Advertisement

Poly-arginine Peptide R18D Reduces Neuroinflammation and Functional Deficits Following Traumatic Brain Injury in the Long-Evans Rat

  • Li Shan ChiuEmail author
  • Ryan S. Anderton
  • Jane L. Cross
  • Vince W. Clark
  • Neville W. Knuckey
  • Bruno P. Meloni
Article

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated that the poly-arginine peptide R18 can improve histological and functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the Sprague–Dawley rat. Since D-enantiomer peptides are often exploited in pharmacology for their increased stability and potency, the present study compared the effects of R18 and its D-enantiomer, R18D, following TBI in the Long-Evans rat. Following a closed-head impact delivered via a weight-drop apparatus, peptide was administered at a dose of 1000 nmol/kg at 30 min after TBI. Treatment with R18D, but not R18 resulted in significant reductions in sensorimotor (p = 0.026) and vestibulomotor (p = 0.049) deficits as measured by the adhesive tape removal and rotarod tests. Furthermore, treatment with R18 and R18D resulted in a significant reduction in brain protein levels of the astrocytic marker, glial fibrillary acidic protein (p = 0.019 and 0.048, respectively). These results further highlight the beneficial effects of poly-arginine peptides in TBI, however additional studies are required to confirm these positive effects.

Keywords

Neuroprotection Arginine-rich Peptide TBI Inflammation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Neurotrauma Research Program of Western Australia, Insurance Commission of Western Australia, and Brain Foundation (Australia). Financial support was also provided by the Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science and the Department of Neurosurgery at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital. We thank Jim Litis for providing a student PhD scholarship for Li Shan Chiu. The authors would also like to thank Professor Frank Mastaglia for his assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Bruno P. Meloni and Neville W. Knuckey are the holders of several patents regarding the use of arginine-rich peptides as neuroprotective treatments. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. Abadji V, Lin S, Taha G et al (1994) (R)-methanandamide: a chiral novel anandamide possessing higher potency and metabolic stability. J Med Chem 37:1889–1893.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00038a020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anbanandam A, Albarado DC, Tirziu DC et al (2008) Molecular basis for proline- and arginine-rich peptide inhibition of proteasome. J Mol Biol 384:219–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brittain JM, Chen L, Wilson SM et al (2011) Neuroprotection against traumatic brain injury by a peptide derived from the collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2). J Biol Chem 286:37778–37792.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.255455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brustovetsky T, Pellman JJ, Yang X-F et al (2014) Collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2) interacts with N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger and regulates their functional activity. J Biol Chem 289:7470–7482.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.518472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron A, Appel J, Houghten RA, Lindberg I (2000) Polyarginines are potent furin inhibitors. J Biol Chem 275:36741–36749.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M003848200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakraborty S, Skolnick B, Narayan RK (2016) Neuroprotection trials in traumatic brain injury. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 16:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-016-0625-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Y, Brennan-Minnella AM, Sheth S et al (2015) Tat-NR2B9c prevents excitotoxic neuronal superoxide production. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 35:739–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiu LS, Anderton RS, Knuckey NW, Meloni BP (2016) The neuroprotective potential of arginine-rich peptides for the acute treatment of traumatic brain injury. Expert Rev Neurother 16:361–363.  https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.2016.1150180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiu LS, Anderton RS, Cross JL et al (2017a) Assessment of R18, COG1410, and APP96-110 in excitotoxicity and traumatic brain injury. Transl Neurosci 8:147–157.  https://doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2017-0021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiu LS, Anderton RS, Knuckey NW, Meloni BP (2017b) Peptide pharmacological approaches to treating traumatic brain injury: a case for arginine-rich peptides. Mol Neurobiol 54:7838–7857.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-016-0287-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dai D-F, Chen T, Szeto H et al (2011) Mitochondrial targeted antioxidant peptide ameliorates hypertensive cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards AB, Cross JL, Anderton RS et al (2018) Poly-arginine R18 and R18D (D-enantiomer) peptides reduce infarct volume and improves behavioural outcomes following perinatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy in the P7 rat. Mol Brain 11:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foda MA, Marmarou A (1994) A new model of diffuse brain injury in rats. Part II: Morphological characterization. J Neurosurg 80:301–313.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fotin-Mleczek M, Welte S, Mader O et al (2005) Cationic cell-penetrating peptides interfere with TNF signalling by induction of TNF receptor internalization. J Cell Sci 118:3339–3351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fugere M, Appel J, Houghten RA et al (2007) Short polybasic peptide sequences are potent inhibitors of PC5/6 and PC7: use of positional scanning-synthetic peptide combinatorial libraries as a tool for the optimization of inhibitory sequences. Mol Pharmacol 71:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gabbe BJ, Simpson PM, Harrison JE et al (2016) Return to work and functional outcomes after major trauma. Ann Surg 263:623–632.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaczynska M, Osmulski PA, Gao Y et al (2003) Proline- and arginine-rich peptides constitute a novel class of allosteric inhibitors of proteasome activity. Biochemistry 42:8663–8670.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi034784f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gao Y, Lecker S, Post MJ et al (2000) Inhibition of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway-mediated IκBα degradation by a naturally occurring antibacterial peptide. J Clin Invest 106:439–448.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI9826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gill J, Motamedi V, Osier N et al (2017) Moderate blast exposure results in increased IL-6 and TNFα in peripheral blood. Brain Behav Immun 65:90–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gu Q, Zhai L, Feng X et al (2013) Apelin-36, a potent peptide, protects against ischemic brain injury by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway. Neurochem Int 63:535–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hergenroeder GW, Moore AN, McCoy JP et al (2010) Serum IL-6: a candidate biomarker for intracranial pressure elevation following isolated traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation 7:19.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-7-19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoane MR, Pierce JL, Holland M et al (2007) The novel apolipoprotein E-based peptide COG1410 improves sensorimotor performance and reduces injury magnitude following cortical contusion injury. J Neurotrauma 24:1108–1118.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2006.0254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsieh T-H, Kang J-W, Lai J-H et al (2017) Relationship of mechanical impact magnitude to neurologic dysfunction severity in a rat traumatic brain injury model. PLoS ONE 12:e0178186.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang X, Glushakova O, Mondello S et al (2015) Acute temporal profiles of serum levels of UCH-L1 and GFAP and relationships to neuronal and astroglial pathology following traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 11:150514131534000.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.3873 Google Scholar
  25. Kacprzak MM, Peinado JR, Than ME et al (2004) Inhibition of furin by polyarginine-containing peptides: nanomolar inhibition by nona-D-arginine. J Biol Chem 279:36788–36794.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M400484200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kandler K, Shaykhiev R, Kleemann P et al (2006) The anti-microbial peptide LL-37 inhibits the activation of dendritic cells by TLR ligands. Int Immunol 18:1729–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kloß A, Henklein P, Siele D et al (2009) The cell-penetrating peptide octa-arginine is a potent inhibitor of proteasome activities. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 72:219–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laskowitz DT, Fillit H, Yeung N et al (2006) Apolipoprotein E-derived peptides reduce CNS inflammation: Implications for therapy of neurological disease. Acta Neurol Scand 114:15–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00680.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laskowitz DT, Wang H, Chen T et al (2017) Neuroprotective pentapeptide CN-105 is associated with reduced sterile inflammation and improved functional outcomes in a traumatic brain injury murine model. Sci Rep 7:46461.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46461 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lightfoot AP, Sakellariou GK, Nye GA et al (2015) SS-31 attenuates TNF-α induced cytokine release from C2C12 myotubes. Redox Biol 6:253–259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lynch JR, Tang W, Wang H et al (2003) APOE genotype and an ApoE-mimetic peptide modify the systemic and central nervous system inflammatory response. J Biol Chem 278:48529–48533.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M306923200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacDougall G, Anderton RS, Edwards AB et al (2016) The Neuroprotective peptide poly-arginine-12 (R12) reduces cell surface levels of NMDA NR2B receptor subunit in cortical neurons; investigation into the involvement of endocytic mechanisms. J Mol Neurosci 12:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-016-0861-1 Google Scholar
  33. Mao SS, Hua R, Zhao XP et al (2012) Exogenous administration of PACAP alleviates traumatic brain injury in rats through a mechanism involving the TLR4/MyD88/NF-kappaB pathway. J Neurotrauma 29:1941–1959.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marmarou A, Foda MA, van den Brink W et al (1994) A new model of diffuse brain injury in rats. Part I: Pathophysiology and biomechanics. J Neurosurg 80:291–300.  https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meloni BP, Brookes LM, Clark VW et al (2015a) Poly-arginine and arginine-rich peptides are neuroprotective in stroke models. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 35:993–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2015.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meloni BP, Milani D, Edwards AB et al (2015b) Neuroprotective peptides fused to arginine-rich cell penetrating peptides: neuroprotective mechanism likely mediated by peptide endocytic properties. Pharmacol Ther 153:36–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meloni BP, Milani D, Cross JL et al (2017) Assessment of the neuroprotective effects of arginine-rich protamine peptides, Poly-arginine peptides (R12-Cyclic, R22) and arginine–tryptophan-containing peptides following in vitro excitotoxicity and/or permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. NeuroMolecular Med 19:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12017-017-8441-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Milani D, Clark VW, Cross JL et al (2016a) Poly-arginine peptides reduce infarct volume in a permanent middle cerebral artery rat stroke model. BMC Neurosci 17:19.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0253-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Milani D, Knuckey NW, Anderton RS et al (2016b) The R18 polyarginine peptide is more effective than the TAT-NR2B9c (NA-1) peptide when administered 60 minutes after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Stroke Res Treat 2016:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2372710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Milani D, Cross JL, Anderton RS et al (2017) Neuroprotective efficacy of poly-arginine R18 and NA-1 (TAT-NR2B9c) peptides following transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Neurosci Res 114:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2016.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Milani D, Bakeberg MC, Cross JL et al (2018) Comparison of neuroprotective efficacy of poly-arginine R18 and R18D (D-enantiomer) peptides following permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the Wistar rat and in vitro toxicity studies. PLoS ONE 13:e0193884.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Sullivan M, Glorney E, Sterr A et al (2015) Traumatic brain injury and violent behavior in females: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav 25:54–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Plummer SL, Corrigan F, Thornton E et al (2018) The amyloid precursor protein derivative, APP96-110, is efficacious following intravenous administration after traumatic brain injury. PLoS ONE 13:e0190449.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramos-Molina B, Lick AN, Nasrolahi Shirazi A et al (2015) Cationic cell-penetrating peptides are potent furin inhibitors. PLoS ONE 10:e0130417.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roques BP, Noble F, Dauge V et al (1993) Neutral endopeptidase 24.11: structure, inhibition, and experimental and clinical pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev 45:87–146Google Scholar
  46. Schofield PW, Butler TG, Hollis SJ et al (2006) Traumatic brain injury among Australian prisoners: rates, recurrence and sequelae. Brain Inj 20:499–506.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050600664749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shohami E, Novikov M, Bass R et al (1994) Closed head injury triggers early production of TNFα and IL-6 by brain tissue. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 14:615–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shohami E, Ginis I, Hallenbeck JM (1999) Dual role of tumor necrosis factor alpha in brain injury. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 10(2):119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Szeto HH (2006) Mitochondria-targeted peptide antioxidants: Novel neuroprotective agents. AAPS J 8:E521–E531.  https://doi.org/10.1208/aapsj080362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Szeto HH, Liu S, Soong Y et al (2011) Mitochondria-targeted peptide accelerates ATP recovery and reduces ischemic kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 22:1041–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taupin V, Toulmond S, Serrano A et al (1993) Increase in IL-6, IL-1 and TNF levels in rat brain following traumatic lesion: influence of pre-and post-traumatic treatment with Ro5 4864, a peripheral-type (p site) benzodiazepine ligand. J Neuroimmunol 42:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Timonen M, Miettunen J, Hakko H et al (2002) The association of preceding traumatic brain injury with mental disorders, alcoholism and criminality: the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort Study. Psychiatry Res 113:217–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1781(02)00269-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tu TM, Kolls BJ, Soderblom EJ et al (2017) Apolipoprotein E mimetic peptide, CN-105, improves outcomes in ischemic stroke. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 4:246–265.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang YF, Xu X, Fan X et al (2011) A cell-penetrating peptide suppresses inflammation by inhibiting NF-κB signaling. Mol Ther 19:1849–1857.  https://doi.org/10.1038/MT.2011.82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wei X, Zhan C, Chen X et al (2014) Retro-inverso isomer of Angiopep-2: a stable D-peptide ligand inspires brain-targeted drug delivery. Mol Pharm 11:3261–3268.  https://doi.org/10.1021/mp500086e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams WH, Cordan G, Mewse AJ et al (2010) Self-reported traumatic brain injury in male young offenders: a risk factor for re-offending, poor mental health violence? Neuropsychol Rehabil 20:801–812.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2010.519613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Woodcock T, Morganti-Kossmann C (2013) The role of markers of inflammation in traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol 4:18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang Y, Zhang X-J, Li L-T et al (2016) Apelin-13 protects against apoptosis by activating AMP-activated protein kinase pathway in ischemia stroke. Peptides 75:96–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yoo SA, Bae DG, Ryoo JW et al (2005) Arginine-rich anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) hexapeptide inhibits collagen-induced arthritis and VEGF-stimulated productions of TNF-alpha and IL-6 by human monocytes. J Immunol (Baltimore MD 1950) 174:5846–5855.  https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.174.9.5846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yousefzadeh-Chabok S, Moghaddam AD, Kazemnejad-Leili E et al (2015) The relationship between serum levels of interleukins 6, 8, 10 and clinical outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Trauma Res 4:4–7.  https://doi.org/10.5812/atr.18357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ziebell JM, Morganti-Kossmann MC (2010) Involvement of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics 7:22–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational ScienceQEII Medical CentreNedlandsAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Neuromuscular and Neurological DisordersThe University of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Neurosurgery, Sir Charles Gairdner HospitalQEII Medical CentreNedlandsAustralia
  4. 4.School of Heath SciencesThe University Notre Dame AustraliaFremantleAustralia
  5. 5.Institute for Health ResearchThe University Notre Dame AustraliaFremantleAustralia

Personalised recommendations