Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 289–328

Neg-Raising and Polarity

Research Article

Abstract

The representation of Neg-Raising in the grammar is a matter of controversy. I provide evidence for representing Neg-Raising as a kind of presupposition associated with certain predicates by providing a detailed analysis of NPI-licensing in Neg-Raising contexts. Specific features of presupposition projection are used to explain the licensing of strict NPIs under Neg-Raising predicates. Discussion centers around the analysis of a licensing asymmetry noted in Horn (1971, Negative transportation: Unsafe at any speed? In CLS 7 (pp. 120–133)).Having provided this analysis, I go on to discuss its implications for the theory of NPI-licensing more generally. In particular, I discuss how the present proposal reflects on von Fintel’s (1999, Journal of Semantics, 16, 97–148) proposal to use Strawson downward entailment in the statement of NPI-licensing principles.

Keywords

Neg-Raising Negative Polarity Items Presupposition projection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abusch, D. (2005). Triggering from alternative sets and projection of pragmatic presuppositions. Ms. Cornell University.Google Scholar
  2. Acquaviva P. (1997). The logical form of negation: A study of operator-variable structures in syntax. Garland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonso-Ovalle, L., & Guerzoni, E. (2004). Double negatives, negative concord and metalinguistic negation. In M. Andronis, E. Debenport, A. Pycha, & K. Yoshimura (Eds.), Proceedings of CLS 38-1: Main session (pp. 15–31). Chicago: CLS Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Atlas, J. (1974). Presupposition, ambiguity, and generality: A coda to the Russell-Strawson debate on referring. Unpublished Ms. Pomona College.Google Scholar
  5. Atlas J. (1996). ‘Only’ noun phrases, pseudo-negative generalized quantifiers, negative polarity items, and monotonicity. Journal of Semantics 13: 265–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartsch, R. (1973). “Negative Transportation” gibt es nicht. Linguistische Berichte, 27.Google Scholar
  7. Beaver, D. (1994). When variables don’t vary enough. In M. Harvey, & L. Santelmann (Eds.), Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory IV (pp. 35–60). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Beaver D., Krahmer E. (2001). Presupposition and partiality: Back to the future. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10(2): 147–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatt R. (2002). The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics 10: 43–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bochvar, D. (1939). Ob odnom trehznachom iscislenii i ego primeneii k analizu paradoksov klassicskogo rassirennogo funkcional ‘nogo iscislenija’. In Matematiciskij sbornik, 4 English translation (1981): “On a three-valued logical calculus and its applications to the analysis of the paradoxes of the classical extended functional calculus.” In History and Philosophy of Logic 2, 87–112.Google Scholar
  11. Chierchia, G., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1990). Meaning and grammar an introduction to semantics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Declerck R. (1995). The problem of not ... until. Linguistics 33: 51–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fillmore C. (1963). The position of embedding transformations in grammar. Word 19: 208–231Google Scholar
  14. von Fintel K. (1993). Exceptive constructions. Natural Language Semantics 1:123–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. von Fintel K. (1997). Bare plurals, bare conditionals and ‘only’. Journal of Semantics 14:1–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. von Fintel K. (1999). NPI-licensing, strawson entailment and context dependency. Journal of Semantics 16:97–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fodor, J. D. (1970). The linguistics description of opaque contexts. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  18. Gajewski, J. (to appear). Licensing strong NPIs. In The Proceedings of the Penn Linguistics Colloquium 31.Google Scholar
  19. Giannakidou, A. (1997). The landscape of polarity items. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  20. Giannakidou, A. (2002). UNTIL, aspect and negation: A novel argument for two untils. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory XII (pp. 84–103). Ithaca: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Giannakidou A. (2006). Only, emotive factives, and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language 82:575–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guerzoni, E. (2001). Italian n-words as NPIs. Talk at Incontro di Grammatica Generativa.Google Scholar
  23. Heim, I. (1983). On the projection problem for presuppositions. In M. Barlow, D. Flickinger, M. Westcoat (Eds.), Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 23 (pp. 114– 126). University of Stanford.Google Scholar
  24. Heim, I. (1984). A note on negative polarity and downward entailingness. In C. Jones, & P. Sells (Eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 14 (pp. 98–107). GLSA.Google Scholar
  25. Heim I. (1992). Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9: 183–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heim, I. (2000). Degree operators and scope. In B. Jackson, & T. Matthews (Eds.), Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory X (pp. 40–64). Ithaca: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Heim, I. (2006). Remarks on comparative clauses as generalized quantifiers. Ms. MIT.Google Scholar
  28. Herburger E. (1997). The negative concord puzzle revisited. Natural Language Semantics 9: 289–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herdan S. (2005). Who knows the only reading of only?.Snippets 10: 7–8Google Scholar
  30. Herdan S., Sharvit Y. (2006). Definite and non-definite superlatives and NPI-licensing. Syntax 9:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoeksema, J. (1986). Monotonie en superlatieven. In C. Hoppenbrouwers, J. Houtman, I. Schuurman, & F. Zwarts (Eds.), Proeven van taalwetenschap (pp. 38–49). Nederlands Instituut RUG, Gronigen.Google Scholar
  32. Hoeksema, J. (1996). In days, weeks, months, years, ages: A class of temporal negative polarity items. Ms. Groningen.Google Scholar
  33. Horn, L. R. (1969). A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In CLS 5 (pp. 97–108).Google Scholar
  34. Horn, L. R. (1971). Negative transportation: Unsafe at any speed? In CLS 7 (pp. 120–133).Google Scholar
  35. Horn, L. R. (1975). Neg-raising predicates: Toward an explanation. In CLS 11 (pp. 279-294).Google Scholar
  36. Horn, L. R. (1978). Remarks on neg-raising. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp. 129–220). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Horn, L. R. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 11–42). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Horn .R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Univeristy of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  39. Horn L.R. (2000). Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Horn L.R., Bayer S. (1984). Short-circuited implicature: A negative contribution. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 397–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Karttunen L. (1969). Some observations on factivity. Papers in Linguistics 5: 55–69Google Scholar
  42. Karttunen L. (1974a). Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181–193Google Scholar
  43. Karttunen, L. (1974b). Until. In CLS 10, 284–297.Google Scholar
  44. Kratzer, A. (1995). Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In G. Carlson, & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 125–175). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Ladusaw, W. (1979). Polarity as inherent scope relations. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  46. Ladusaw, W. (1992). Expressing negation. In C. Barker, & D. Dowty (Eds.), Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory II (pp. 237–259). Ithaca: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Lakoff, R. (1969). A syntactic argument for negative transportation. In CLS 5 (pp. 149–157).Google Scholar
  48. Lindholm, J. M. (1969). Negative-raising and sentence pronominalization. In Chicago Linguistics Society 5 (pp. 148–158).Google Scholar
  49. Löbner, S. (1987). Quantification as a major module of natural language semantics. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers (pp. 53–85). Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  50. Montgomery, M. B., & Hall, J. S. (2004). Dictionary of smoky Mountain English. Universtiy of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  51. Morgan, J. (1978). Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp. 261–280). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Penka, D., & von Stechow, A. (2001). Negativen indefinita unter modalverben. In R. Muller, M. Reis (Eds.), Modalitat und modalverben im deutschen, Sonderheft 9 edition.Google Scholar
  53. Potts, C. (2000). When even no’s neg is splitsville. URL: http://ling.ucsc.edu/Jorge/potts.html
  54. Prince E. (1976). The syntax and semantics of neg-raising, with evidence from French. Language 52: 404–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roberts, C. (1996). Anaphora in intensional contexts. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Ross, J. R. (1973). Slifting. In M. P. Schutzenburger, M. Gross, & M. Halle (Eds.), The formal analysis of natural languages: Proceedings of the first international conference (pp. 133–169). Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
  57. Rullmann H. (2003). Additive particles and polarity. Journal of Semantics 20: 329–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sadock, J. (1972). Speech act idioms. In CLS 8, 329–339.Google Scholar
  59. Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 59–82). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  60. Simons, M. (2001). On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson, & Z. Zvolensky (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory XI. Ithaca: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  61. de Swart H. (1996). Meaning and use of not ... until. Journal of Semantics 13: 221–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van der Wouden, T. (1995). A problem with the semantics of neg-raising. Ms.Google Scholar
  63. van der Wouden, T. (1997). Negative contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation. Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Zwarts, F. (1996). Facets of negation. In J. van der Does, & J. van Eijck (Eds.), Quantifiers, logic and language (pp. 385–421). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  65. Zwarts, F. (1998). Three types of polarity. In: Hamm F., Hinrichs E. (Eds.), Plural quantification (pp. 177–238). Dordrecht, Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations