Learning Environments Research

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 217–229 | Cite as

Motivational goal orientation, perceptions of biology and physics classroom learning environments, and gender

  • Ravinder Koul
  • Laura Roy
  • Thanita Lerdpornkulrat
Original Paper


Researchers have reported persuasive evidence that students’ perceptions of their classroom learning environment account for significant variance in cognitive and affective outcomes (e.g. intrinsic motivation, self-concept, liking for particular subjects and students’ intention to drop out). The study reported in this paper investigated the relationship between students’ perceptions of classroom learning environment and motivational achievement goal orientations towards biology and physics, as well as the influence of gender. Participants (N = 1538) were high school science students from the north-eastern region of Thailand. Our results suggest that motivational goals are linked to differences in students’ perceptions of learning environment and levels of biology and physics classroom anxiety. We found that females adopted significantly higher levels of mastery and performance approach goals towards biology, while males adopted significantly higher levels of mastery and performance approach goals towards physics. Males adopted significantly higher levels of performance avoidance goals towards both biology and physics. Positive associations emerged between gender and the adoption of specific performance goals, perceived degree of competition in biology and physics classrooms, and levels of biology and physics classroom anxiety. These results suggest that motivational goal orientations and perceptions of learning environment are gender-dependent and domain-specific for the two science content areas.


Achievement goal orientation Classroom anxiety Classroom learning environment High school students Motivation Science learning Thailand 



Special thanks to Barbara E. Coon for her help and critical feedback. We are also grateful to the administrators and teachers of Nongkhai and Udon Thani secondary schools for their assistance with data collection.


  1. Aida, Y. (1994). Examination of Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope’s construct of foreign language anxiety: The case of students of Japanese. Modern Language Journal, 78, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1043–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivational processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, A., Hamilton, R. J., & Hattie, J. (2004). Classroom climate and motivated behaviour in secondary schools. Learning Environments Research, 7, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arch, E. (1993). Risk-taking: A motivational basis for sex differences. Psychological Reports, 73(3), 6–11.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Behling, O., & Law, S. K. (2000). Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, D. B., Hattie, J. A., & Fraser, B. J. (1986). Student perceptions of preferred classroom learning environment. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 10–18.Google Scholar
  9. Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Correll, J. S. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biases self-assessments. The American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1697–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dart, B., Burnett, P., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., Smith, D., & McCrindle, A. (1999). Classroom learning environments and students approaches to learning. Learning Environments Research, 2, 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Fouts, J. T., & Myers, R. E. (1992). Classroom environments and middle school students’ views of science. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 356–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1986). Predicting students’ outcomes from their perceptions of classroom psycho social environment. American Educational Research, 19, 498–518.Google Scholar
  18. Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1049–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hyde, S. J., & Durik, M. A. (2005). Gender, competence, and motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Competence and motivation (pp. 375–391). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Koul, R., Roy, L., Kaewkuekool, S., & Ploisawaschai, S. (2009). Multiple goal orientations and foreign language anxiety. System, 37, 676–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levy, J., den Brok, P., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2003). Students’ perceptions of the interpersonal aspect of the learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 6, 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 197–213.Google Scholar
  23. McRobbie, C., & Tobin, K. (1997). A social constructivist perspective on learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murayama, K., & Elliot, J. A. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychological, 88, 408–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Tapola, A., & Niemivirta, M. (2008). The role of achievement goal orientations in students’ perceptions of and preferences for classroom environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Terwel, J., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., & van den Eeden, P. (1994). Gender differences in perceptions of the learning environment in physics and mathematics eduation. In D. Fisher (Ed.), The study of learning environments (Vol. 8, pp. 39–51). Perth, Australia: Curtin University of Technology.Google Scholar
  29. Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Udo, K. M., Ramsey, P. G., Reynolds-Alpert, S., & Mallow, V. J. (2001). Does physics teaching affect gender-based science anxiety. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Urdan, T. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1998). Classroom learning environments in urban elementary, middle, and high schools. Learning Environments Research: An International Journal, 1, 95–113.Google Scholar
  33. Wentzel, K. R. (2000). What is it that I’m trying to achieve? Classroom goals from a content perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes, and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wong, A. L. F., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ravinder Koul
    • 1
  • Laura Roy
    • 1
  • Thanita Lerdpornkulrat
    • 2
  1. 1.Penn State University—Great ValleyMalvernUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology ThonburiKing Mongkut’s University of TechnologyBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations