Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 135–166

Unarticulated Constituents Revisited


DOI: 10.1007/s10988-005-4740-4

Cite this article as:
Martí, L. Linguistics & Philosophy (2006) 29: 135. doi:10.1007/s10988-005-4740-4


An important debate in the current literature is whether “all truth-conditional effects of extra-linguistic context can be traced to [a variable at; LM] logical form” (Stanley, ‘Context and Logical Form’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 23 (2000) 391). That is, according to Stanley, the only truth-conditional effects that extra-linguistic context has are localizable in (potentially silent) variable-denoting pronouns or pronoun-like items, which are represented in the syntax/at logical form (pure indexicals like I or today are put aside in this discussion). According to Recanati (‘Unarticulated Constituents’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 25 (2002) 299), extra-linguistic context can have additional truth-conditional effects, in the form of optional pragmatic processes like ‘free enrichment’. This paper shows that Recanati’s position is not warranted, since there is an alternative line of analysis that obviates the need to assume free enrichment. In the alternative analysis, we need Stanley’s variables, but we need to give them the freedom to be or not to be generated in the syntax/present at logical form, a kind of optionality that has nothing to do with the pragmatics-related optionality of free enrichment.

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Linguistics (CASTL)Universitetet i TromsøTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations