The effects of classroom-based dynamic seating interventions on academic outcomes in youth: a systematic review
- 11 Downloads
The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise and evaluate the literature on the effects of classroom-based dynamic seating interventions on academic-related outcomes, among school-aged children and adolescents. A secondary aim was to examine the effects of interventions on students’ sedentary behaviour and physical activity levels. In September 2017, four electronic databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science) were searched and a total of 5138 titles and abstracts were reviewed. Studies that examined associations between a classroom-based dynamic seating intervention and at least one academic-related outcome in school-aged children or adolescents were included. A best-evidence synthesis and narrative approach was implemented to synthesise the evidence. Thirteen studies published between 2003 and 2017 were identified that met the inclusion criteria for the review. There is some evidence that classroom-based dynamic seating interventions could have positive effects on the in-seat behaviour, academic engagement and attention of school aged-children and adolescents, predominantly those with attention difficulties. It is currently unclear whether dynamic seating has positive effects on students’ on-task behaviour, disruptive behaviour, memory, concentration or academic achievement. No intervention was found to have a detrimental effect on academic-related outcomes. The findings come from low-quality to moderate-quality studies (M = 60.62%; SD = 10.44). Classroom-based dynamic seating could be a simple, effective health strategy to reduce students’ static sitting time without compromising student learning and academic performance. The current interventions need to be replicated with larger, adequately-powered RCT designs, valid and reliable outcome measures, and assessment of intervention fidelity.
KeywordsAcademic achievement Classroom Classroom behaviour Cognitive performance Dynamic seating Intervention Sedentary behaviour Youth
SR conceived the study. SR, LC, TN and HP contributed to the final design of the review. SR, LC and TN executed the study. SR, LC and TN extracted study data of the included studies. All authors had full access to all of the data (including findings and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. SR, LC and TN prepared the first draft of the manuscript that was jointly interpreted and edited by the other authors (HP and WS). All listed authors contributed to and approved the final version of the manuscript. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42017077658.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bagatell, N., Mirigliani, G., Patterson, C., Reyes, Y., & Test, L. (2010). Effectiveness of therapy ball chairs on classroom participation in children with autism spectrum disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(6), 895–903. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2010.09149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Case-Smith, J., & O’Brien, J. C. (2014). Occupational therapy for children and adolescents: e-book. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences.Google Scholar
- Diaz, K. M., Howard, V. J., Hutto, B., Colabianchi, N., Vena, J. E., Safford, M. M., et al. (2017). Patterns of sedentary behavior and mortality in US Middle-aged and older adults: A national cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 167(7), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-0212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52(6), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.52.6.377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2004). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Erwin, H., Fedewa, A., Beighle, A., & Ahn, S. (2012). A quantitative review of physical activity, health, and learning outcomes associated with classroom-based physical activity interventions. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2012.643755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fedewa, A., Davis, M. A., & Ahn, S. (2015). Effects of stability balls on children’s on-task behavior, academic achievement, and discipline referrals: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(2), 6902220020p1–6902220020p9. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.014829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gaston, A., Moore, S., & Butler, L. (2016). Sitting on a stability ball improves attention span and reduces anxious/depressive symptomatology among grade 2 students: A prospective case-control field experiment. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lange, M.L. (2000). Dynamic seating. OT Practice, 5, 21–22.Google Scholar
- McMullen, J., Kulinna, P., & Cothran, D. (2014). Chapter 5 physical activity opportunities during the school day: Classroom teachers’ perceptions of using activity breaks in the classroom. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33(4), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2014-0062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Open Medicine, 3(3), 123–130.Google Scholar
- Norris, E., Shelton, N., Dunsmuir, S., Duke-Williams, O., & Stamatakis, E. (2015). Physically active lessons as physical activity and educational interventions: a systematic review of methods and results. Preventive Medicine, 72, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schilling, D. L., & Schwartz, I. S. (2004). Alternative seating for young children with autism spectrum disorder: Effects on classroom behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(4), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000037418.48587.f4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Statistics Canada. (2017). Directly measured physical activity of children and youth, 2012 and 2013. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-625-x/2015001/article/14136-eng.htm. Accessed 31 Oct 2017.
- Teach in Ontario. (2017). Ontario school’s system: School year. https://www.teachinontario.ca/tio/en/schoolyear.htm.
- Torbeyns, T., de Geus, B., Bailey, S., Decroix, L., Van Cutsem, J., De Pauw, K., et al. (2017). Bike desks in the classroom: Energy expenditure, physical health, cognitive performance, brain functioning and academic performance. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2016-0224.Google Scholar
- Tremblay, M. S., Aubert, S., Barnes, J. D., Saunders, T. J., Carson, V., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., et al. (2017). Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN)–Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tremblay, M. S., LeBlanc, A. G., Kho, M. E., Saunders, T. J., Larouche, R., Colley, R. C., et al. (2011). Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(1), 98–119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watson, A., Timperio, A., Brown, H., Best, K., & Hesketh, K. D. (2017). Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical activity outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0569-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar