Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 661–738 | Cite as

Fragments and ellipsis

  • Jason Merchant


Fragmentary utterances such as ‘short’ answers and subsentential XPs without linguistic antecedents are proposed to have fully sentential syntactic structures, subject to ellipsis. Ellipsis in these cases is preceded by A′-movement of the fragment to a clause-peripheral position; the combination of movement and ellipsis accounts for a wide range of connectivity and anti-connectivity effects in these structures. Fragment answers furthermore shed light on the nature of islands, and contrast with sluicing in triggering island effects; this is shown to follow from an articulated syntax and the PF theory of islands. Fragments without linguistic antecedents are argued to be compatible with an ellipsis analysis, and do not support direct interpretation approaches to these phenomena.


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Syntactic Structure Direct Interpretation Fragment Answer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anagnostopoulou, Elena: 1994, Clitic Dependencies in Modern Greek, PhD thesis, University of Salzburg.Google Scholar
  2. Anagnostopoulou, ElenaRiemsdijk, HenkZwarts, Frans eds. 1997Materials on Left DislocationJohn BenjaminsAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoun, Joseph, Benmamoun, Elabbas 1998Minimality, Reconstruction, and PF MovementLinguistic Inquiry29569597Google Scholar
  4. Barton, Ellen 1990Nonsentential ConstituentsJohn BenjaminsAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton, Ellen 1998The Grammar of Telegraphic Structures: Sentential and Nonsentential DerivationJournal of English Linguistics263767Google Scholar
  6. Barton, Ellen, and Ljiljiana Progovac: to appear, ‘Nonsententials in Minimalism’, in Reinaldo Elugardo and Robert Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and Non-sentential Speech, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Bošković, Željko 2001On the Nature of the Syntax-phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related PhenomenaElsevierAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Bošković, Željko 2002On Multiple wh-frontingLinguistic Inquiry33351383Google Scholar
  9. Brunetti, Lisa: 2003a, A Unification of Focus, PhD thesis, University of Florence.Google Scholar
  10. Brunetti, Lisa 2003Information” Focus Movement in Italian and Contextua Constraints on EllipsisProceedings of 22nd West Conference on Formal LinguisticsCascadilla PressSomerville, MA95108Google Scholar
  11. Bühler, Karl 1934Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der SpracheFischerJenaGoogle Scholar
  12. Carston, Robyn 2002Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive PragmaticsMind and Language17127148Google Scholar
  13. Chao, Wynn 1987On EllipsisUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstGoogle Scholar
  14. Chomsky, Noam 1972Some Empirical Issues in the Theory of Transformational GrammarPeters, Stanley eds. The Goals of Linguistic TheoryPrentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs, NJ63130Google Scholar
  15. Chomsky, Noam 1981Lectures on Government and BindingForisDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Chomsky, Noam, Lasnik, Howard 1993The Theory of Principles and ParametersJacobs, JoachimStechow, ArnimSternefeld, WolfgangVennemann, Theo eds. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary ResearchDe GruyterBerlin506569Google Scholar
  17. Chung, Sandra, Ladusaw, William, McCloskey, James 1995Sluicing and Logical FormNatural Language Semantics3239282Google Scholar
  18. Cinque, Guglielmo 1990Types of A′-dependenciesMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Dikken, Marcel, Meinunger, André, Wilder, Chris 2000Pseudoclefts and EllipsisStudia Linguistica544989Google Scholar
  20. Dowty, David 1979Word Meaning and Montague GrammarD. ReidelDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. Elugardo, Reinaldo and Robert Stainton: to appear, ‘Shorthand, Syntactic Ellipsis, and the Pragmatic Determinants of what is Said: Critical Reflections on Stanley’s “Context and Logical Form” ’, Mind and Language.Google Scholar
  22. Fiengo, Robert, May, Robert 1994Indices and IdentityMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Fiengo, Robert, Huang, C.-T. James, Lasnik, Howard, Reinhart, Tanya 1988The syntax of wh-in situBorer, Hagit eds. Proceedings of 7th West Coast Conference on Formal LinguisticsCenter for the Study of Language and InformationStanford8198Google Scholar
  24. Flagg, Elissa 2001You” Can’t Say That: Restrictions on Overt Subjects in the English ImperativeMary, AdronisChris, BallHeidi, ElstonNeuvel, Sylvain eds. Proceedings from the Main Session of the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic SocietyChicago Linguistic SocietyChicago, IL161173Google Scholar
  25. Fox, Danny 1999Reconstruction, Binding Theory, and the Interpretation of ChainsLinguistic Inquiry30157196Google Scholar
  26. Fox, Danny, Lasnik, Howard 2003Successive-cyclic Movement and Island Repair: The Difference between Sluicing and VP-ellipsisLinguistic Inquiry34143154Google Scholar
  27. Fukaya, Teruhiko: 2002, ‘Sluicing and Stripping in Japanese’, Ms., University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  28. Fukaya, Teruhiko, Hoji, Hajime 1999Stripping and Sluicing in Japanese and Some ImplicationsBird, S.Carnie, A.Haugen, J.Norquest, P. eds. Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal LinguisticsCascadilla PressSomerville, MA145158Google Scholar
  29. Giannakidou, Anastasia 1998Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical DependencyJohn BenjaminsAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  30. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2000Negative ... Concord?Natural Language and Linguistic Theory18457523Google Scholar
  31. Ginzburg, Jonathan: 1992, ‘Questions, Queries and Facts: A Semantics and Pragmatics for Interrogatives’, PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  32. Ginzburg, Jonathan 1999Ellipsis Resolution with Syntactic PresuppositionsBunt, H.Muskens, R. eds. Computing Meaning: Current Issues in Computational SemanticsKluwer Academic PublishersDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  33. Ginzburg, Jonathan, Sag, Ivan 2000Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English InterrogativesCenter for the Study of Language and InformationStanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  34. Grewendorf, Günther 2001Multiple wh-frontingLinguistic Inquiry3287122Google Scholar
  35. Grohmann, Kleanthes 2003Prolific Domains. On the Anti-locality of Movement DependenciesJohn BenjaminsAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  36. Hankamer, Jorge 1973Unacceptable AmbiguityLinguistic Inquiry41768Google Scholar
  37. Hankamer, Jorge 1978On the Nontransformational Derivation of Some Null VP AnaphorsLinguistic Inquiry96674Google Scholar
  38. Hankamer, Jorge: 1979, Deletion in Coordinate Structures, Garland, New York. (PhD thesis, Yale University, 1971.)Google Scholar
  39. Hankamer, Jorge, Ivan, Sag 1976Deep and Surface AnaphoraLinguistic Inquiry7391428Google Scholar
  40. Hartmann, Katharina 2000Right Node Raising and Gapping: Interface Conditions on Prosodic DeletionJohn BenjaminsAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  41. Hausser, Roland, Zaefferer, Dietmer 1978Questions and Answers in a Contextdependent Montague GrammarGuenther, F.Schmidt, S. J. eds. Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural LanguageD. ReidelDordrecht339358Google Scholar
  42. Hiraiwa, Ken, Ishihara, Shinichiro 2002Missing Links: Cleft, Sluicing, and ‘No Da’ Construction in JapaneseMIT Working Papers in Linguistics433554Google Scholar
  43. Hoji, Hajime: 1987, ‘Japanese Clefts and Reconstruction/Chain Binding Effects’, Handout of Talk Presented at WCCFL 6, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  44. Hoji, Hajime: 1990, ‘Theories of Anaphora and Aspects of Japanese Syntax’, Ms., University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  45. Hoji, Hajime and Teruhiko Fukaya: 2001, ‘On Island Repair and CM vs. Non-CM Constructions in English and Japanese’, Handout of Presentation at Kaken Workshop on Ellipsis, Kyoto.Google Scholar
  46. Horn, Laurence R. 1989A Natural History of NegationUniversity of Chicago PressChicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  47. Jackendoff, Ray 2002Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, EvolutionOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Jespersen, Otto 1924The Philosophy of GrammarGeorge Allen & UnwinLondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Johnson, Kyle 1996Search of the Middle FieldMs., University of MassachusettsAmherstGoogle Scholar
  50. Johnson, Kyle 2001What VP-ellipsis Can Do, What it Can’t, But Not WhyBaltin, MarkCollins, Chris eds. The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic TheoryBlackwellMalden, MA439479Google Scholar
  51. Johnson, Kyle 2002Towards an Etiology of Adjunct IslandsMs., University of MassachusettsAmherstGoogle Scholar
  52. Kehler, Andrew 2002Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of GrammarCenter for the Study of Language and InformationStanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  53. Kennedy, Christopher, Merchant, Jason 2000Attributive Comparative DeletionNatural Language and Linguistic Theory1889146Google Scholar
  54. Kitahara, Hisatsugu 1999Eliminating * as a Feature (of Traces)Epstein, Samuel DavidHornstein, Norbert eds. Working MinimalismMIT PressCambridge, MA7793Google Scholar
  55. Klein, Wolfgang 1985Ellipse, Fokusgliederung und thematischer StandMeyer-Hermann, ReinhardRieser, Hannes eds. Ellipsen und fragmentarische AusdrückeNiemeyerTübingen124Google Scholar
  56. Klein, Wolfgang 1993EllipseJacobs, JoachimStechow, ArnimSternefeld, WolfgangVennemann, Theo eds. Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary ResearchDe GruyterBerlin763799Google Scholar
  57. Kuno, Susumu, Robinson, Jane 1972Multiple wh-questionsLinguistic Inquiry3463487Google Scholar
  58. Lasnik, Howard 2001When Can you Save a Structure by Destroying It?Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society31301320Google Scholar
  59. Lasnik, Howard, Saito, Marmoru 1984On the Nature of Proper GovernmentLinguistic Inquiry15235289Google Scholar
  60. Lasnik, Howard, Saito, Marmoru 1992Move αMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  61. Lobeck, Anne 1991The Phrase Structure of EllipsisRothstein, Susan eds. Perspectives on Phrase StructureAcademic PressSan Diego81103Google Scholar
  62. Lobeck, Anne 1995Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and IdentificationOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  63. Ludlow, Peter: to appear, ‘A Note on Alleged Cases of Nonsentential Assertion’, in Reinaldo Elugardo and Robert Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and Non-sentential Speech, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  64. McCawley, James 1991Contrastive Negation and Metalinguistic NegationDobrin, LiseNichols, LynnRodriguez, Rosa eds. CLS 27: The Parasession on NegationChicago Linguistic SocietyChicago, IL189206Google Scholar
  65. McCloskey, James 1996On the Scope of Verb Movement in IrishNatural Language and Linguistic Theory1447104Google Scholar
  66. Merchant, Jason 1998“Pseudosluicing”: Elliptical Clefts in Japanese and EnglishZAS Working Papers in Linguistics1088112Google Scholar
  67. Merchant, Jason 2001The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of EllipsisOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  68. Merchant, Jason 2003Subject-Auxiliary Inversion in Comparatives and PF Output ConstraintsSchwabe, KerstinWinkler, Susanne eds. The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted StructuresJohn BenjaminsAmsterdam5577Google Scholar
  69. Merchant, Jason: 2003b, ‘Remarks on Stripping’, Ms., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  70. Merchant, Jason 2004Resumptivity and Non-movementStudies in Greek Linguistics 24Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  71. Merchant, Jason: to appear, ‘Variable Island Repair under Ellipsis’, in Kyle Johnson (ed.), Topics in Ellipsis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  72. Morgan, Jerry 1973Sentence Fragments and the Notion “sentence”Kachru, BrajLees, RobertMalkiel, YakovPietrangeli, AngelinaSaporta, Sol eds. Issues in LinguisticsUniversity of Illinois PressUrbana719751Google Scholar
  73. Morgan, Jerry 1989Sentence Fragments RevisitedMusic, BradleyGraczyk, RandolphWiltshire, Caroline eds. CLS 25, Parasession on Language in ContextChicago Linguistic SocietyChicago228241Google Scholar
  74. Müller, Gereon 1997Incomplete Category Fronting: A Derivational Approach to Remnant Movement in GermanKluwer Academic PublishersDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  75. Nakamura, Masanori: 2002, ‘Locality under Ellipsis in Japanese’, Ms., Senshu University, Leiden University.Google Scholar
  76. Napoli, Donna Jo 1982Initial Material Deletion in EnglishGlossa1685111Google Scholar
  77. No, Yongkyoon 1991A Centering Approach to the (CASE)(TOPIC) Restriction in KoreanLinguistics29653668Google Scholar
  78. Nunes, Jairo, Uriagereka, Juan 2000Cyclicity and Extraction DomainsSyntax32043Google Scholar
  79. Plank, Frans 1995Double Case: Agreement by SuffixaufnahmeOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Postal, Paul 1993Remarks on Weak CrossoverLinguistic Inquiry24539556Google Scholar
  81. Postal, Paul 1998Three Investigations of ExtractionMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  82. Potsdam, Eric: 1998, Syntactic Issues in the English Imperative, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  83. Pullum, Geoffrey: 2001, ‘Hankamer Was!’, in Chung, Sandra, James McCloskey, and Nathan Sanders (eds.), The Jorge Hankamer WebFest, University of California, Santa Cruz; Scholar
  84. Reich, Ingo 2002Question/Answer Congruence and the Semantics of wh-phrasesTheoretical Linguistics287394Google Scholar
  85. Reich, Ingo 2003Frage, Antwort und FokusAkademie VerlagBerlinGoogle Scholar
  86. Richards, Norvin 2001Movement in Language: Interactions and ArchitecturesOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  87. Riemsdijk, Henk 1978A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness: The Binding Nature of Prepositional PhrasesPeter De RidderDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  88. Rizzi, Luigi 1997The Fine Structure of the Left PeripheryHaegeman, Liliane eds. Elements of GrammarKluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht281337Google Scholar
  89. Ross, John R.: 1967, ‘Constraints on Variables in Syntax’, PhD thesis, MIT. [Published 1986 as Infinite Syntax, Ablex: New York.]Google Scholar
  90. Ross, John R. 1969Guess Who?Binnick, RobertDavison, AliceGreen, GeorgiaMorgan, Jerry eds. Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic SocietyChicago Linguistic SocietyChicago, IL252286Google Scholar
  91. Ross, Haj: 2000, ‘Inversion and Coreference in Pseudoclefts’, Ms., University of North Texas.Google Scholar
  92. Sadock, Jerrold 1974Read at Your Own Risk: Syntactic and Semantic Horrors You Can Find in Your Own Medicine ChestPapers from the 10th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic SocietyChicago Linguistic SocietyChicago, IL599607Google Scholar
  93. Sag, Ivan 1976Deletion and Logical FormGarland PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  94. Saito, Mamoru: 1985, ‘Some Asymmetries in Japanese and Their Theoretical Implications’, PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
  95. Schachter, Paul 1977Does She or Doesn’t She?Linguistic Inquiry8763767Google Scholar
  96. Schachter, Paul 1978English PropredicatesLinguistic Analysis4187224Google Scholar
  97. Schank, Roger, Abelson, Robert 1977Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge StructuresLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  98. Schlenker, Philippe 2003Clausal Equations (A Note on the Connectivity Problem)Natural Language and Linguistic Theory21157214Google Scholar
  99. Schwabe, Kerstin 1994Syntax und Semantik Situativer EllipsenGunter NarrTübingenGoogle Scholar
  100. Shopen, Tim: 1972, ‘A Generative Theory of Ellipsis: A Consideration of the Linguistic Use of Silence’, Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  101. Shopen, Tim 1973Ellipsis as Grammatical IndeterminacyFoundations of Language106577Google Scholar
  102. Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre 1986RelevanceBlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  103. Stainton, Robert 1995Non-sentential Assertions and Semantic EllipsisLinguistics and Philosophy18281296Google Scholar
  104. Stainton, Robert 1997Utterance Meaning and Syntactic EllipsisPragmatics and Cognition55178Google Scholar
  105. Stainton, Robert 1998Quantifier Phrases, Meaningfulness ‘In Isolation’, and EllipsisLinguistics and Philosophy21311340Google Scholar
  106. Stainton, Robert: to appear, ‘In Defense of Non-sentential Assertion’, in Zoltan Szabo (ed.), Semantics vs. Pragmatics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  107. Stanley, Jason 2000Context and Logical FormLinguistics and Philosophy23391434Google Scholar
  108. Stowell, Tim: 1981, ‘Origins of Phrase Structure’, PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
  109. Sütterlin, Ludwig 1907Die deutsche Sprache der GegenwartVoigtländerLeipzigGoogle Scholar
  110. Tomioka, Satoshi: 2003, ‘Another Sloppy Identity Puzzle’, Ms., University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  111. Uriagereka, Juan 1999Minimal Restrictions on Basque MovementsNatural Language and Linguistic Theory17403444Google Scholar
  112. Vat, Jan: 1981, ‘Left Dislocation, Connectedness, and Reconstruction’, Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik Nr. 20. [Reprinted in Anagnostopoulou, Elena, Henk van Riemsdijk, and Frans Zwarts (eds.), 1997, Materials on Left Dislocation, pp. 67–92, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.]Google Scholar
  113. Webelhuth, Gert 1992Principles and Parameters of Syntactic SaturationOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  114. Wilder, Chris 1997Some Properties of Ellipsis in CoordinationAlexiadou, ArtemisHall, Tracy eds. Studies in Universal Grammar and Typological VariationJohn BenjaminsAmsterdam59107Google Scholar
  115. Winkler, Susanne: 2003, Ellipsis at the Interfaces, Habilitationsschrift, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
  116. Yanofsky, Nancy 1978NP UtterancesFarkas, DonkaJacobsen, WesleyTodrys, Karol eds. CLS 14Chicago Linguistic SocietyChicago, IL491502Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Merchant
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations