Advertisement

Structural Modification in Hepatitis C Virus Envelope Protein; Potential Viral Strategy Against Interferon Therapy

  • Iman Rad
  • Maryam HonardoostEmail author
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Interferons (IFNs) are the main part of the immune system as a defensive response to viral infection. The phosphorylation domain of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) E2 envelope glycoprotein is homologous to the host key enzymes in IFN-mediated response. So, if host kinases show no preference on E2 protein phosphorylation over IFN triggering factors, the IFN pathway would be competently inhibited. The aim of this study was to see if the resistance of HCV infected patients to IFN-therapy has something to do with HCV E2 envelope glycoprotein. For this purpose, the partially sequenced HCV E2 proteins obtained from 15 patients that were confirmed to be sustainable, semi-resistant (patients with relapsing infection) and resistant to IFN-therapy. The peptide sequences from 15 patients were analysed as a matter of homology, physicochemical properties and predicted structures using MEGA4 software, ProtParam, PSIPRED and I-TASSER tools, respectively. Then, certain point mutations introduced to sequences that acquired from patients resistant to IFN-therapy. Replacement of Asp 653 with Asn 653 in R1 at C-terminal of the E2 protein changes secondary and tertiary structures of downstream regions of E2 protein. Although the sequence of PKR-eIF2alpha phosphorylation homology domain in E2 protein remains intact during IFN therapy, its structure modifies in patients resistant to IFN-therapy, which then puts its phosphorylation potential in jeopardy. Therefore, structural modification in HCV E2 proteins, acquired form patients resistant to IFN-therapy, suggests a mechanism that shows how HCV gets resistant toward IFN-therapy.

Keywords

Interferon Hepatitis C virus (HCV) E2 envelope glycoprotein Interferon (IFN) therapy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of Interest.

References

  1. Afzal S et al (2010) Mutations in the E2-PePHD region of hepatitis C virus genotype-3a and correlation with response to interferon and ribavirin combination therapy in Pakistani patients. Virol J 7:377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagaglio S et al (2005) Mutations in the E2–PePHD region of hepatitis C virus type 1b in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Viral Hepatitis 12:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolcic F, Laufer N, Torres C, Cassino L, Reynoso R, Quarleri J (2012a) Longitudinal analysis of the 5′ UTR, E2-PePHD and NS5A-PKRBD genomic regions of hepatitis C virus genotype 1a in association with the response to peginterferon and ribavirin therapy in HIV-coinfected patients. Antiviral Res 95:72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolcic F, Sede M, Moretti F, Westergaard G, Vazquez M, Laufer N, Quarleri J (2012b) Analysis of the PKR-eIF2alpha phosphorylation homology domain (PePHD) of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in HIV-coinfected patients by ultra-deep pyrosequencing and its relationship to responses to pegylated interferon-ribavirin treatment. Arch Virol 157:703–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchan DW, Minneci F, Nugent TC, Bryson K, Jones DT (2013) Scalable web services for the PSIPRED protein analysis workbench. Nucleic Acids Res 41:W349–W357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Rueda PM et al (2008) Mutations in E2-PePHD, NS5A-PKRBD, NS5A-ISDR, and NS5A-V3 of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and their relationships to pegylated interferon-ribavirin treatment responses. J Virol 82:6644–6653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dey M, Cao C, Dar AC, Tamura T, Ozato K, Sicheri F, Dever TE (2005) Mechanistic link between PKR dimerization, autophosphorylation, and eIF2α. Substrate Recognit Cell 122:901–913Google Scholar
  8. Dey M et al (2011) Requirement for kinase-induced conformational change in eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) restricts phosphorylation of Ser51. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:4316–4321Google Scholar
  9. Garaigorta U, Chisari FV (2009) Hepatitis C virus blocks interferon effector function by inducing protein kinase R phosphorylation. Cell host Microbe 6:513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, Bairoch A (2005) Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In: The proteomics protocols handbook. Springer, New York pp 571–607Google Scholar
  11. Gaudy C, Lambelé M, Moreau A, Veillon P, Lunel F, Goudeau A (2005) Mutations within the hepatitis C virus genotype 1b E2-PePHD domain do not correlate with treatment outcome. J Clin Microbiol 43:750–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helbling B et al (2002) Interferon and amantadine in naive chronic hepatitis C: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology 35:447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Honardoost M, Sabahi F, Amini-Bavil-Olyaee S, Behzadian F, Merat S, Malekzadeh R (2008) Interferon resistance of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1a/1b: relationship to structural E2 gene quasispecies mutations Iranian. J Biotechnol 6:36–44Google Scholar
  14. Hung CH et al (2003) Mutations in the NS5A and E2-PePHD region of hepatitis C virus type 1b and correlation with the response to combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin. J Viral Hepatitis 10:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hung CH et al (2008) Association of amino acid variations in the NS5A and E2-PePHD region of hepatitis C virus 1b with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Viral Hepatitis 15:58–65Google Scholar
  16. Johansson MU, Zoete V, Michielin O, Guex N (2012) Defining and searching for structural motifs using DeepView/Swiss-PdbViewer. BMC Bioinform 13:173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kato N, Hijikata M, Ootsuyama Y, Nakagawa M, Ohkoshi S, Sugimura T, Shimotohno K (1990) Molecular cloning of the human hepatitis C virus genome from Japanese patients with non-A, non-B hepatitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9524–9528Google Scholar
  18. Kim E et al (2018) eIF2A, an initiator tRNA carrier refractory to eIF2α kinases, functions synergistically with eIF5B. Cell Mol Life Sci 75:4287–4300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mutz P et al (2018) HBV bypasses the innate immune response and does not protect HCV from antiviral activity of interferon. Gastroenterology 154:1791–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rahamathulla S et al (2018) Determination of sustained virological response in hepatitis C virus genotypes by the number of mutations in the E2 and NS5A-ISDR regions: a meta-analysis russian. J Genet 54:1013–1024Google Scholar
  21. Samimi-Rad K, Nategh R, Malekzadeh R, Norder H, Magnius L (2004) Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis C virus in Iran as reflected by phylogenetic analysis of the NS5B region. J Med Virol 74:246–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarrazin C, Bruckner M, Herrmann E, Rüster B, Bruch K, Roth WK, Zeuzem S (2001) Quasispecies heterogeneity of the carboxy-terminal part of the E2 gene including the PePHD and sensitivity of hepatitis C virus 1b isolates to antiviral therapy. Virology 289:150–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA version 4. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor DR, Shi ST, Romano PR, Barber GN, Lai MM (1999) Inhibition of the interferon-inducible protein kinase PKR by HCV E2 protein. Science 285:107–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor SS, Haste NM, Ghosh G (2005) PKR and eIF2α: integration of kinase dimerization activation substrate docking. Cell 122:823–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ukai K et al (2006) Mutations in carboxy-terminal part of E2 including PKR/eIF2α phosphorylation homology domain and interferon sensitivity determining region of nonstructural 5A of hepatitis C virus 1b: their correlation with response to interferon monotherapy and viral load. World J Gastroenterol 12:3722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang J, Yan R, Roy A, Xu D, Poisson J, Zhang Y (2015) The I-TASSER suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat methods 12:7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stem Cell Technology Research CenterTehranIran
  2. 2.Endocrine Research Center, Institute of Endocrinology and MetabolismIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations