Lifetime Data Analysis

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 143–167

Dynamic path analysis—a new approach to analyzing time-dependent covariates

  • Johan Fosen
  • Egil Ferkingstad
  • Ørnulf Borgan
  • Odd O. Aalen
Article

Abstract

In this article we introduce a general approach to dynamic path analysis. This is an extension of classical path analysis to the situation where variables may be time-dependent and where the outcome of main interest is a stochastic process. In particular we will focus on the survival and event history analysis setting where the main outcome is a counting process. Our approach will be especially fruitful for analyzing event history data with internal time-dependent covariates, where an ordinary regression analysis may fail. The approach enables us to describe how the effect of a fixed covariate partly is working directly and partly indirectly through internal time-dependent covariates. For the sequence of times of event, we define a sequence of path analysis models. At each time of an event, ordinary linear regression is used to estimate the relation between the covariates, while the additive hazard model is used for the regression of the counting process on the covariates. The methodology is illustrated using data from a randomized trial on survival for patients with liver cirrhosis.

Keywords

Additive regression model Counting processes Direct effect Event history analysis Graphical models Indirect effect Internal covariates Survival analysis Time-dependent covariates Total effect 

References

  1. Aalen OO (1980) A model for nonparametric regression analysis of counting processes. Springer Lect Notes Stat 2:1–25MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Aalen OO (1987) Dynamic modelling and causality. Scand Actuarial J 12:177–190Google Scholar
  3. Aalen OO (1989) A linear regression model for the analysis of life times. Stat Med 8:907–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aalen OO, Fosen J, Wedon-Fekjær H, Borgan Ø, Husebye E (2004) Dynamic analysis of multivariate failure time data. Biometrics 60:764–773MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen PK, Borgan Ø, Gill RD, Keiding N (1993) Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersen PK, Liestøl K (2003) Attenuation caused by infrequently updated covariates in survival analysis. Biostatistics 4:633–649MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleveland WS (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74:829–836MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox DR, Wermuth N (1996) Multivariate dependencies. Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
  9. Didelez V (2000) Graphical models for event history data based on local independence. PhD thesis, Universität Dortmund, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards D (2000) Introduction to graphical modelling, 2nd edn. Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  11. Efron B (1981) Censored data and the bootstrap. J Am Stat Assoc 76:312–319MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Fosen J, Borgan Ø, Weedon-Fekjær H, Aalen OO (2006) Dynamic analysis of recurrent event data using the additive hazard model. Biometrical J, DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200510217Google Scholar
  13. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2001) The elements of statistical learning - data mining, inference and prediction. Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  14. Hesslow G (1976) Discussion: two notes on the probabilistic approach to causality. Philos Sci 43:290–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalbfleisch J, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data, 2nd edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  16. Lauritzen S (1996) Graphical models. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Loehlin JC (2004) Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis, 4th edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  18. Pearl J (2001) Direct and indirect effects. In: Breese J, Koller D (eds) Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, pp 411–420Google Scholar
  19. Wright S (1921) Correlation and causation. J Agr Res 20:557–585Google Scholar
  20. Wright S (1934) The method of path coefficients. Ann Math Stat 5:161–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Fosen
    • 1
  • Egil Ferkingstad
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ørnulf Borgan
    • 3
  • Odd O. Aalen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical SciencesUniversity of OsloBlindern, OsloNorway
  2. 2.Centre for Integrative GeneticsAasNorway
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations