Liverpool Law Review

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 197–208 | Cite as

Just War and Military Morale: A Brief Reflection on the Correlation Between the Legality of War and the Moral Repercussions for Members of US and UK Forces Arising from the Questionable Legality of the Campaign Iraqi Freedom of March 2003

Article
  • 182 Downloads

Abstract

Does it matter to a member of the military whether the military campaign in which he is taking part is lawful or not? Despite the observation that the crime of aggression (post Kampala 2010) constitutes a ‘leadership crime par excellence,’ which limits any (future) criminal responsibility accordingly, the legality or illegality of any military action under international law can create moral implications for the common foot soldier and mid-level officer and also have a tangible impact on the national legal frameworks under which these forces operate. This short article uses the example of Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) to discuss the repercussions of a—most likely—illegal military campaign for individual members of democratic armed forces before the background of the present discussion of NATO led action in Libya.

Keywords

Armed conflict Legality of the use of force Military morale Court martials Operation Iraqi freedom Crime of aggression 

References

  1. Ambos, K. 2010. The crime of aggression after Kampala. German Yearbook of International Law 53: 463–509.Google Scholar
  2. Bachmann, S., and G. Kemp. 2010. The international crime of aggression in the context of the global ‘war on terror’: Some legal and ethical perspectives. JSAL 2: 309–330.Google Scholar
  3. Brunnée, J., and S. Toope. 2004. Slouching towards new ‘just’ wars: international law and the use of force after September 11th’. Netherlands International Law Review 54: 363–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisler-Damrosch, L., and Oxman, B., eds. 2003. Future implications of the iraq conflict. The American Society of International Law.Google Scholar
  5. Fournet, C. 2006. International crimes: theories, practice and evolution. CMP Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Garraway, C. 1999. Superior orders and the international criminal court: Justice delivered or justice denied. International Review of the Red Cross 836: 785–794.Google Scholar
  7. Kemp, G. 2010. Individual criminal liability for the international crime of aggression, 207–237. Intersentia: Antwerp/Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Gray, C. 2004. International law and the use of force. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kelsen, H. 1947. Will the judgement in the nuremberg trial constitute a precedent in international law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 161.Google Scholar
  10. Kritsiotis, D. 2002. On the Jus ad bellum and Jus in bello of operation enduring freedom. ASIL Proceedings pp 35–41.Google Scholar
  11. Linnan, D. ed. 2008. Enemy combatants, terrorism, and armed conflict law: a guide to the issues. Westport: Praeger Security.Google Scholar
  12. McGoldrick, D. 2004. From ‘9–11’ to the Iraq War 2003. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Nolte and Krieger. 2002. Europäische Wehrrechtssysteme.Google Scholar
  14. Ratner, S., J. Bischoff, and J. Abrams. 2009. Accountability for human rights atrocities in international law-beyond the nuremberg legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ratner, S. 2002. Jus ad bellum and Jus in Bello after September 11’ in 96 AJIL 905–921.Google Scholar
  16. Schmitt, M. 2004. The legality of operation Iraqi freedom under international law. Journal of Military Ethics 3(2): 82–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. van Baarda, T. 2011. The ethical challenges of a complex security environment. In Ethics, law and military operations, ed. Whetham D. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. van der Vyver, J. 2003. Ius contra bellum and American foreign policy 28 SAYIL 1–28: 4.Google Scholar
  19. Wedgwood, R. 2003. The fall of Saddam Hussein: Security council mandates and preemptive self-defense. AJIL 97: 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations