Liverpool Law Review

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 49–63

Biopolitics and Movement: A History of Travellers and the Law



This article will briefly trace the travellers’ legal position in Britain from their sixteenth century emergence as a tangible (although imprecise) identity until now. It will be argued that although the position of the law has changed considerably in its waning severity, travellers’ legal status continues to be conditioned by enduring and shifting concerns around norms of labour and residence. Moreover, it is overly-simplistic to interpret their changing predicament as simply a more humane and multicultural relaxation of previously Draconian measures. Using Michel Foucault’s writings on discipline and ‘biopolitics’, it will be proposed that those extreme legal sanctions—which during certain periods included the death penalty—have been replaced by a much more nuanced matrix of regulation and control that seeks to assimilate traveller lifestyles into a mainstream understanding of human life and society.


Travellers Foucault Vagrancy acts Planning law Historical context 


  1. Allmendinger, Philip, and Mark Tewdwr-Jones. 2002. Planning futures: New directions for planning theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Beier, A.L. 1985. Masterless men. The vagrancy problem in England 1560–1640. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  3. Belton, Brian. 2005. Gypsy and traveller ethnicity: The social generation of an ethnic phenomenon. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, Philip, and Pat Niner. 2009. Assessing local authorities’ progress in meeting the accommodation needs of Gypsy and traveller communities in England. Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  5. Cahn, Claude, and Elspeth Guild. 2008. Recent migration of Roma in Europe. OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities.Google Scholar
  6. Cemlyn, Sarah, et al. 2009. Inequalities experienced by Gypsy and traveller communities: A review. Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  7. Charlesworth, Lorie. 1999. Why is it a crime to be poor? Liverpool Law Review 21(2): 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charlesworth, Lorie. 2006. Readings of begging: The legal response to begging considered in its moral and historical context. Nottingham Law Journal 15(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
  9. Clements, Luke, and Sue Campbell. 1997. The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act and its implications for travellers. In Gypsy politics and traveller identity, ed. Thomas Acton, 61–69. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, Michel. 1998. The will to knowledge: The history of sexuality volume one. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, Michel. 2002. Space, knowledge, and power. In Power: The essential works of Foucault 1954–1984. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, Michel. 2004. Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, Michel. 2009. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, Angus. 1992. The gypsies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Greenfields, Margaret. 2006. Stopping places. In Here to stay: The Gypsies and travellers of Britain, ed. Colin Clark, and Margaret Greenfields, 57–89. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
  17. Golder, Ben, and Peter Fitzpatrick. 2009. Foucault’s law. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hawes, Derek, and Barbara Perez. 1996. The gypsy and the state: The ethnic cleansing of British society, 2nd ed. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hunt, Alan, and Gary Wickham. 1994. Foucault and law. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, Tim, Marc Willers, and Angus Murdoch. 2007. Planning law. In Gypsy and traveller law, 2nd ed. Chris Johnson, and Marc Willers, 69–112. London: LAG.Google Scholar
  21. Mayall, David. 1998. Gypsy-travellers in nineteenth-century society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Niner, Pat. 2003. Local authority Gypsy/traveller sites in England. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
  23. Okely, Judith. 1983. The traveller-gypsies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ploger, John. 2008. Foucault’s dispositif and the city. Planning Theory 7(1): 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Radzinowicz, L., and R. Hood. 1990. The emergence of penal policy in Victorian and Edwardian England. Volume 5 of a history of criminal law and its administration from 1750. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  26. Ribton-Turner, C.J. 1887. A history of vagrants & vagrancy and beggars & begging. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Rickard, Gillian. 1995. Vagrants, gypsies and ‘travellers’ in Kent 1572–1948. Canterbury: Mickle Print.Google Scholar
  28. Sandland, Ralph. 2008. Developing a jurisprudence of difference: The protection of the human rights of travelling peoples by the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 8(3): 475–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simons, Jon. 1995. Foucault and the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Spencer, Sarah. 2005. Gypsies and travellers: Britain’s forgotten minority. European Human Rights Law Review 4: 335–343.Google Scholar
  31. Stephen, J.F. 1996. A history of the criminal law of England. Vol. 3. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Stewart, Michael. 1997. The puzzle of Roma persistence: Group identity without a nation. In Romani culture and gypsy identity: A companion volume to ‘Gypsy politics and traveller identity’, ed. Thomas Acton, and Gary Mundy, 84–98. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tyrnauer, Gabrielle. 1991. Gypsies and the Holocaust. Montreal: Concordia University Montreal Institute for Genocide Studies.Google Scholar
  34. Yiftachel, Oren. 1998. Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side. Journal of Planning Literature 12(4): 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Law, Governance and International RelationsLondon Metropolitan UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations