This paper gives an account of the differences between polar and alternative questions, as well as an account of the division of labor between compositional semantics and pragmatics in interpreting these types of questions. Alternative questions involve a strong exhaustivity presupposition for the mentioned alternatives. We derive this compositionally from the meaning of the final falling tone and its interaction with the pragmatics of questioning in discourse. Alternative questions are exhaustive in two ways: they exhaust the space of epistemic possibilities, as well as the space of discourse possibilities (the Question Under Discussion). In contrast, we propose that polar questions are the opposite: they present just one alternative that is necessarily non-exhaustive. The account explains a range of response patterns to alternative and polar questions, as well as differences and similarities between the two types of questions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Adger D., Quer J. (2001) The syntax and semantics of unselected embedded questions. Language 77: 107–133
Aloni M. (2003) Free choice in modal contexts. Proceedings of SuB 7: 28–37
Aloni, M., Égré, P., & de Jager, T. (2009). Knowing whether A or B. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9646-1.
Aloni, M., & van Rooy, R. (2002). The dynamics of questions and focus. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT 12. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, CLC Publications.
Alonso-Ovalle, L. (2004). Simplification of disjunctive antecedents. In K. Moulton & M. Wolf (Eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (Vol. 34, pp. 1–15). Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
Alonso-Ovalle, L. (2005). Distributing the disjuncts over the modal space. In L. Bateman & C. Ussery (Eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society (Vol. 35). Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
Alonso-Ovalle, L. (2006). Disjunction in alternative semantics. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Aoun J., Li Y.-H. A. (2003) Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Baker, C. L. (1968). Indirect questions in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois.
Baker Carl Lee (1970) Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6: 197–219
Bartels C. (1999) The intonation of English statements and questions. Garland Publishing., New York
Barwise J., Cooper R. (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219
Beaver, D., & Clark, B. (2008). Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Wiley-Blackwell.
Beck S., Kim S.-S. (2006) Intervention effects in alternative questions. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9: 165–208
Belnap N., Steel T. (1976) The logic of questions and answers. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
Biezma, M. (2009). Alternative vs. polar questions: The cornering effect. In Proceedings of SALT 19.
Bolinger, D. (1978). Yes–no questions are not alternative questions. In H. Hiz (Ed.), Questions (pp. 87–105). Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
Bresnan, J. (1972). Theory of complementation in English syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Büring D. (2003) On D-Trees, Beans, and B-Accents. Linguistics & Philosophy 26: 511–545
Büring, D., & Gunlogson, C. (2000). Aren’t positive and negative polar questions the same? Manuscript, UCSC/UCLA.
Cable, S. (2007). The grammar of q: Q-particles and the nature of Wh-fronting, as revealed by the Wh-questions of Tlingit. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Chierchia G. (2006) Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–590
Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2009). Hurford’s constraint and the theory of scalar implicatures: Evidence for embedded implicatures. In P. Égré & G. Magri (Eds.) Presuppositions and implicatures. Proceedings of the MIT-Paris workshop (Vol. 60). MITWPL 60, Paris.
Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2011). The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. In K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, & P. Portner (Eds.) Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Eckardt, R. (2006). The syntax and pragmatics of embedded yes/no questions. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (Eds.), On information structure, meaning and form (pp. 447–466). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Farkas, D. (2007). The grammar of polarity particles in Romanian. Manuscript, UCSC
Farkas, D. (2009). Polarity particles in Hungarian. In M. den Dikken & R. M. Vago (Eds.), Approaches to Hungarian (Vol. 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Farkas D., Bruce K. (2010) On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27: 81–118
Fox, D. (2006). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. Manuscript, MIT.
Gawron, J. M. (2001). Universal concessive conditionals and alternative NPs in English. In C. Condoravdi & G. R. de Lavalette (Eds.), Logical perspectives on language and information. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Ginzburg, J. (1994). An update semantics for dialogue. In H. Bunt (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on computational semantics, Tilburg.
Ginzburg, J. (1996). Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In Language, logic, and computation (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: CSLI Lecture Notes.
Ginzburg, J. (2012). The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation. Oxford University Press.
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press. (Originally from the William James Lectures, Harvard University, 1967.)
Groenendijk, J. (1999). The Logic of Interrogation: Classical Version. In T. Matthews & D.L. Strolovitch (Eds.), The Proceedings of the ninth conference on semantics and linguistic theory. Ithaca, NY: CLC.
Groenendijk, J. (2009). Inquisitive semantics: Two possibilities for disjunction. In P. Bosch, D. Gabelaia, & J. Lang (Eds.), Seventh international Tbilisi symposium on language, logic, and computation. Berlin: Springer.
Groenendijk, J., & Roelofsen, F. (2009). Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. Paper presented at Stanford workshop on Language, Communication, and Rational Agency.
Groenendijk, J., & Stokhof, M. (1984). Studies in the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Groenendijk, J., & Stokhof, M. (1997). Questions. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of logic and language (pp. 1055–1124). Amsterdam/Cambridge: Elsevier/MIT Press.
Gunlogson C. (2001) True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. Rutledge, New York
Gunlogson C. (2008) A question of commitment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 101–136
Hamblin C.L. (1958) Questions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 36: 159–168
Hamblin C. L. (1973) Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53
Han, C., & Romero, M. (2002). Ellipsis and movement in the syntax of Whether /Q… or questions. In M. Hirotani (Ed.), Proceedings of the NELS (Vol. 32, pp. 197–216). Amherst: GLSA.
Han C., Romero M. (2004a) Disjunction, focus, and scope. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 179–217
Han C., Romero M. (2004b) The syntax of Whether /Q… or questions: Ellipsis combined with movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 527–564
Haspelmath, Martin, and Ekkehard König. (1998). Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. In J. van der Auwera (Ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Heim I. (1992) Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9: 183–221
Higginbotham J. (1991) Either/or. Proceedings of NELS 21: 143–155
Holmberg A. (2001) The syntax of Yes and No in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 55: 141–175
Holmberg A. (2007) Null subjects and polarity focus. Studia Linguistica 61: 212–236
Huddleston, R. (1994). The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics, 30(2), 411–439.
Isaacs J., Rawlins K. (2008) Conditional questions. Journal of Semantics 25: 269–319
Izvorski, R. (2000a). Free adjunct free relatives. In WCCFL 19 (pp. 232–245). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Izvorski, R. (2000b). Free relatives and related matters. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Karttunen L. (1973) Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 167–193
Karttunen L. (1977a) Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3–44
Karttunen, L. (1977b). To doubt whether. In The CLS book of squibs. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Karttunen, L., & Peters, S. (1976). What indirect questions conventionally implicate. In CLS 12, Chicago, IL
Kramer, R., & Rawlins, K. (2009). Polarity particles: An ellipsis account. In Proceedings of NELS 39. Amherst, MA: Graduate Student Linguistic Association.
Kramer, R., & Rawlins, K. (2010). Polarity particles and ellipsis: A (somewhat) cross-linguistic perspective. Paper presented at UCSC workshop on polarity particles.
Kratzer, A. (2005). Indefinites and their operators. In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), Reference and quantification: The Partee effect. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Kratzer, A., & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
(2001) Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics 9: 1–40
Ladd R. (1981) A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions.. Proceedings of CLS 17: 164–171
Laka, I. (1990). Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Larson R. (1985) On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 217–264
Lewis, D. (1979). A problem about permission. In E. Saarinenand et al. (Eds.), Essays in honor of Jaakko Hintikka. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Maier, E., & van der Sandt, R. (2003). Denial and correction in layered DRT. In Proceedings of DiaBruck’03.
McCloskey J. (1991) Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua 85: 259–302
Menéndez-Benito, P. (2006). The grammar of choice. Ph.D.dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Merchant, J. (2003). Remarks on stripping. Manuscript, University of Chicago.
Merchant J. (2006) Why no(t)?. Style 40: 20–23
Partee, B., & Rooth, M. (1983). Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In R. Bäurle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use, and the interpretation of language (pp. 361–393). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Pope, E. (1972). Questions and answers in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Pruitt, K. (2008a). Mapping prosody to interpretation in alternative questions. Paper presented at CUNY conference on human sentence processing.
Pruitt, K. (2008b). Perceptual relevance of prosodic features in non-wh-questions with disjunction. UMass Amherst, Amherst.
Pruitt, K. (2008c). Prosody and focus in alternative questions: Accounting for interpretation. In Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Pruitt, K., & Roelofsen, F. (2010). Disjunctive questions: Prosody, syntax and semantics. Manuscript, UMass Amherst, May 3, 2010.
Pruitt, K., & Roelofsen, F. (2011). Disjunctive questions: Prosody, syntax and semantics. Presented at a seminar at the Georg August Universität Göttingen.
Rawlins, K. (2008a). Unconditionals: An investigation in the syntax and semantics of conditional structures. Ph.D. dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.
Rawlins, K. (2008b) Unifying if-conditionals and unconditionals In Proceedings of SALT 18. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Rawlins, K. (in press). (Un)conditionals. Natural Language Semantics.
Reese, B. (2007). Bias in questions. Ph.D. dissertation, UT Austin.
Roberts, C. (1996). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In OSU Working papers in linguistics 49: Papers in semantics. (pp. 91–136). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
Roelofsen, F. (2012). Algebraic inquisitive semantics. Manuscript, University of Amsterdam.
Roelofsen, F., & van Gool, S. (2009). Disjunctive questions, inotnation, and highlighting. In Amsterdam Colloquium 10, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Romero M., Han C.-H. (2004) Negative yes-no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 609–658
Rooth, M., & Partee, B. (1982). Conjunction, type ambiguity, and wide scope “or”. In Proceedings of WCCFL 1. Stanford: CSLI.
Schiffrin, D. (1988). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simons M. (2005) Dividing things up: The semantics of or and the modal or interaction. Natural Language Semantics 13: 271–316
Spenader J., Maier E. (2009) Contrast as denial in multi-dimensional semantics. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1707–1726
Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Munitz & P. K. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy. New York: New York University Press.
Stalnaker R. (1975) Indicative conditionals. Philosophia 5: 269–286
Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 315–332). New York: Academic Press.
Stockwell, R., Schachter, P., & Partee, B. (1973). Major syntactic structures of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
van Rooy, R., & Safárová, M. (2003). On polar questions. In R. Young & Y. Zhou (Eds.), Semantics and Linguistics Theory 13. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
van Leusen N. (2004) Incompatibility in context: A diagnosis of correction. Journal of Semantics 21: 415–441
Velissaratou, S. (2000). Conditional questions and which-interrogatives. Master of Logic Thesis, University of Amsterdam. ILLC Publications.
von Stechow, A. (1991). Focusing and backgrounding operators. In W. Abraham (Ed.), Discourse particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
von Fintel, K. (2004). Would you believe it? The king of France is back! In A. Bezuidenhout & M. Reimer (Eds.), Descriptions and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zaefferer, D. (1990). Conditionals and unconditonals in universal grammar and situation semantics. In R. Cooper, K. Mukai, & J. Perry (Eds.), Situation theory and its applications I (pp. 471–492). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Zaefferer, D. (1991). Conditionals and unconditionals: Cross-linguistic and logical aspects. In D. Zaefferer (Ed.), Semantic universals and universal semantics. Berlin: Foris Publications.
Zimmermann, T. (Ed.). (2000). Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural Language Semantics, 8, 255–290.
About this article
Cite this article
Biezma, M., Rawlins, K. Responding to alternative and polar questions. Linguist and Philos 35, 361–406 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9123-z
- Alternative questions
- Polar questions