Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 455–485 | Cite as

Conditional assertion, denial, and supposition as illocutionary acts

  • John T. KearnsEmail author
Research Article


Conditional Statement Illocutionary Force Conditional Sentence Rational Commitment Conditional Assertion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. F. Jackson, Mind, method and conditionals. London: Routledge (1998).Google Scholar
  2. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Girotto, V. & Legrenzi, P. (1999). Modelli mentali: Una guida facile per il profano, Sistemi Intelligenti, 9, 63–83. [“Mental models: a gentle guide for outsiders”]Google Scholar
  3. J.T. Kearns, Propositional logic of supposition and assertion. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (1997) 325-349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. J.T. Kearns, An illocutionary logical explanation of the surprise execution. History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (2000) 195-214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kearns, J. T. (2001). The rationality of reasoning: Commitment and coherence. In: B. Brogaard & B. Smith (Eds). Rationality and irrationality, proceedings of the 23rd international wittgensteinsymposium. Kirchberg-am-Wechsel (Austria) 2001. pp. 192–198.Google Scholar
  6. J.T. Kearns, Logic is the study of a human activity. In: T. Childers and O. Majer (eds.) The logica yearbook 2001. Prague: Filosofia (2002) pp. 101-110Google Scholar
  7. J.T. Kearns, The logic of coherent fiction. In: T. Childers and O. Majer (eds.) The logica yearbook 2002. Prague: Filosofia (2003) pp. 133-146Google Scholar
  8. J.T. Kearns, An illocutionary analysis of conditional assertions. In: L. Behounek (ed.) The logica yearbook 2003. Prague: Filosofia (2004) pp. 159-169Google Scholar
  9. Mackie J.L. (1973). Conditionals. In: Truth, probability and paradox, studies in philosophical logic. pp. 64–119, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. R.N. McLaughlin, On the logic of ordinary conditionals. Albany, N. Y: State University of New York Press (1990).Google Scholar
  11. G.E. Moore, Moore’s paradox. In: T. Baldwin (ed.) Selected writings. London: Routledge (1944) pp. 207-212Google Scholar
  12. D.H. Sanford, If P then Q. London and New York: Routledge (1989).Google Scholar
  13. D. Vanderveken and J. Searle, Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1985).Google Scholar
  14. D. Vanderveken, Meaning and speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1990).Google Scholar
  15. Vanderveken D. (2002). Success, satisfaction and truth in the logic of speech acts and formal semantics. In: Davis S., Gillan B. (eds). A reader in semantics. Forthcoming from Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. D.N. Walton and E.C.W. Krabbe, Commitment in dialogue, basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press (1995).Google Scholar
  17. D.N. Walton, One-sided arguments. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press (1999).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Center for Cognitive ScienceUniversity at BuffaloSUNY BuffaloNYUSA

Personalised recommendations