Advertisement

Levinas’s Contribution to the Law of Hospitality

  • Amanda LoumanskyEmail author
Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

This article examines the ethical thinking of Levinas, from which Derrida’s Law of Hospitality is derived, to see if it is sustainable in the face of Badiou’s claim that transcendence cannot be admitted into the body of philosophical thought. Is Levinas, as Badiou argues, seeking to smuggle religion into philosophy and if so does this attempt amount to no more than an anti-philosophy theology which has to be resisted for the integrity of philosophy? Dissenting from this view I return to Levinas and consider the problematisation with ethics which accompanies the arrival of the Third that, on the face of it supports Badiou’s claim he is engaged in a form of virtue signalling which is without relevance to the concerns of life. I then go on and refute Zizek’s claim that Levinas’s Other shares an origin (conceptually) with the Nazi Other. The article concludes by examining the contribution of transcendence. I consider that it does have a place in philosophy and that it is dogmatic and unnecessary to suggest otherwise. I suggest that transcendence allows us to look at the concept of the Good in a way that the thinking of materialists, such as Badiou never can. Levinas allows us to conceive of a conscience of the law that introduces justice and holds the law to account by challenging its claims to be acting justly. This connects our thinking on the subject to Western tradition which materialism would rupture in its pursuit of philosophical purity claiming as it does to be a defence of philosophical integrity.

Keywords

Levinas Badiou Law Particularism Transcendence 

Notes

References

  1. Badiou, A. 2001. Ethics, an essay on the understanding of Evil (trans. Peter Hallward). London, New York: BersoGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. 1993. Postmodern ethics. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Bowring, B. 2009. Global law and human rights: Marxist reflections: How can a political account of human rights avoid Eurocentrism? Paper given at Historical Materialism Annual Conference, 27–29 November 2009.Google Scholar
  4. Caygill, H. 2002. Levinas and the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Critchley, S. 2015. The problem with Levinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. 1997. Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas (trans Bault P. and Naas M.). USA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Douzinas, C., and R. Warrington. 1994. Justice miscarried, ethics and aesethetics in law. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  8. Escorihuela, A.L. 2003. Alf Ross: Towards a realist critique & reconstruction of international law. European Journal of International Law 14 (4): 703–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hand, S. (ed.). 1989. The Levinas reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Hutchens, B.C. 2004. Levinas a guide for the perplexed. London and New York: Continuuum Books.Google Scholar
  11. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1981. Otherwise than being, or beyond essence (trans. Lingis, A.) Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, reprint 2006.Google Scholar
  12. Rose, G. 1992. The broken middle, out of our ancient society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Ross, A. 1959. On law and justice. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Spaak, T. 2014. A critical appraisal of Karl Olivecrona’s legal philosophy. Law & Philosophy Library, vol. 108. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Stonks, M.C. 2012. The question of Salah Sheekh: Derrida’s hospitality and migration law. International Journal of Law in Context 8 (1): 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wright, T., and P. Hughes. 1988. The paradox of morality. In Contribution to The provocation of Levinas. Rethinking the other, ed. R. Bernasconi and D. Wood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Zizek, S. 2008. Violence, six sideways reflections. London: Big Ideas Series, Profile Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations