What you do is less important than how you do it: the effects of learning environment on student outcomes
- 126 Downloads
Higher education has seen a shift towards promoting student-centred learning. There has also been a push for identifying the ‘best’ teaching models and an insistence that instructors use these models, despite mixed results regarding their effectiveness. In the current paper, we compare the effects of an autonomy-supportive learning environment on student learning and achievement with those of the specific course features of contact hours and active learning. In a large-scale comprehensive survey with over 14,000 responses from students enrolled in courses constituting various disciplines, course levels and instructors, data across all student outcome variables suggested that those in highly autonomy-supportive learning environments experienced significant increases in satisfaction of students’ basic psychological needs, student motivation, course evaluations and academic performance. These results suggest that what is most important for students is not the specific techniques used by instructors but the quality of student–instructor interactions.
KeywordsActive learning Contact hours Learning environment Self-determination theory Student motivation
- Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher education.Google Scholar
- Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Gundlach, E., Richards, K. A. R., Nelson, D., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2015). A comparison of student attitudes, statistical reasoning, performance, and perceptions for web-augmented traditional, fully online, and flipped sections of a statistical literacy class. Journal of Statistics Education, 23(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IBM Cognos Analytics. (2005). Armonk, NY: IBM. Software available at: https://www.ibm.com/products/cognos-analytics. Accessed June 2015.
- Levesque-Bristol, C., Richards, K. A. R., Zissimopoulos, K., Wang, C., & Yu, S. (2019). Applying self-determination theory to the college classroom: A test of the integrative model for learning and motivation. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Serwetnyk, T., Filmore, K., VonBacho, S., & Smith, C. M. (2013). Online basic life support courses gain efficiencies while maintaining quality training outcomes for registered professional nurses in a large academic medical center. Circulation, 128(Suppl 22), A10178–A10178.Google Scholar
- Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Smith, C. V., & Cardaciotto, L. (2012). Is active learning like broccoli? Student perceptions of active learning in large lecture classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 53–61.Google Scholar
- Twigg, C. A. (2003). New models for online learning: Improving learning and reducing costs. Educause Review, 38(5), 28–38.Google Scholar