Conditional assertion, denial, and supposition as illocutionary acts
Research Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
- 164 Downloads
Keywords
Conditional Statement Illocutionary Force Conditional Sentence Rational Commitment Conditional Assertion
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- F. Jackson, Mind, method and conditionals. London: Routledge (1998).Google Scholar
- Johnson-Laird, P. N., Girotto, V. & Legrenzi, P. (1999). Modelli mentali: Una guida facile per il profano, Sistemi Intelligenti, 9, 63–83. [“Mental models: a gentle guide for outsiders”]Google Scholar
- J.T. Kearns, Propositional logic of supposition and assertion. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (1997) 325-349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- J.T. Kearns, An illocutionary logical explanation of the surprise execution. History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (2000) 195-214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kearns, J. T. (2001). The rationality of reasoning: Commitment and coherence. In: B. Brogaard & B. Smith (Eds). Rationality and irrationality, proceedings of the 23rd international wittgensteinsymposium. Kirchberg-am-Wechsel (Austria) 2001. pp. 192–198.Google Scholar
- J.T. Kearns, Logic is the study of a human activity. In: T. Childers and O. Majer (eds.) The logica yearbook 2001. Prague: Filosofia (2002) pp. 101-110Google Scholar
- J.T. Kearns, The logic of coherent fiction. In: T. Childers and O. Majer (eds.) The logica yearbook 2002. Prague: Filosofia (2003) pp. 133-146Google Scholar
- J.T. Kearns, An illocutionary analysis of conditional assertions. In: L. Behounek (ed.) The logica yearbook 2003. Prague: Filosofia (2004) pp. 159-169Google Scholar
- Mackie J.L. (1973). Conditionals. In: Truth, probability and paradox, studies in philosophical logic. pp. 64–119, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- R.N. McLaughlin, On the logic of ordinary conditionals. Albany, N. Y: State University of New York Press (1990).Google Scholar
- G.E. Moore, Moore’s paradox. In: T. Baldwin (ed.) Selected writings. London: Routledge (1944) pp. 207-212Google Scholar
- D.H. Sanford, If P then Q. London and New York: Routledge (1989).Google Scholar
- D. Vanderveken and J. Searle, Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1985).Google Scholar
- D. Vanderveken, Meaning and speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1990).Google Scholar
- Vanderveken D. (2002). Success, satisfaction and truth in the logic of speech acts and formal semantics. In: Davis S., Gillan B. (eds). A reader in semantics. Forthcoming from Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- D.N. Walton and E.C.W. Krabbe, Commitment in dialogue, basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press (1995).Google Scholar
- D.N. Walton, One-sided arguments. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press (1999).Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006