Learning Environments Research

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 181–202 | Cite as

Self-report measures of the home learning environment in large scale research: Measurement properties and associations with key developmental outcomes

  • Frank Niklas
  • Cuc Nguyen
  • Daniel S. Cloney
  • Collette Tayler
  • Raymond Adams
Original Paper

Abstract

Favourable home learning environments (HLEs) support children’s literacy, numeracy and social development. In large-scale research, HLE is typically measured by self-report survey, but there is little consistency between studies and many different items and latent constructs are observed. Little is known about the stability of these items and constructs over time when used in either longitudinal research or studies with children with a wide range of ages. A review of the literature shows commonalities and differences between approaches in research on HLE. When we tested the psychometric properties of a short-form measure of HLE with a Rasch item-response-model using longitudinal data from over 1600 Australian families, there was support for two dimensions of HLE—formal and informal learning frequency. We found that this measure was stable over the transitional period from pre-K to school as well as between gender and family language background. There were small but significant associations between the HLE measures and cognitive and behavioural developmental outcomes. We recommend that other measures of HLE could be similarly validated to assess their suitability for use in longitudinal research on learning environments. Recommendations are made for the future development of measures of broader constructs of the HLE.

Keywords

Australian E4Kids study Home learning environment (HLE) Preschool children Rasch item-response-model Short-form measures Testing of invariance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

E4Kids is a project of the Melbourne Graduate School of Education at The University of Melbourne and is conducted in partnership with Queensland University of Technology. E4Kids is funded by the Australian Research Council Linkage Projects Scheme (LP0990200), the Victorian Government Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, and the Queensland Government Department of Education and Training. E4Kids is conducted in academic collaboration with the University of Toronto Scarborough, the Institute of Education at the University of London and the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne. The E4Kids team would like to sincerely thank the ECEC services, directors, teachers/staff, children and their families for their ongoing participation in this study. This work was supported by a fellowship within the Postdoctoral Program of the German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD).

References

  1. Aikens, N. L., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anders, Y., Rossbach, H.-G., Weinert, S., Ebert, S., Kuger, S., Lehrl, S., & von Maurice, J. (2012). Home and preschool learning environments and their relations to the development of early numeracy skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, R. H., Caldwell, B. M., Rock, S. L., Hamrick, H. M., & Harris, P. T. (1988). Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment: Development of a home inventory for use with families having children 6 to 10 years old. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, R. H., Rock, S. L., Caldwell, B. M., Harris, P. T., & Hamrick, H. M. (1987). Home environment and school performance among Black elementary school children. Journal of Negro Education, 56, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess, S. R. (2002). The influence of speech perception, oral language ability, the home literacy environment, and pre-reading knowledge on the growth of phonological sensitivity: A one-year longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 15, 709–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgess, S. R., Hecht, S. A., & Lonigan, C. J. (2002). Relations of the home literacy environment (HLE) to the development of reading-related abilities: A one-year longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(4), 408–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bus, A. G., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavanagh, R. F., & Romanoski, J. T. (2006). Rating scale instruments and measurement. Learning Environments Research, 9, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chase-Lansdale, P. L., Mott, F. L., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Phillips, D. A. (1991). Children of the national longitudinal survey of youth: A unique research opportunity. Special section: Secondary data analyses in developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 27(6), 918–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, E. A. (2014). Optimising the education and care experiences of children with “difficult temperament”. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  11. Gershoff, E. T., Aber, J. L., Raver, C. C., & Lennon, M. C. (2007). Income is not enough: Incorporating material hardship into models of income associations with parenting and child development. Child Development, 78(1), 70–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodman, R. (1997). The strength and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hood, M., Conlon, E., & Andrews, G. (2008). Preschool home literacy practices and children’s literacy development: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howell, S. C., & Kemp, C. R. (2010). Assessing preschool number sense: Skills demonstrated by children prior to school entry. Educational Psychology, 30(4), 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. LeFevre, J.-A., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Smith-Chant, B. L., Fast, L., Kamawar, D., & Bisanz, J. (2009). Home numeracy experiences and children’s math performance in the early school years. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(2), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leventhal, T., Martin, A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2004). The EC-HOME across five national data sets in the 3rd to 5th year of life. Parenting: Science and Practice, 4(2/3), 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Linver, M. R., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Cabrera, N. (2004). The home observation for measurement of the environment (HOME) inventory: The derivation of conceptually designed subscales. Parenting: Science and Practice, 4(2/3), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lonigan, C. J. (1994). Reading to preschoolers exposed: Is the emperor really naked? Developmental Review, 14, 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manolitsis, G., Georgiou, G. K., & Tziraki, N. (2013). Examining the effects of home literacy and numeracy environment on early reading and math acquisition. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 692–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marjoribanks, K. (2003). Learning environments, family contexts, educational aspirations and attainment: A moderation-mediation model extended. Learning Environments Research, 6, 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III tests of achievement. Examiner’s manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Melhuish, E. C., Phan, M. B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool centre experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nguyen, T. K. C., & Griffin, P. (2013). Developing of two instruments to measure attitudes of Vietnamese parents and students toward schooling. Journal of Applied Measurement, 14(3), 282–298.Google Scholar
  25. Niklas, F. (2015). Die familiäre Lernumwelt und ihre Bedeutung für die kindliche Kompetenzentwicklung (The learning environment provided by the family and its impact on the development of child competencies). Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 62, 106–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niklas, F., Cohrssen, C., & Tayler, C. (in press). Improving preschoolers’ numerical abilities by enhancing the home numeracy environment. Early Education and Development. doi:10.1080/10409289.2015.1076676 
  27. Niklas, F., Cohrssen, C., & Tayler, C. (in press). Home learning environment and concept formation: A family intervention study with kindergarten children. Early Childhood Education Journal. doi:10.1007/s10643-015-0726-1.
  28. Niklas, F., Möllers, K., & Schneider, W. (2013). Die frühe familiäre Lernumwelt als Mediator zwischen strukturellen Herkunftsmerkmalen und der basalen Lesefähigkeit am Ende der ersten Klasse (The early learning environment provided by the family as a mediator between structural family background and basic reading abilities at the end of Grade 1). Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 60(2), 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Niklas, F., & Schneider, W. (2010). Der Zusammenhang von familiärer Lernumwelt mit schulrelevanten Kompetenzen im Vorschulalter (The interrelation of Home Literacy Environment and different measures of performance at preschool age). Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 30(2), 148–164.Google Scholar
  30. Niklas, F., & Schneider, W. (2013). Home literacy environment and the beginning of reading and spelling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niklas, F., & Schneider, W. (2014). Casting the die before the die is cast: The importance of the home numeracy environment for preschool children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(3), 327–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Niklas, F., & Schneider, W. (2015b). With a little help: Improving kindergarten children’s vocabulary by enhancing the home literacy environment. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(4), 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Niklas, F., Tayler, C., & Schneider, W. (in press). Home-based literacy activities and children’s cognitive outcomes: A comparison between Australia and Germany. International Journal of Educational Research, 71, 75–85.Google Scholar
  34. Rashid, F. L., Morris, R. D., & Sevcik, R. A. (2005). Relationship between home literacy environment and reading achievement in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raver, C. C., Gershoff, E. T., & Aber, J. L. (2007). Testing equivalence of mediating models of income, parenting, and school readiness for white, black, and hispanic children in a national sample. Child Development, 78(1), 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roberts, J., Jurgens, J., & Burchinal, M. (2005). The role of home literacy practices in preschool children’s language and emergent literacy skills. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodriguez, E. T., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2011). Trajectories of the home learning environment across the first 5 years: Associations with children’s vocabulary and literacy skills at prekindergarten. Child Development, 82(4), 1058–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmiedeler, S., Niklas, F., & Schneider, W. (2014). Symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and home learning environment (HLE): Findings from a longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(3), 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. (2012). The Cattell–Horn–Carroll model of intelligence. In D. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sénéchal, M., & Young, L. (2008). The effect of family literacy interventions on children’s acquisition of reading from kindergarten to grade 3: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 880–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sheldon, S., & Epstein, J. (2005). Involvement counts: Family and community partnerships and mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(4), 196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skwarchuk, S.-L., Sowinski, C., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2014). Formal and informal home learning activities in relation to children’s early numeracy and literacy skills: The development of a home numeracy model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 121, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Son, S.-H., & Morrison, F. J. (2010). The nature and impact of changes in home learning environment on development of language and academic skills in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1103–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2008). Effective pre-school and primary education 3-11 project (EPPE 3-11): Final report from the primary phase: Pre-school, school and family influences on children’s development during Key Stage 2 (age 7–11). London: University of London.Google Scholar
  46. Tandon, P. S., Zhou, C., Lozano, P., & Christakis, D. A. (2011). Preschoolers’ total daily screen time at home and by type of child care. Journal of Pediatrics, 158, 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tayler, C., Cloney, D., & Niklas, F. (2015). A bird in the hand: understanding the trajectories of development of young children and the need for action to improve outcomes. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(3), 51–60.Google Scholar
  48. Tayler, C., Ishimine, K., Cloney, D., Cleveland, G., & Thorpe, K. (2013). The quality of early childhood education and care services in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(2), 13–21.Google Scholar
  49. Totsika, V., & Sylva, K. (2004). The home observation for measurement of the environment revisited. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 9(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Steensel, R., McElvany, N., Kurvers, J., & Herppich, S. (2011). How effective are family literacy programs? Results of a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E., & Mislevy, R. J. (2009). What are plausible values and why are they useful? (IERI Monograph Series). Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessments, 2, 9–36.Google Scholar
  52. Waugh, R. F., & Cavanagh, R. F. (2002). Measuring parent receptivity towards the classroom environment using a Rasch measurement model. Learning Environments Research, 5(3), 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., Wilson, M. R., & Haldane, S. A. (2007). ACER ConQuest Version 2: Generalised item response modelling software. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  55. Zwick, R., Thayer, D. T., & Lewis, C. (1999). An empirical Bayes approach to Mantel–Haenszel DIF analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.The Australian Council for Educational ResearchCamberwellAustralia

Personalised recommendations