Liverpool Law Review

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 83–101 | Cite as

Monsters, Heroes, Martyrs and Their Storytellers: The Enduring Attraction of Culturally Embedded Narratives in the ‘War on Terror’

  • Lynsey Mitchell


This paper begins by exploring how traditional Manichean and binary narratives, which are familiar to us from fairy-tales, were used to justify the ‘War on Terror’ and then engages with the feminist and critical scholarship which argues that such narratives helped silence the wider geopolitical and legal discussions. Whilst this paper concurs with the large volume of literature that concludes that the heroic narrative obscures the political reality and marginalises the subjects of this narrative, it takes issue with some of the assumptions underlying this literature. This paper argues that many feminist scholars who critique the heroic narrative of the ‘War on Terror’ have fallen victim to the same oversimplification that the narrative itself deploys. While those scholars are correct to identify the operation of the heroic narrative within the rhetoric on the ‘War on Terror’, their continued focus solely on this narrative masks the more complex racialised and identity narratives that also operate within this rhetoric.


Afghanistan Feminism Fairy-tales Heroic narrative ‘War on Terror’ 


  1. Alford, M. 2011. Why not a propaganda model for Hollywood? In Screens of terror: Representations of war and terrorism in film and television since 9/11, ed. P. Hammond. Suffolk: Arima.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J.F. 2006. The rhetorical impact of evil on public policy. Administration & Society 37(6): 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anghie, A., and B.S. Chimni. 2003. Third world approaches to international law and individual responsibility in internal conflicts. Chinese Journal of International Law 2(1): 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayotte and Husain. 2005. Securing Afghan women: Neocolonialism, epistemic violence, and the rhetoric of the veil. NWSA Journal 17(3): 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair. 2001. Hansard HC, Vol. 372, col 814, 8th October 2001.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, P.L. 2001. Ideas and trends; heavy lifting required; the return of the manly men. New York Times. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  7. Buchanan, R., and R. Johnson. 2005. The unforgiven sources of international law: Nation-building, violence, and gender in the west (ern). In International law: Modern feminist approaches, eds. D. Buss, and A. Manji. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  8. Burns, J. 2001. A nation challenged: The wanted man. New York Times. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  9. Bush, G.W. 2001a. Acts of war statement, 12th September 2001. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  10. Bush, G.W. 2001b. Remarks by the President, Secretary of State Colin Powell and Attorney General John Ashcroft, 15th September 2001. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  11. Bush, G.W. 2001c. 19th September 2001.Google Scholar
  12. Bush, G.W. 2001d. Address to a joint session of Congress and the American people, 20th September 2001. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  13. Bush, G.W. 2001e. Presidential address to the nation, 7th October 2001. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  14. Bush, G.W. 2001f. State of the union address, 29th January 2002. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  15. Butler, J. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. Butler, J. 2009. Frames of war: When is life grievable. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Chandler, D. 2006. From Kosovo to Kabul and beyond: Human rights and international intervention. Ann Arbor: Pluto.Google Scholar
  18. Charlesworth, H., and C. Chinkin. 2002. Sex, gender, and September 11. The American Journal of International Law 96(3): 600–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cixous, H. 2002. The towers: Les tours. Signs 28(1): 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cloud, D.L. 2004. “To veil the threat of terror”: Afghan women and the <clash of civilizations> in the imagery of the US war on terrorism. Quarterly Journal of Speech 90(3): 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooke, M. 2002. Gender and September 11: A roundtable: Saving brown women. Signs 28(1): 468–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coughlin, C. 2006. American ally: Tony Blair and the war on terror. New York: Ecco Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cover, R.M. 1983. Foreword: Nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review 97: 4–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Devetak, R. 2005. The gothic scene of international relations: Ghosts, monsters, terror and the sublime after September 11. Review of International Studies 31(4): 621–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dowd, M. 2001. Liberties; hunks and brutes. New York Times. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  26. Enloe, C. 1990. Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Enloe, C. 2004. The curious feminist: Searching for women in a new age of empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fairclough, N.L. 2005. Blairs contribution to elaborating a new doctrine of international community. Journal of Language and Politics 4(1): 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Faludi, S. 2008. The terror dream: What 9/11 revealed about America. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Ferguson, M.L. 2005. “W” stands for women: Feminism and security rhetoric in the post-9/11 Bush administration. Politics & Gender 1(1): 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fluri, J.L. 2008. Rallying public opinion and other misuses of feminism. In Feminism and war: Confronting US imperialism, eds. R.L. Riley, C.T. Mohanty CT, and M.B. Pratt. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  32. Foucault, M. 1965. Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  33. Gallagher, N. 2004. Liberating Afghan women. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 21(3): 70–88.Google Scholar
  34. Goodstein, L. 2001. Fallwell: Blame abortionists, feminists and gays. The Guardian. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  35. Harnden, T. 2001. Bin Laden is wanted dead or alive says Bush. The Telegraph. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  36. Heathcote, G. 2005. Article 51 self-defense as a narrative: Spectators and heroes in international law. Texas Wesleyan Law Review 12: 131–153.Google Scholar
  37. House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee. 2002. Foreign policy aspects of the war against terrorism. HC 384.Google Scholar
  38. Holland, J. 2013. Selling the war on terror: Foreign policy discourses after 9/11. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Hoggett, P. 2005. Iraq: Blair’s mission impossible. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 7(3): 418–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hunt, K. 2002. The strategic co-optation of women’s rights. International Feminist Journal of Politics 4(1): 116–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hunt, K., and K. Rygiel. 2006. (En) gendering the war on terror: War stories and camouflaged politics. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Jackson, R. 2005. Writing the war on terrorism: Language, politics and counter-terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Jameson, F. 1996. The political unconscious: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Jeffords, S. 1994. Hard bodies: Hollywood masculinity in the Reagan era. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Jowett, G.S., and V. O’Donnell. 2011. Propaganda and persuasion. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Kapur, R. 2002. The tragedy of victimization rhetoric: Ressurecting the “native” subject in international/post-colonial feminist legal politics. Harvard Human Rights Journal 15: 1–37.Google Scholar
  47. Kearney, R. 2003. Terror, philosophy and the sublime: Some philosophical reflections on 11 September. Philosophy & Social Criticism 29(1): 23–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Khattak, S.G. 2002. Afghan women: Bombed to be liberated? Middle East Report 222: 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kolhatkar, S., and J. Ingalls. 2010. Bleeding Afghanistan: Washington, warlords, and the propaganda of silence. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lasswell, H.D. 1971. Propaganda technique in World War I. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lorber, J. 2002. Presidential address: Heroes, warriors, and burqas: A feminist sociologist’s reflections on September 11. Sociological Forum 17(3): 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McLaren, P. 2003. George Bush, apocalypse sometime soon, and the American imperium. 9-11 in American Culture 2: 147–152.Google Scholar
  53. Mead. 2010. 9/11, Manhood, Mourning and the American romance. In Reframing 9/11: Film, popular culture and the “war on terror”, eds. J. Birkenstein, A. Froula, and K. Randell. London: Continuum International.Google Scholar
  54. Mohanty, C.T. 1988. Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review 30: 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mutua, M. 2001. Savages, victims, and saviors: The metaphor of human rights. Harvard International Law Journal 42(1): 201–245.Google Scholar
  56. Noonan, P. 2001. Welcome back, duke: From the ashes of Sept. 11 arise the manly virtues. The Wall Street Journal. Accessed 18 Dec 2013.
  57. Orford, A. 1999. Muscular humanitarianism: Reading the narratives of the new interventionism. European Journal of International Law 10(4): 679–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Orford, A. 2003. Reading humanitarian intervention: Human rights and the use of force in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Philipose, E. 2008. Decolonizing the racial grammar of international law. In Feminism and war: Confronting US imperialism, eds. R.L. Riley, C.T. Mohanty, and M.B. Pratt. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  60. Porras, I.M. 1994. On terrorism: Reflections on violence and the outlaw. Utah Law Review 1994(1): 119–145.Google Scholar
  61. Rowe, K.E. 1979. Feminism and fairy tales. Women’s Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 6(3): 237–257.Google Scholar
  62. Puar, J.K., and A. Rai. 2002. Monster, terrorist, fag: The war on terrorism and the production of docile patriots. Social Text 20(3): 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saniotis, A. 2005. Re-enchanting terrorism: Jihadists as “liminal beings”. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 28(6): 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shepherd, L. 2006. Veiled references: Constructions of gender in the Bush administration discourse on the attacks on Afghanistan post-9/11. International Feminist Journal of Politics 8(1): 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Spivak, G.C. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, eds. C. Nelson, and L. Grossberg. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  66. Stabile, C.A., and D. Kumar. 2005. Unveiling imperialism: Media, gender and the war on Afghanistan. Media, Culture and Society 27(5): 765–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Takacs, S. 2010. The contemporary politics of the western form: Bush, saving Jessica Lynch and Deadwood. In Reframing 9/11: Film, popular culture and the “war on terror”, eds. J. Birkenstein, A. Froula, and K. Randell. London: Continuum International.Google Scholar
  68. The 9/11 Commission. 2004. The final report of the national commission on terrorist attacks upon the United States.
  69. Tickner, J. 2002. Feminist perspectives on 9/11. International Studies Perspectives 3(4): 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tolkien, J.R.R. ed. 1989. On fairy stories. In The Tolkien reader. London: Del Rey.Google Scholar
  71. UK Government Press Release. 2001. Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States, 11 September 2001. (accessed 11 November 2013).
  72. Wolfe, W.M. 2008. Winning the war of words: Selling the war on terror from Afghanistan to Iraq. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  73. Wright, S. 2002. The horizon of becoming: Culture, gender and history after September 1. Nordic Journal of International Law 71: 215–253.Google Scholar
  74. Zine, J. 2006. Between orientalism and fundamentalism: Muslim women and feminist engagement. In (En) Gendering the war on terror: War stories and camouflaged politics, eds. K. Hunt, and K. Rygiel. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  75. Zipes. 2006. Oxford encyclopaedia of children’s literature. New York: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of StrathclydeGlasgowScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations