements. http://www.cbgaindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Indias-Experience-with-Exchange-of-Information-Agreements-Web-Publication.pdf.
  16. Jenkins, C.L. 2012. Legislative Comment 1860: India’s First Income tax. British Tax Review 7: 87–116.Google Scholar
  17. Krishnamurthy, Vijay. 2013. India’s GAAR: Nice Idea, Shame About the Execution. ITR. https://www.internationaltaxreview.com/article/b1fbsrj45h1rr6/indias-gaar-nice-idea-shame-about-the-execution.
  18. Modani, Kshama Loya, Ashish Kabra, and Mohammad Kamran. 2019. In Line with Vodafone, Delhi High Court Refuses Another Anti-BIT Arbitration Injunction. New Delhi: Nisith Desai Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Moore, R.J. 1966. Sir Charles Wood’s Indian Policy, 1853–66. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Orford, A. 2012. In Praise of Description. Leiden Journal of International Law 25: 609–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. PTI. 2019b. Cairn Energy Ready to Reinvest in India if Retro Tax Issue is Resolved. Livemint. https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/cairn-energy-ready-to-reinvest-in-india-if-retro-tax-issue-is-resolved-ceo-1564898649921.html.
  22. Ranjan, Prabhash, and Pushkar Anand. 2018. Vodafone Versus India—BIT by BIT, International Arbitration Becomes Clearer. The Wire. https://thewire.in/business/vodafone-versus-india-bit-international-arbitration.
  23. Rao, MG. 2016. Raja Chelliah: The Father of Tax Reform. Financial Express. https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/raja-chelliah-the-father-of-tax-reform/335558/.
  24. Rao, V.K.R.V. 1931. Taxation of Income in India. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenbloom, H.D. 1983. Tax Treaty Abuse: Problems and Issues. Law and Policy in International Business 15: 763.Google Scholar
  26. Roy, T. 2015. The East India Company: the World’s Most Powerful Corporation. Gurgan: Penguin.Google Scholar
  27. Salve, Harish. 2015. Retrospective Taxationthe Indian Experience. British Institute of International and Comparative Law. https://www.biicl.org/files/6722_panel_two_harish_salve.pdf.
  28. Savla, PS, and Keerthiga Sharma. 2017. Budget 2017: Is it Time to Mediate with the Revenue? https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/personal-finance/budget-2017-is-it-time-to-mediatethe-revenue-944492.html.
  29. Shrimi, Choudhary. 2019. CBDT Initiates probe into Cafe Coffee Day Founder V G Siddhartha’s Death. Business Standard. August 15, 2019. https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/vg-siddhartha-s-death-cbdt-starts-inquiry-in-cafe-coffee-day-case-119081401620_1.html.
  30. Singh, P. 2019. Spinning Yarns From Moonbeams: A Jurisprudence of Statutory Interpretation in Common Law. Statute Law Review.  https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmy035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh, RR, and Neetika Kaushal Nagpal. 2014. Navigating the Headwinds: Mitigating Contention in India-US Business Engagement. http://icrier.org/ICRIER_Wadhwani/Index_files/India’s_Investment_Climate.pdf.
  32. Srivats, KR. 2017. Uncertainty Continues Over Retrospective Taxation. Business Line. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/policy/uncertainty-continues-over-retrospective-taxation/article9657224.ece.
  33. Sultana, Nasrin. 2019. Relief for Markets as Super-Rich Surcharge on FPIs is Withdrawn. Livemint. https://www.livemint.com/politics/policy/surcharge-withdrawal-for-fpis-big-positive-for-markets-1566573215377.html.
  34. Johndon, T.A. 2019. Coffee and froth: For VG Siddhartha, a lot could happen over coffee. The Indian Express.Google Scholar
  35. Zuchermann, Gabriel. 2015. The Hidden Wealth of Nations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kanga, J.B., and N.A. Palkhivala. 2004. Law and Practice of Income Tax, 9th ed. New Delhi: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
  37. Adam, Smith. 1999 [1776] Wealth of Nations. Skinner, Andrew (Intro). London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Cases

  1. Cape Brandy Syndicate v. IRC. 1921. KB 64.Google Scholar
  2. Heydon’s Case. (1584) 3 Co Rep 7a.Google Scholar
  3. Collector Of Central Excise vs Parle Exports. 1989. AIR [SC] 644.Google Scholar
  4. Columbia Sportswear Co. v. DIT. 2012. 11 SCC 224.Google Scholar
  5. Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. Dilip Kumar and Company. 2018. 9 SCC 40.Google Scholar
  6. Eilbeck (Inspector of Taxes) v. Rawling. 1982. A.C. 300.Google Scholar
  7. Govind Saran Ganga Saran vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax. 1985. AIR 1041, 1985 SCR (3) 985.Google Scholar
  8. Lohia Machines Ltd and Anr v UOI. 1985. 152 ITR 308.Google Scholar
  9. Jindal Stainless Ltd v. State of Haryana. 2016. Indlaw SC 979.Google Scholar
  10. K. P. Varghese V. ITO. 1981. 131 ITR 597.Google Scholar
  11. Krishna Murthi and Co v State of Madras. 1972. AIR 1972 SC 2455.Google Scholar
  12. Vodafone International Holdings B.V. v. Union of India. 2012. 1 S.C.R. 573.Google Scholar
  13. W. T. Ramsay Ltd. v. Inland Revenue Commissioners. [1982] A.C. 300.Google Scholar

Legislations

  1. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.Google Scholar
  2. Constitution of India, 1950.Google Scholar
  3. Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1926.Google Scholar
  4. Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1939.Google Scholar
  5. Income Tax Act, 1860.Google Scholar
  6. Income Tax Act, 1886.Google Scholar
  7. Income Tax Act, 1918.Google Scholar
  8. Income Tax Act, 1922.Google Scholar
  9. Income Tax Act, 1961.Google Scholar
  10. Indian Evidence Act, 1872.Google Scholar
  11. Punjab Laws Act, 1872.Google Scholar
  12. Right to Information Act, 2005.Google Scholar
  13. Wealth Tax Act, 1957.Google Scholar

Reports

  1. Advisors, B.M.R. 2013. Managing Tax Disputes in India: Key concepts and Practical Insights. New Delhi: Lexis Nexis.Google Scholar
  2. Duhigg, Charles & David Kocieniewsky. 2012. How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes. New York Times, 12 April.Google Scholar
  3. Govt. of India, Press Information Bureau. 2019. Ratification by India of the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=191125.
  4. Govt. of India. 2014. Status of TARC recommendations. https://dor.gov.in/sites/default/files/Status%20Of%20TARC%20Recommendations_0.pdf.
  5. Govt. of India. 1971. Direct Taxes Enquiry Committee: Final Report. http://www.thehinducentre.com/multimedia/archive/03091/direct-taxes-enqui_3091080a.pdf.
  6. Govt. of India. 2012. Central Board of Direct Taxes, 29th May, 2012, F. No. 500/1 1 1 12009-FTD-l). https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/Lists/Departmental%20News/Attachments/214/Departmental_News.pdf.
  7. Govt. of India. 2012. Expert Committee, Final Report on General Anti Avoidance Rules (GAAR) in Income-tax Act, 1961. https://www.finmin.nic.in/sites/default/files/report_gaar_itact1961.pdf.
  8. Govt. of India. 2012. Central Board of Direct Taxes, F. No. 500/1 1 1 12009-FTD-l (Pt.)..https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/Lists/Departmental%20News/Attachments/214/Departmental_News.pdf.
  9. Govt. of India. 2016. Department of Revenue, Settlement Commission (IT-WT). https://dor.gov.in/rti/settlement-commisssion-itwt.
  10. Govt. of India. 2017. The Citizens’ Charter: Indian Experience. https://darpg.gov.in/citizens-charters-historical-background.
  11. Income Tax Report. 2018. Task Force for drafting the new Income Tax Law, Report on Income Tax Reforms for building a new India. https://www.thehindu.com/news/resources/article29215092.ece/Binary/IncomeTaxReformsReport.pdf.
  12. Jha, Kinshuk. 2017. Taxpayer rights and obligations. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/taxpayer-rights-and-obligations/article19723024.ece.
  13. OECD. 2013. Action Plan on base Erosion and Profit shifting. https://www.oecd.org/ctp/BEPSActionPlan.pdf.
  14. Vaishnava, Saumya. 2014. First Report of the Tax Administration Reforms Commission. PRS.https://www.prsindia.org/sites/default/files/parliament_or_policy_pdfs/1404204462_TARC%20First%20Report%20Summary.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jindal Global Law SchoolSonipatIndia

Personalised recommendations