Learning Environments Research

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 131–142

Measuring language learning environments in secondary science classrooms

Original Paper

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore a new learning environment instrument which could be used by teaching practitioners and other educators to measure the language learning environment in the secondary science classroom. The science teacher is central in creating science classrooms conductive to the language needs of students and should be promoting the learning of language in the science curriculum and in the teaching strategies with English as second language learners. The data in this study were collected using a structured self-administered survey with a sample of 240 secondary school students from eight science classrooms. Factor analysis identified five dimensions, namely, Teacher Support, Vocabulary Development, Assessment, Motivation and Language for Learning Science. These five dimensions explained 56.9% of the variance in the language learning environment instrument. The internal reliability of the dimensions using Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.603 to 0.830. The study revealed significant differences in the dimensions of the language learning environment between what the students perceived to actually be occurring to what they would prefer. Implications from this preliminary research include the ability for measuring the language learning environment in the secondary science class and the potential for practitioners to use the information to develop teaching strategies conducive to learning for all students.

Keywords

Language Learning environment Secondary school Science education 

References

  1. Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. The British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77–85.Google Scholar
  2. Buck, G., Mast, C., Ehlers, N., & Franklin, E. (2005). Preparing teachers to create mainstream science classroom conductive to the needs of English language learners: A feminist action research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 1013–1031. doi:10.1002/tea.20085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Claire, E., & Haynes, J. (1994). Classroom teacher’s ESL Survival Kit 1. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  6. Facella, M. A., Rampino, K. M., & Shea, E. K. (2005). Effective teaching strategies for bilingual learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 209–220.Google Scholar
  7. Fradd, S., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers’ roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28, 14–20.Google Scholar
  8. Franklin, E., & Buck, G. (2002, April). Learning the language of science: A case study of second language learners in a science classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  9. Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Antecedents, consequences and evaluation (pp. 3–27). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  10. Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493–541). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Fraser, B. J. (1998a). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33. doi:10.1023/A:1009932514731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraser, B. J. (1998b). Science learning environments: Assessments effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  13. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 10.0 update (3rd ed.). Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  14. Gorsuch, R. L. (1883). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Krashen, S. D., & Terrel, D. T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  16. Laplante, B. (1997). Teachers’ beliefs and instructional strategies in science: Pushing analysis further. Science Education, 81, 277–294. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199706)81:3<277::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language learning and values. Norward, NJ: Albex.Google Scholar
  18. Lim, H. L., & Watson, D. (1993). Whole language content classes for second language learners. The Reading Teacher, 46, 384–393.Google Scholar
  19. Logan, K. A., Crump, B. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2006). Measuring the computer classroom environment: Lessons learned from using a new instrument. Learning Environments Research, 9, 67–93. doi:10.1007/s10984-005-9004-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K., & Kong, C. (2000). Late immersion and language of instruction in Hong Kong high schools: Achievement growth in language and non-language subjects. Harvard Educational Review, 70, 203–346.Google Scholar
  21. Moos, R. H. (1973). Conceptualisations of human environments. The American Psychologist, 28, 652–665. doi:10.1037/h0035722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Nunnally, T. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  25. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.Google Scholar
  26. Rice, D. C., Pappmihiel, N. W., & Lake, V. E. (2004). Lesson adaptations and accommodations: Working with native speakers and English language learners in the same science classroom. Childhood Education, 80, 121–127.Google Scholar
  27. Short, D. J. (2000). The ESL standards: Bridging the academic gap for English language learners. ERIC Digest. ED447728, Washington, DC: ERIC Digest.Google Scholar
  28. Sleeter, C. (2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools: Research and the overwhelming presence of whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 94–106. doi:10.1177/0022487101052002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sutman, F., Guzman, A., & Schwartz, W. (1993). Teaching science effectively to limited English proficient students. ERIC/CUE Digest, 87.Google Scholar
  30. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). Northridge, CA: Harper Collins College Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, P., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walberg, H., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419. doi:10.1037/h0026490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watson, S. (2004). Opening the science doorway. Science Teacher, 71(2), 32–35.Google Scholar
  34. Webster, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (2000). Accounting for variation in science and mathematics achievement: A multilevel analysis of Australian data. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 339–360. doi:10.1076/0924-3453(200009)11:3;1-G;FT339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Webster, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (2003). School-level environment and student outcomes in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 6, 309–326. doi:10.1023/A:1027383925394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yip, D. Y., Tsang, W. K., & Cheung, S. P. (2003). Evaluation of the effects of medium of instruction on the science learning of Hong Kong students: Performance on science achievement test. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 295–313.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advancement of University TeachingThe University of Hong KongPokfulumHong Kong
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongPokfulumHong Kong

Personalised recommendations