Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 257–303 | Cite as

Temporal reference in Paraguayan Guaraní, a tenseless language

Research Article

Abstract

This paper contributes data from Paraguayan Guaraní (Tupí-Guaraní) to the discussion of how temporal reference is determined in tenseless languages. The empirical focus of this study is on finite clauses headed by verbs inflected only for person/number information, which are compatible only with non-future temporal reference in most matrix clause contexts. The paper first explores the possibility of accounting for the temporal reference of such clauses with a phonologically empty non-future tense morpheme, along the lines of Matthewson’s (Linguist Philos 29:673–713, 2006) analysis of a similar phenomenon in St’át’imcets (Salish). This analysis is then contrasted with one according to which temporal reference is not constrained by tense in Paraguayan Guaraní, but only by context and temporal adverbials. A comparison of the two analyses, both of which are couched in a dynamic semantic framework, suggests empirical and theoretical advantages of the tenseless analysis over the tensed one. The paper concludes with a discussion of cross-linguistic variation of temporal reference in tensed and tenseless languages.

Keywords

Temporal reference Tenseless languages Paraguayan Guaraní Future discourse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abusch D. (1997) Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20(1): 1–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abusch D. (1998) Generalizing tense semantics for future contexts. In: Rothstein S. (eds) Events and grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 13–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aloni, M. (2000). Quantification under conceptual covers. Ph.D. thesis, ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. Bar-el, L. (2005). Aspectual distinctions in Skwxwú7mesh. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  5. Bar-el, L., Davis, H., & Matthewson, L. (2005). On non-culminating accomplishments. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society (Vol. 35). University of assachusetts, Amherst: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Beaver D. (2001) Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  7. Bittner M. (2005) Future discourse in a tenseless language. Journal of Semantics 22: 339–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bittner M. (2008) Aspectual universals of temporal anaphora. In: Rothstein S. (eds) Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Bittner, M. (to appear). Tense, mood, and centering. In R. Musan & M. Rathert (Eds.), Tense across languages. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  10. Bohnemeyer J. (2002) The grammar of time reference in Yukatek Maya. Lincom, MunichGoogle Scholar
  11. Bohnemeyer J. (2009) Temporal anaphora in a tenseless language. In: Klein W., Li P. (eds) The expression of time in language. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 83–128Google Scholar
  12. Bybee J., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. (1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Bybee J. L., Pagliuca W. (1987) The evolution of future meaning. In: Ramat A.G., Carruba O., Bernini G. (eds) Papers from the VIIth international conference on historical linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 109–122Google Scholar
  14. Chung S., Timberlake A. (1985) Tense, aspect and mood. In: Shoepen T. (eds) Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 202–258Google Scholar
  15. Comrie B. (1985) Tense. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Comrie B. (1989) On identifying future tense. In: Abraham W., Janssen T. (eds) Tempus, Aspekt, Modus: die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen, Niemeyer, pp 51–63Google Scholar
  17. Condoravdi C. (2002) Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. In: Beaver D., Martínez L.C., Clark B., Kaufmann S. (eds) The construction of meaning. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 59–87Google Scholar
  18. Copley, B. L. (2002). The semantics of the future. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
  19. Dahl Ö. (1985) Tense and aspect systems. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Dekker, P. (1993). Transsentential meditations. Ups and downs in dynamic semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  21. Deo A. (2009) Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: Partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics & Philosophy 32: 475–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dowty D. (1979) Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dowty D. (1986) The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics?. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 37–61Google Scholar
  24. Enç M. (1996) Tense and modality. In: Lappin S. (eds) The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Blackwell, London, pp 345–358Google Scholar
  25. Gennari S. (2003) Tense meaning and temporal interpretation. Journal of Semantics 20: 35–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gregores E., Suárez J.A. (1967) A description of colloquial Guaraní. Mouton de Gruyter, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  27. Groenendijk J. (2007). The logic of interrogation. In Aloni M., Butler A., Dekker P. (eds) Questions in dynamic semantics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 43-62Google Scholar
  28. Hamblin C. (1973) Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53Google Scholar
  29. Heim I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  30. Hinrichs E. (1986) Temporal anaphora in discourses of English. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 63–82Google Scholar
  31. Jóhannsdóttir, K. M., & Matthewson, L. (2007). Zero-marked tense: The case of Gitxsan. In Proceedings of NELS (Vol. 37). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
  32. Kamp H., Reyle U. (1993) From discourse to logic. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaufmann S. (2005) Conditional truth and future reference. Journal of Semantics 22(3): 231–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kiparsky, P. (2005). The Vedic injunctive: Historical and synchronic implications. In R. Singh & T. Bhattacharya (Eds.), The yearbook of south Asian languages and linguistics (pp. 219–235). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  35. Kissine M. (2008) Why will is not a modal. Natural Language Semantics 16: 129–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klein W. (1994) Time in language. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Kratzer, A. (1998). More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In D. Strolovitch & A. Lawson (Eds.), Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) (Vol. VIII, pp. 92–110). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Krivoshein de Canese, N., Gamba, C. M., & Alcaraz, F. A. (Eds.). (2005). Tetãgua Remimombéu: Cuentos Populares Paraguayos. Asunción, Paraguay: Servilibro.Google Scholar
  39. Lakoff, G. (1971). Presupposition and relative well-formedness. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics (pp. 329–340). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lee J., Tonhauser J. (2010) Temporal interpretation without tense: Coordination constructions in Korean and Japanese. Journal of Semantics 27: 307–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lin J.-W. (2003) Temporal reference in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12: 259–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lin J.-W. (2005) Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics 23: 1–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matthewson, L. (2002). Tense in St’át’imcets and in universal grammar. In C. Gillon, N. Sawai, & R. Wojdak (Eds.), Papers for the 37th international conference on Salish and neighbouring languages (Vol. 9). Vancouver: UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
  44. Matthewson, L. (2004a). On the absence of telic accomplishments in St’át’imcets. In Proceedings of the workshop on structure and constituency in languages of the Americas (Vol. 4). UBC: UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
  45. Matthewson L. (2004b) On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics 70(4): 369–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Matthewson L. (2006) Temporal semantics in a supposedly tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 673–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ministerio de Educación y Cultura. (2004). La educación bilingüe en la reforma educativa Paraguaya. Accessed September 30, 2008, from http://www.escuelaviva-mec.edu.py/investigaciones/60.pdf
  48. Nordlinger R., Sadler L. (2008). When is a temporal marker not a tense? Reply to Tonhauser (2007). Language, 84(2), 325–331.Google Scholar
  49. Ogihara, T. (1994). Adverbs of quantification and Sequence-of-Tense phenomena. In M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (Vol. IV, pp. 251–267). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  50. Ogihara T. (1996) Tense, attitude, and scope. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  51. Partee B.H. (1984) Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Portner P. (1998) The progressive in modal semantics. Language 74: 760–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reichenbach H. (1947) Elements of symbolic logic. UC Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  54. Ritter, E., & Wiltschko, M. (2005). Anchoring events to utterances without tense. In J. Alderete, C. Han, & A. Kochetov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th west coast conference on formal linguistics (WCCFL) (pp. 343–351). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
  55. Roberts C. (2004) Context in dynamic interpretation. In: Horn L., Ward G. (eds) Handbook of contemporary pragmatic theory. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 197–220Google Scholar
  56. Saint-Exupéry, A. D. (1946). The little prince. Paris: Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  57. Saint-Exupéry, A. D. (2005). Mitãmi (The little prince). Asunción, Paraguay: Espectrograf, Artes. Gráficas. Guaraní translation of Saint-Exupéry (1946) by De Las Nieves Domínguez and Enrique Chamorro.Google Scholar
  58. Sarkar, A. (1998). The conflict between future tense and modality: The case of will in English (Vol. 5.2, pp. 91–117). University of Pennsylvania: Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
  59. Sohn S.-O. (1999) Tense and aspect in Korean. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  60. Tonhauser, J. (2006). The temporal semantics of noun phrases: Evidence from Guaraní. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  61. Tonhauser J. (2007) Nominal tense? The meaning of Guaraní nominal temporal markers. Language 83(4): 831–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tonhauser, J. (2008). Defining cross-linguistic categories: The case of nominal tense. Reply to Nordlinger and Sadler (2008). Language, 84(2), 332–342.Google Scholar
  63. Tonhauser, J. (2009). Counterfactuality and future time reference: The case of Paraguayan Guaranímo’ã. In A. Riester & T. Solstad (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (Vol., 13 pp. 527–541).Google Scholar
  64. Tonhauser, J. (2010). Is Paraguayan Guaraní a tenseless language? In Proceedings of semantics of underrepresented languages of the Americas (SULA) (Vol. 2, pp. 227–242). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
  65. Tonhauser, J. (to appear). The future marker –ta of Paraguayan Guaraní: Formal semantics and crosslinguistic comparison. In R. Musan & M. Rathert (Eds.), Tense across languages. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  66. Velázquez-Castillo, M. (2004). Guaraní (Tupí-Guaraní). In G. E. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, & S. Skopeteas (Eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation (Vol. 2, pp. 1421–1432). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  67. Webber B.L. (1988) Tense as a discourse anaphor. Computational Linguistics 14: 61–73Google Scholar
  68. Werner T. (2006) Future and non-future modal sentences. Natural Language Semantics 14: 235–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations