Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 417–443 | Cite as

The character of quotation

  • Chung-chieh Shan
Research Article

Abstract

This paper presents syntactic and semantic rules for a fragment of English with mixed quotation. The fragment shows that quotation has a recursive and compositional structure. Quoted expressions turn out to denote characters, so the semantics of quotation simulates the pragmatics of speech, including dependence on utterance contexts and reference to mental entities. The analysis also accommodates varieties of unquotation, pure quotation, and causal reference.

Keywords

Mixed quotation Compositional semantics Utterance context Monads Type-lifting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, B. (2003). Some notes on quotation. In P. de Brabanter (Ed.), Hybrid quotations (Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17(1)) (pp. 13–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  2. Barker C. (2007) Direct compositionality on demand. In: Barker C, Jacobson P (eds) Direct compositionality. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 102–131Google Scholar
  3. Barker C, Shan C. (2008) Donkey anaphora is in-scope binding. Semantics and Pragmatics 1: 1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bawden, A. (1999). Quasiquotation in Lisp. In O. Danvy (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGPLAN workshop on partial evaluation and semantics-based program manipulation (pp. 4–12). BRICS.Google Scholar
  5. Bonami, O., & Godard, D. (2008). On the syntax of direct quotation in French. In S. Muller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th international conference on head-driven phrase structure grammar (pp. 358–377). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
  6. Boolos G. (1995) Quotational ambiguity. In: Leonardi P, Santambrogio M (eds) On Quine: New essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 283–296Google Scholar
  7. Cappelen H, Lepore E. (1997) Varieties of quotation. Mind 106: 429–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cappelen H, Lepore E. (2003) Varieties of quotation revisited. In: de Brabanter P (eds) Hybrid quotations (Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17(1)). John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 51–75Google Scholar
  9. Cappelen H, Lepore E. (2007) Language turned on itself: The semantics and pragmatics of metalinguistic discourse. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Carette J, Kiselyov O, Shan C. (2009) Finally tagless, partially evaluated: Tagless staged interpreters for simpler typed languages. Journal of Functional Programming 19: 509–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark H.H, Gerrig R.J. (1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66: 764–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidson D. (1979) Quotation. Theory and Decision 11: 27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Brabanter, P. (2005). Quotations and the intrusion of non-linguistic communication into utterances. In A. K. Dey, B. N. Kokinov, D. B. Leake, & R. M. Turner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th international and interdisciplinary conference on modeling and using context (pp. 126–139). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Geurts B, Maier E. (2003) Quotation in context. In: de Brabanter P (eds) Hybrid quotations (Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17(1)). John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 109–128Google Scholar
  15. Gomard C.K, Jones N.D. (1991) A partial evaluator for the untyped λ-calculus. Journal of Functional Programming 1: 21–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaplan D. (1989) Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In: Almog J, Perry J, Wettstein H (eds) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 481–563Google Scholar
  17. Karttunen L, Peters S.(1979). Conventional implicature. In C.-K. Oh & D. A. Dinneen (Eds.), Presupposition, no. 11 in syntax and semantics (pp. 1–56). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kripke S.A. (1980) Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Maier, E. (2006). Belief in context: Towards a unified semantics of de re and de se attitude reports. Doctoral Dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  20. Maier, E. (2008). Breaking quotations. In K. Satoh, A. Inokuchi, K. Nagao, & T. Kawamura (Eds.), New frontiers in artificial intelligence: Revised selected papers from JSAI 2007 conference and workshops (pp. 187–200). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Moggi E. (1991) Notions of computation and monads. Information and Computation 93: 55–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muller R. (1992) M-LISP: A representation-independent dialect of LISP with reduction semantics. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 14: 589–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nielson, F., & Nielson, H. R. (1988). Automatic binding time analysis for a typed λ-calculus. In POPL ’88: Conference record of the annual ACM symposium on principles of programming languages (pp. 98–106). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  24. Nielson F., Nielson H.R. (1992) Two-level functional languages. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Partee, B. H. (1973). The syntax and semantics of quotation. In S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 410–418). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  26. Postal, P. M. (2004). Skeptical linguistic essays (Chapt. 6) (The openness of natural languages). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Potts, C. (2003). The logic of conventional implicatures. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  28. Potts, C. (2007). The dimensions of quotation. In C. Barker & P. Jacobson (Eds.), Direct compositionality (pp. 405–431). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind and knowledge, no. 7 in Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 131–193). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  30. Quine W.V.O. (1940) Mathematical logic. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Recanati, F. (2001). Open quotation. Mind, 110, 637–687.Google Scholar
  32. Sams J. (2010) Quoting the unspoken: An analysis of quotations in spoken discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3147–3160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shan, C. (2001). Monads for natural language semantics. In K. Striegnitz (Ed.), Proceedings of the ESSLLI-2001 student session (pp. 285–298). Helsinki: 13th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information.Google Scholar
  34. Shan, C. (2007). Causal reference and inverse scope as mixed quotation. In M. Aloni, P. Dekker, & F. Roelofsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam colloquium (pp. 199–204). Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  35. Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Pragmatics, no. 9 in syntax and semantics (pp. 315–332). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Taha, W. (1999). Multi-stage programming: Its theory and applications. Doctoral Dissertation, Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  37. Wadler, P. L. (1992). The essence of functional programming. In POPL ’92: Conference record of the annual ACM symposium on principles of programming languages (pp. 1–14). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations