Abstract
The ability for students to maintain attention to classroom instruction is a critical factor for learning because loss of instructional time due to off-task behaviour has negative impacts on academic achievement. Early studies suggest that use of kinesthetic equipment in place of traditional seating in classrooms can improve student on-task behaviour. To date, however, limitations of the kinesthetic classroom research literature include small sample sizes, often without controls, use of a single equipment type (e.g. standing desks or exercise balls) and lack of objective measures of student on-task behaviour. We report a pilot study of the impact of using a variety of kinesthetic equipment in elementary classrooms on objectively-measured student on-task behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvarez-Bueno, C., Pesce, I., Cavero-Redondo, M., Sanchez-Lopez, M., Garrido-Miguel, V., & Martinez-Vizcaino, (2017). Academic achievement and physical activity: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 140, e20171498.
Baker, R. S. (2007). Modeling and understanding students’ off- task behaviour in intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2007: Computer–human interaction (pp. 1059–1068).
Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Herson, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Bartholomew, J. B., & Jowers, E. M. (2011). Physically active academic lessons in elementary children. Preventative Medicine, 52, S51–S54.
Benes, S., Finn, K. E., Sullivan, E. C., & Yan, Z. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of using movement in the classroom. Physical Educator, 73, 110–135.
Berlin, L., & Bohlin, G. (2002). Response inhibition, hyperactivity, and conduct problems among preschool children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 242–251.
Blair, C., & Diamond, A. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: The promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 899–911.
Davis, C. L., Tomporowski, P. D., McDowell, J. E., Austin, B. P., Miller, P. H., Yanasak, N. E., Allison, J. D., & Naglieri, J. A. (2011). Exercise improves executive function and achievement and alters brain activation in overweight children: A randomized controlled trial. Health psychology, 30(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021766.
Dornhecker, M., Blake, J., Benden, M., Zhao, H., & Wendel, M. (2015). The effect of stand-biased desks on academic engagement: An exploratory study. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 53, 271–280.
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2004). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms (6th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ernst, M. D. (2004). Permutation methods: A basis for exact inference. Statistical Science, 19, 676–685.
Erwin, H., Able, M. G., Beighle, A., & Beets, M. W. (2009). Promoting children’s health through psychically active math classes: A pilot study. Health Promotion and Practice, 12, 244–251.
Erwin, H. E., Fedewa, A., Ahn, S., & Thornton, M. (2016). Elementary students’ physical activity levels and behavior when using stability balls. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(2), 700220010.
Fedewa, A., Davis, M. A., & Ahn, S. (2015). Effects of stability balls on children’s on-task behavior, academic achievement, and discipline referrals: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(2), 6902220020.
Fedewa, A. L., & Erwin, H. E. (2011). Stability balls and students with attention and hyperactivity concerns: Implications for on-task and in-seat behavior. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 393–399.
Gaston, A., Moore, S., & Butler, L. (2016). Sitting on a stability ball improves attention span and reduces anxious/depressive symptomatology among grade 2 students: A prospective case-control field experiment. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 136–142.
Kibbe, D. L., Hackett, J., Hurley, M., McFarland, A., Schubert, K. G., Schultz, A., et al. (2011). Ten years of take 10! Integrating physical activity with academic concepts in elementary classrooms. Preventative Medicine, 52, S43–S50.
Koepp, G. A., Sneeden, B. J., Flynn, L., Puccinelli, D., Hunstman, B., & Levine, J. A. (2012). Feasibility analysis of standing desks for sixth graders. Infant, Child & Adolescent Nutrition, 4, 89–92.
Lee, S. W., Kelly, K. E., & Nyre, J. E. (1999). Preliminary report on the relation of students’ on-task behavior with completion of school work. Psychological Reports, 84, 267–272.
Mehta, R. K., Shortz, A. E., & Benden, M. E. (2015). Stand-biased up for learning: A pilot investigation on the neurocognitive benefits of stand-biased school desks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(1), 59.
Minges, K. E., Chao, A. M., Irwin, M. L., Owen, N., Park, C., Whittemore, R., et al. (2016). Classroom stand-biased desks and sedentary behavior: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 137, e20153087.
Mitchell, S. (1979). Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 376–390.
Mitchell, J. A., Pate, R. R., Dowda, M., Mattocks, C., Riddoch, C., Ness, A. R., et al. (2012). A prospective study of sedentary behavior in a large cohort of youth. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 44, 1081–1087.
Mullender-Wijnsma, M. J., Harman, E., de Greef, J. W., Doolaard, S., Bosker, R. J., & Visscher, C. (2016). Physically active math and language lessons improve academic achievement: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 137, e20152743.
Mulrine, C. F., Prater, M. A., & Jenkins, A. (2008). The active classroom: Supporting students with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder through exercise. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 16–22.
Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R. S. J. D., & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2012). Baker–Rodrigo Observation Method Protocol (BROMP) 1.0. Training Manual version 1.0 (Technical report). Manila: Ateneo Laboratory for the Learning Sciences.
Posner, M. I., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (1998). Executive attention: Conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 401–423). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Reilly, E., Buskist, C., & Gross, M. K. (2012). Movement in the classroom: Boosting brain power, fighting obesity. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48, 62–66.
Rideout, V., Foehr, U., & Roberts, D. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8 to 18-year-olds. Kaiser Family Foundation Study. http://www.kff.org/entmedia/8010.
Rollo, S., Smith, S., & Prapavessis, H. (2017). Do you want your students to pay more attention in class? Try dynamic seating! Journal of Ergonomics, 7, 217–220. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7556.1000217.
Rollo, S., Crutchlow, L., Nagpal, T., Sui, W., & Prapavessis, H. (2018). The effects of classroom-based dynamic seating interventions on academic outcomes in youth: A systematic review. Learning Environments Research, 22, 153–172.
Schilling, D. L., & Schwartz, L. (2004). Alternative seating for young children with autism spectrum disorder: Effects on classroom behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 423–432.
Schilling, D. L., Washington, K., Billingsley, F. F., & Deitz, J. (2003). Classroom seating for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Therapy balls versus chairs. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 534–541.
Schmidt, M., Benzing, V., & Kamer, M. (2016). Classroom-based physical activity breaks and children’s attention: Cognitive engagement works! Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1474.
Torsten-Hothorn, H. K., Van de Wiel, M., & Zeileis, A. (2008). Implementing a class of permutation tests: The coin package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28, 1–23.
Tremblay, M. S., LeBlanc, A. G., Kho, M. E., Saunders, T. J., Larouche, R., Colley, R. C., et al. (2011). Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 98.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance Atlanta. GA: Author.
Van der Niet, A. G., Smith, J., Scherder, E. J. A., Oosterlaan, J., Hartman, E., & Visscher, C. (2015). Associations between daily physical activity and executive functioning in primary school-aged children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 18, 673–677.
Acknowledgements
We thank Cassidy Cabral, Kara Penney and the participating teachers, students and administrators for their support of this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical standard
All procedures involving human participants were completed in accordance with the ethical standards of the URI Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flippin, M., Clapham, E.D. & Tutwiler, M.S. Effects of using a variety of kinesthetic classroom equipment on elementary students’ on-task behaviour: a pilot study. Learning Environ Res 24, 137–151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09321-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09321-2