Student perceptions of personalised learning: development and validation of a questionnaire with regional secondary students
- 1.2k Downloads
This project sought to evaluate regional students’ perceptions of their readiness to learn, assessment processes, engagement, extent to which their learning is personalised and to relate these to academic efficacy, academic achievement, and student well-being. It also examined teachers’ perceptions of students’ readiness to learn, the assessment process, engagement, and the extent to which students’ learning is personalised. The sample involved students in years 7–10 from six Victorian secondary schools. An instrument Personalised Learning Environment Questionnaire (PLQ) was developed to measure students’ perceptions of the factors effecting the implementation of Personalised Learning Plans (PLPs). It employed the latest scales to assess a range of PLP indicator variables, with all scales modified for use in an Australian context, and the total number of items kept to a minimum. Only scales more sensitive to PLPs were used to minimise the length of the instrument. There were three outcome variables: academic efficacy, academic achievement, and student well-being. The PLPs were assessed through scales that assess several contributing, distinct dimensions: selfdirected learning readiness, personal achievement, goal orientation, learning environment, personalised teaching and learning initiatives, curriculum entitlement and choice, and perceptions of assessment for learning. The trail PLQ was administered to 220 students, resulting in a 19 scale questionnaire with three or four items per scale. This paper reveals good data to model fit for the majority of items and each scale had good reliability. The paper describes the analytic techniques and results, how the instrument was refined and identifies common and uncommon student perceptions based on a post hoc analysis. The main study consisted of 2,407 students from four schools in the Bendigo Education Plan. They responded to this refined 19 scale version of the PLQ that was developed from the trial PLQ. All scales had satisfactory internal consistency reliability.
KeywordsLearning plans Perceptions Personalised learning Questionnaire development Regional students
The research described in this paper was supported in part by an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant LP100200179 called Improving Regional Learning.
- Aelterman, A. N., Engels, J.P., Verhaeghe, K., Panagiotou, H. S., & Van Petegem, K. (2002). Het welbevinden van de leerkracht (OBPWO project, Gent).Google Scholar
- Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2011). National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) national report. Sydney: ACARA. Accessed Jan 18, 2012 http://www.nap.edu.au/Test_Results/National_reports/index.html.
- Bendigo Education Plan (2005). Loddon Mallee Region, Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.Google Scholar
- Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education (Final report). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
- Creemers, B., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice, and theory in contemporary schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2008). Personalised learning—A practical guide. Accessed June 18, 2011. http://www.canterbury.ac.uk/education/tf-mentors/ActivitiesforMentoring/Personalised/PracticalGuide.aspx.
- Department for Education. (2006). 2020 vision: Report of the teaching and learning in 2020 review group. Date accessed 20/10/10. http://publications.education.gov.uk/default.aspx?PageFunction=productdetails&PageMode=publications&ProductId=DFES-04255-2006& (accessed 20 October 2011).
- Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2004) A national conversation about personalised learning. Nottingham: DfES. https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DfES%200919%20200MIG186.pdf (accessed 11 September 2011).
- Duckworth, K., Akerman, R., MacGregor, A., Salter, E., & Vorhaus, J. (2009). Self regulated learning: A literature review (London, Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of Learning). OECD/CERI, 83–100. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Edwards, A. (2007). Relational agency in professional practice: A CHAT analysis. An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Engels, N., Aelterman, A., Deconinck, E., Schepens, A., & Van Petegem, K. (2000). Het wel-bevinden in de schoolsituatie bij leerlingen secundair onderwijs (OBPWO project, Gent).Google Scholar
- Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
- Fraser, B. J. (1990). Individualised Classroom Environment Questionnaire. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom learning environments. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 103–124). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gilbert. C., August., K., Brooks, D., Hargreaves, D., Pearce, N., Roberts, J., Rose, J., & Wise, D. (2006). 2020 vision: Report of the teaching and learning in 2020 review group. Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
- Gonida, E. N., Kiosseoglou, G., & Voulala, K. A. (2007). Perceptions of parent goals and their contribution to student achievement goal orientation and engagement in the classroom: Grade-level differences across adolescence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keeffe, M., & Tadich, B. (2009). Curriculum transitions in the Bendigo Education Plan. Bendigo: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.Google Scholar
- Leadbeater, C. (2003). Personalisation through participation. London: Demos.Google Scholar
- Leadbetter, C. (2005) The shape of things to come: Personalised learning through collaboration. Available online at: http://www.innovationunit.org/sites/default/files/The%20shape%20of%20things%20to%20come.pdf (accessed 7 December 2011).
- Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science ICT and mathematics education in rural and regional Australia (The SiMERR national survey). Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
- Masters, G. N. (2009). A shared challenge: Improving literacy, numeracy and science learning in Queensland primary schools. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- McMahon, T. (2010). Combining peer-assessment with negotiated learning activities on a day-release undergraduate-level certificate course (ECTS level 3). Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 223–239.Google Scholar
- Meyer, B., Haywood, N., Sachdev, D., & Faraday, S. (2008). Independent learning: Literature review (Research Report 051). London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.Google Scholar
- Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Onyx, J., Wood, C., Bullen, P., & Osburn, L. (2005). Social capital: A rural youth perspective. Youth Studies Australia, 24(4), 21–27.Google Scholar
- Parliamentary Library Paper. (2009). Poverty rates by electoral divisions, 2006. Department of Parliamentary Services.Google Scholar
- Pykett, J. (2010). Personalised governing through behaviour change and re-education. PSA Conference Paper, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
- Sebba, J., Brown, N., Steward, S., Galton, M., & James, M. (2007). An investigation of personalised learning approaches used in schools. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
- Taylor, J., & Nelms, L. (2008). Life chances at 16: Life stage study stage 8. Melbourne: Brotherhood of St. Laurence.Google Scholar
- Thomson, S., & De Bortoli, L. (2008). Exploring scientific literacy: How Australia measures up. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2009). Challenges for Australian education: Results from PISA 2009. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1987). Manual for the Rochester assessment package for schools. Rochester: University of Rochester.Google Scholar