Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of using a variety of kinesthetic classroom equipment on elementary students’ on-task behaviour: a pilot study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability for students to maintain attention to classroom instruction is a critical factor for learning because loss of instructional time due to off-task behaviour has negative impacts on academic achievement. Early studies suggest that use of kinesthetic equipment in place of traditional seating in classrooms can improve student on-task behaviour. To date, however, limitations of the kinesthetic classroom research literature include small sample sizes, often without controls, use of a single equipment type (e.g. standing desks or exercise balls) and lack of objective measures of student on-task behaviour. We report a pilot study of the impact of using a variety of kinesthetic equipment in elementary classrooms on objectively-measured student on-task behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez-Bueno, C., Pesce, I., Cavero-Redondo, M., Sanchez-Lopez, M., Garrido-Miguel, V., & Martinez-Vizcaino, (2017). Academic achievement and physical activity: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 140, e20171498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. S. (2007). Modeling and understanding students’ off- task behaviour in intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2007: Computer–human interaction (pp. 1059–1068).

  • Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Herson, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, J. B., & Jowers, E. M. (2011). Physically active academic lessons in elementary children. Preventative Medicine, 52, S51–S54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benes, S., Finn, K. E., Sullivan, E. C., & Yan, Z. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of using movement in the classroom. Physical Educator, 73, 110–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, L., & Bohlin, G. (2002). Response inhibition, hyperactivity, and conduct problems among preschool children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 242–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, C., & Diamond, A. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: The promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 899–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. L., Tomporowski, P. D., McDowell, J. E., Austin, B. P., Miller, P. H., Yanasak, N. E., Allison, J. D., & Naglieri, J. A. (2011). Exercise improves executive function and achievement and alters brain activation in overweight children: A randomized controlled trial. Health psychology, 30(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhecker, M., Blake, J., Benden, M., Zhao, H., & Wendel, M. (2015). The effect of stand-biased desks on academic engagement: An exploratory study. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 53, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2004). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms (6th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, M. D. (2004). Permutation methods: A basis for exact inference. Statistical Science, 19, 676–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, H., Able, M. G., Beighle, A., & Beets, M. W. (2009). Promoting children’s health through psychically active math classes: A pilot study. Health Promotion and Practice, 12, 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, H. E., Fedewa, A., Ahn, S., & Thornton, M. (2016). Elementary students’ physical activity levels and behavior when using stability balls. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(2), 700220010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedewa, A., Davis, M. A., & Ahn, S. (2015). Effects of stability balls on children’s on-task behavior, academic achievement, and discipline referrals: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(2), 6902220020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedewa, A. L., & Erwin, H. E. (2011). Stability balls and students with attention and hyperactivity concerns: Implications for on-task and in-seat behavior. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 393–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, A., Moore, S., & Butler, L. (2016). Sitting on a stability ball improves attention span and reduces anxious/depressive symptomatology among grade 2 students: A prospective case-control field experiment. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibbe, D. L., Hackett, J., Hurley, M., McFarland, A., Schubert, K. G., Schultz, A., et al. (2011). Ten years of take 10! Integrating physical activity with academic concepts in elementary classrooms. Preventative Medicine, 52, S43–S50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koepp, G. A., Sneeden, B. J., Flynn, L., Puccinelli, D., Hunstman, B., & Levine, J. A. (2012). Feasibility analysis of standing desks for sixth graders. Infant, Child & Adolescent Nutrition, 4, 89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. W., Kelly, K. E., & Nyre, J. E. (1999). Preliminary report on the relation of students’ on-task behavior with completion of school work. Psychological Reports, 84, 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, R. K., Shortz, A. E., & Benden, M. E. (2015). Stand-biased up for learning: A pilot investigation on the neurocognitive benefits of stand-biased school desks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(1), 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minges, K. E., Chao, A. M., Irwin, M. L., Owen, N., Park, C., Whittemore, R., et al. (2016). Classroom stand-biased desks and sedentary behavior: A systematic review. Pediatrics, 137, e20153087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. (1979). Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 376–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. A., Pate, R. R., Dowda, M., Mattocks, C., Riddoch, C., Ness, A. R., et al. (2012). A prospective study of sedentary behavior in a large cohort of youth. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 44, 1081–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullender-Wijnsma, M. J., Harman, E., de Greef, J. W., Doolaard, S., Bosker, R. J., & Visscher, C. (2016). Physically active math and language lessons improve academic achievement: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 137, e20152743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulrine, C. F., Prater, M. A., & Jenkins, A. (2008). The active classroom: Supporting students with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder through exercise. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R. S. J. D., & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2012). BakerRodrigo Observation Method Protocol (BROMP) 1.0. Training Manual version 1.0 (Technical report). Manila: Ateneo Laboratory for the Learning Sciences.

  • Posner, M. I., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (1998). Executive attention: Conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 401–423). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, E., Buskist, C., & Gross, M. K. (2012). Movement in the classroom: Boosting brain power, fighting obesity. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48, 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V., Foehr, U., & Roberts, D. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8 to 18-year-olds. Kaiser Family Foundation Study. http://www.kff.org/entmedia/8010.

  • Rollo, S., Smith, S., & Prapavessis, H. (2017). Do you want your students to pay more attention in class? Try dynamic seating! Journal of Ergonomics, 7, 217–220. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7556.1000217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollo, S., Crutchlow, L., Nagpal, T., Sui, W., & Prapavessis, H. (2018). The effects of classroom-based dynamic seating interventions on academic outcomes in youth: A systematic review. Learning Environments Research, 22, 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, D. L., & Schwartz, L. (2004). Alternative seating for young children with autism spectrum disorder: Effects on classroom behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 423–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, D. L., Washington, K., Billingsley, F. F., & Deitz, J. (2003). Classroom seating for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Therapy balls versus chairs. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 534–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M., Benzing, V., & Kamer, M. (2016). Classroom-based physical activity breaks and children’s attention: Cognitive engagement works! Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torsten-Hothorn, H. K., Van de Wiel, M., & Zeileis, A. (2008). Implementing a class of permutation tests: The coin package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M. S., LeBlanc, A. G., Kho, M. E., Saunders, T. J., Larouche, R., Colley, R. C., et al. (2011). Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance Atlanta. GA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Niet, A. G., Smith, J., Scherder, E. J. A., Oosterlaan, J., Hartman, E., & Visscher, C. (2015). Associations between daily physical activity and executive functioning in primary school-aged children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 18, 673–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Cassidy Cabral, Kara Penney and the participating teachers, students and administrators for their support of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Flippin.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standard

All procedures involving human participants were completed in accordance with the ethical standards of the URI Institutional Review Board.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flippin, M., Clapham, E.D. & Tutwiler, M.S. Effects of using a variety of kinesthetic classroom equipment on elementary students’ on-task behaviour: a pilot study. Learning Environ Res 24, 137–151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09321-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09321-2

Keywords

Navigation