Lifetime Data Analysis

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 41–59 | Cite as

A Distribution for Multivariate Frailty Based on the Compound Poisson Distribution with Random Scale

Article

Abstract

Frailty models are often used to model heterogeneity in survival analysis. The most common frailty model has an individual intensity which is a product of a random factor and a basic intensity common to all individuals. This paper uses the compound Poisson distribution as the random factor. It allows some individuals to be non-susceptible, which can be useful in many settings. In some diseases, one may suppose that a number of families have an increased susceptibility due to genetic circumstances. Then, it is logical to use a frailty model where the individuals within each family have some shared factor, while individuals between families have different factors. This can be attained by randomizing the Poisson parameter in the compound Poisson distribution. To our knowledge, this is a new distribution. The power variance function distributions are used for the Poisson parameter. The subsequent appearing distributions are studied in some detail, both regarding appearance and various statistical properties. An application to infant mortality data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway is included, where the model is compared to more traditional shared frailty models.

Keywords

compound Poisson dependence frailty heterogeneity multivariate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aalen, O. O. 1992“Modelling heterogeneity in survival analysis by the compound Poisson distribution”Annals of Applied Probability2951972Google Scholar
  2. Aalen, O. O., Tretli, S. 1999“Analyzing incidence of testis cancer by means of a frailty model”Cancer Causes and Controlvol. 10pp. 285292Google Scholar
  3. Bergman, E. M., Miller, W. R., Vines, N., Lief, H. I. 1977“ The age 30 crisis and the 7-year-itch”Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy3197204Google Scholar
  4. Berkson, J., Gage, R. P. 1952“Survival curve for cancer patients following treatment”Journal of the American Statistical Association47501515Google Scholar
  5. Boag, J. W. 1949“Maximum likelihood estimates of the proportion of patients cured by cancer therapyJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series111544Google Scholar
  6. Henderson, B. E., Ross, R., Bernstein, L. 1988“Estrogens as a cause of human cancer: The Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Foundation Award Lecture”Cancer Research48246253Google Scholar
  7. Hougaard, P. 1984“Life table methods for heterogeneous populations: Distributions describing the heterogeneity”Biometrika717583Google Scholar
  8. Hougaard, P. 1986“Survival models for heterogeneous populations derived from stable distributions”Biometrika73387396Google Scholar
  9. Hougaard, P. 2000Analysis of Multivariate Survival DataSpringer-VerlagNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Longini, I. M., Halloran, M. E. 1996“A frailty mixture model for estimating vaccine efficacy”Applied Statistics45165173Google Scholar
  11. Moger, T. A., Aalen, O. O., Heimdal, K., Gjessing, H. K. 2004“Analysis of testicular cancer data by means of a frailty model with familial dependence”Statistics in Medicine23617632Google Scholar
  12. Petersen, J. H. 1998“An additive frailty model for correlated life times”Biometrics54646661Google Scholar
  13. Price, D. L., Manatunga, A. K. 2001“Modelling survival data with a cured fraction using frailty models”Statistics in Medicine2015151527Google Scholar
  14. Ripatti, S., Palmgren, J. 2000“Estimation of multivariate frailty models using penalized partial likelihood”Biometrics5610161022Google Scholar
  15. Wanderås, E. H., Tretli, S., Fosså, S. D. 1995“Trends in incidence of testicular cancer in Norway 1955–1992”European Journal of Cancer31A20442048Google Scholar
  16. yen, N., Skærven, R., Irgens, L. M. 1996“Population-based recurrence risk of sudden infant death syndrome compared with other infant and fetal deaths”American Journal of Epidemiology144300306Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Medical StatisticsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations